By

CBS News /

CBS News/ July 13, 2012, 6:34 PM

Romney interview with CBS News: Full transcript

On Friday, July 13, 2012, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney sat down for interviews with all five networks following several days of heightened criticisms over his time at the private equity firm Bain Capital. Romney defended his work there to CBS News chief political correspondent Jan Crawford, and said the president owes him an apology for his campaign's "reckless and absurd" accusations. Below is a transcript of the full interview. Video clips are also available at CBSNews.com.

JAN CRAWFORD: Governor Romney, the Obama campaign is saying that you either committed a felony by lying to the SEC or you are lying to the American people about when you left Bain capital. What do you say to that?

GOV. MITT ROMNEY: Well, I think this kind of statement from the Obama team is really shocking, it's, it's ridiculous, and it's beneath the dignity of the presidency. Look we just had a report come out that millions of Americans remain unemployed. We have 8.2 percent unemployment. That's the 41st straight month we're above eight percent and the president's campaign comes out with these ridiculous charges that obviously every fact checker that looked at it has said it's absurd. And yet they keep on pushing it. I simply - I simply think the president has to recognize that this should be a campaign about the direction of the country, and these personal attacks have to stop.

CRAWFORD: But you say it's ridiculous. But why is there this discrepancy? You said you left Bain in 1999 yet Bain is listing you as CEO up until 2002, so why were you listed as CEO until 2002?

GOV. ROMNEY: The documents show that there's a difference between ownership, which is I owned shares in Bain, but I did not manage Bain. I left as everyone knows to go out and run the Olympics in February of 1999. I was full-time running the Olympics. I had no role whatsoever in the management of Bain after I went off to the Olympics. And that's been demonstrated by people who work at Bain, by all of the documents, but I still retained an ownership interest, I had the capacity if I were not on leave, if I were actually wanting to run the business to do so, but I did not. I left. And that's been demonstrated time and time again.

CRAWFORD: Even if you weren't making these daily managerial decisions, though, doesn't the buck stop with you?

GOV. ROMNEY: Actually when you leave an enterprise, when you have other people who are managing the enterprise, who take responsibility for all the investment decisions, who decide who's going to get hired and fired, who decide compensation decisions, they're the managers, they're the people running the business. I left the business and went off to run the Olympics, did that full time and after three years, when the Olympics were over, we arranged my departure officially from a retirement standpoint.

CRAWFORD: If I could then talk about before you left in 1999, Bain did invest in a series of companies that did expand overseas, sometimes at the expense of American workers -- are you responsible for those decisions?

GOV. ROMNEY: Well I'm not sure which ones you're talking about, but I can tell you the people who have looked at the charges that the Obama campaign comes out with, which is that somehow we outsourced jobs, they've said that those were false and misleading. That the ads are inaccurate. Some have given it multiple Pinocchios. The president keeps on trying to divert any attention he can from his failure to turn around the American economy, and that's what this campaign's about. But the president keeps on trying to find something about Bain which is simply not true. And I left Bain in February of 1999. People can point out how - I was in Salt Lake City for three straight years. I don't recall even coming back once to go to a Bain or management meeting. We were, I was out there running the Olympics and it was a full time job, I can tell you that.

CRAWFORD: So not once. You don't remember a board meeting, you don't remember talking about whether or not there should be outsourcing jobs overseas? Do you remember any involvement with Bain Capital from 1999 on?

GOV. ROMNEY: Jan I had no involvement with the management of Bain Capital after February of 1999. If I had, I would have brought that up at other places where it would have been beneficial to me. But look, I left Bain in February of 1999 as everyone knows I went out and ran the Olympic games. It was a fulltime job. I'm happy that Bain went on, on its own, and did a number of terrific things. Built a very large enterprise, larger than when I left it. But you know the truth is I left in February of 1999 as has been demonstrated time and time again. I was an owner, and being a shareholder doesn't mean that you're running the business. The people who are running it are the ones who run it today and by the way they've been on the air. A number of them are Obama supporters, by the way, actually one fellow who ran for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts, a Democrat, is a Bain Partner. He's been on the air saying the same thing. Mitt left in February of 1999, had no involvement whatsoever with management beyond that point.

CRAWFORD: But as an owner, would you have made money off some of the decisions after you left that were made by other people?

GOV. ROMNEY: Well as an investor, all of the investors participate in the success or failure of various investments, just like you do as a shareholder of an enterprise. But you're not managing that enterprise if you're a shareholder. If you're a shareholder in Ford Motor Company, for instance, you don't make the decision as to where they're going to build a facility or how many people they're going to hire. Those are decisions that are made by management.

CRAWFORD: But you were the sole owner? I mean, how should we be thinking about this? What was your role? You were the sole owner until 2002?

GOV. ROMNEY: I was the owner of a, of the general partnership but there were investors which included pension funds and various entities of all kinds that owned the, if you will, the investments of the firm. But I was the owner of an entity which was a management entity. That entity was one which I had ownership of until the time of the retirement program was put in place. But I had no responsibility whatsoever after February of '99 for the management or ownership - management, rather, of Bain Capital. And by the way, this is really the height of silliness. Don't you really think so? We've got people, 23 million people that are out of work or stopped looking for work, need jobs, and the Obama campaign is out there month after month talking about one attack after the other on me. How about talking about the president's failure to get this economy going? How about talking about a vision for who can get America working again and can see rising wages for the American people? But what he wants to do is try and divert any attention from his lack of success and frankly it's beneath the dignity of his office. He ought to apologize for what he's doing and do what he said when he called me. When I cinched the nomination he called and said you know we're going to have an important and meaningful discussion about the future of the country. Isn't it time to do that? Instead of engage in these ridiculous attacks?

CRAWFORD: But I mean do you think the President owes you an apology because his campaign has suggested you are a criminal or a liar?

GOV. ROMNEY: Absolutely. My goodness. What kind of a president would have a campaign that says something like that about the nominee of another party? This is reckless and absurd on his part and it's something which is beneath his dignity. I hope he recognizes that. Even fellow Democrats have said that. This, look, the president needs to talk about the direction he'd take the country and stop these kinds of ads and attacks that are so, disparate from what the American people want to talk about.

CRAWFORD: But you'd like for him to apologize?

GOV. ROMNEY: Jan, I've told you all I've got to say about that. I think that the president has demeaned the leadership which he should be bringing to this country.

CRAWFORD: Well let me ask you this then, because obviously this is something that we've been hearing a lot about from the, the Obama campaign, the Obama campaign officials and even the President himself suggesting that your time at Bain perhaps, you're going to be painted with the same brush as a lot of people on Wall Street and you know the American people don't hold some of those people in high regard on Wall Street. Are you worried people will think you're hiding something, are you worried about kind of this perceived lack of transparency?

GOV. ROMNEY: Well you know the lack of transparency that I think we saw from the White House in the last couple of weeks has really been quite disturbing, where the president exercised executive privilege to say that documents associated with the Fast and Furious program are not going to be provided to Congress. Talk about a lack of transparency. And then of course there was this promise during the campaign that matters related to health care would be discussed in the open and would be seen on CNN and on cables. That didn't happen. The President has not shown the kind of transparency in leading the country that is necessary. With regards to my own transparency, I've disclosed all the information required by law. Also provided income tax returns which are not required by law and if anyone wants to know what I did in 1999, they can just look at the papers in Salt Lake City and they can see I was running the Olympic games. I think people know that. And so these kinds of attacks are just not only ridiculous, but so far beneath the dignity of the president's responsibility and leadership that I think people have to shake their head and wonder why won't this man focus on getting Americans to work and getting incomes rising in America again?

CRAWFORD: Governor you mentioned the tax returns. You've released one year of your tax returns. A lot of people are saying you should release more, you've got to go back to the early 1980s for a Republican - or a presidential candidate who has only released one year of tax returns. Are you going to be releasing more tax returns?

GOV. ROMNEY: Yes, I'll be releasing this year's tax returns as soon as they're available. And uh - But I know, by the way, you can never satisfy the opposition research team of the Obama organization. They'll always want more. And the answer is they'll have this year's and last year's and that's the information that, by the way, is not required by law. It's the same type of information that was provided by Senator McCain and his campaign. It gives people a full review of my income and my expenses and that kind of matter. I'll tell ya, it's quite a process running for president. You obviously provide all the information you can about yourself and then you have all the opposition team say some pretty outrageous things which I think are very, very disappointing on their part.

CRAWFORD: Let me ask you one final question Governor about the Olympics, which you know well. Obviously have a lot of people have been very upset this week to learn that our uniforms were manufactured in China and now an American company has come forward to say that they will make them here before the Olympics, do you think the Olympics committee should take them up on that?

GOV. ROMNEY: You know, I don't know the particulars or the circumstance, so I really can't comment on that. I presume they have sponsors that are associated with uniforms, and matters of that nature, so I'm not going to weigh into the decisions made in that regard.

CRAWFORD: Do you think the uniforms should have been made from the outset in America? Should that have been a priority or does it trouble you that our uniforms, for our US Olympic team were made in China?

GOV. ROMNEY: I think I really responded to that already, I don't have any further comment that what I've already said.

###

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
20 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kingsfordthecat says:
Only if you don't understand how a company runs do you believe these lies. The obama group is banking on the fact that most don't understand, and it seems the public is ignorant enough to believe him.
Romney signed a piece of paper. Any records of him attending the board meetings? You have ANYTHING else? No? Thought not.
Let's talk about the transparency of obama. Still waiting on your college transcripts. You know, the ones ALL other Presidents have supplied but you? Your FIRST act as President was to SEAL ALL of your records. Nice transparency. How about the transparency of Fast and Furious? Not then either eh? What happened with the real estate deal you made in Chicago with the gangster Tony Rezco? It didn't matter when you appointed Van Jones, an ex-con and avowed Communist as Green Energy Czar, who since had to resign when this was made known. Or what about Tom Daschle, your pick for Health and Human Services Secretary who could not be confirmed because he WAS a tax cheat?
At least you didn't lie when you stood before the Nation and told us that your intentions were to "fundamentally transform this Nation" into something else. You've done just that. We are quickly becoming a Marxist state, as you wanted.
Yes, lets attack your opponent on an item that's been cleared by ALL fact checkers. Who cares unemployment is above 8% for 41 months. You don't seem to.
Let's look at YOUR record and see how opaque you have been.
For the record, it IS a tax.
The saddest part is Romney is just as bad as Obama is.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
seethelight says:
Bain Capital filed documents with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission which stated Romney was "sole stockholder, chairman of the board, chief executive officer, and president" as late as 2002. Considering this, how could Romney possibly claim he had no active roll in Bain after 1999. And another question, considering the average family's net worth in the U.S. is now $80,000 and Romney is worth an estimate $200 million to $250 million why does he need offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands? Why does he have a Swiss Bank Account? Why would the American people possibly want to elect Romney as President of the United States when he sets up accounts to keep his money out of the United States.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rich_Sitko says:
I am having a problem understanding how being the owner but not having management responsibilities absolves you from all responsibility of strategic decisions the company you own pursues. If Mr. Romney had completely divested himself from Bain, I might be more opened to the "I didn't do it defense". If someone is going to own a company, especially someone with political ambitions, he should be responsible for strategic decisions the company makes. Accidents and actions of rogue employees maybe excusable, but having a company you own, outsource jobs overseas makes you the responsible party.
The Republican party for three years has complained about President Obama's "It was that way when I got here" excuses, Romney's problem with outsourcing at Bain is of the same ilk. You can't have it both ways.
reply
aicohnx3 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If I own a bunch of shares (even the majority of shares) in ATT, that doesn't give me managerial responsibility. This isn't a difficult concept to grasp.
Rich_Sitko replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AT&T is quite a stretch from a consulting and investment banking company.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PsyTTech says:
Want to know why people move jobs overseas?

Taxes and regulations.

Technology allows businesses to set up shop anywhere these days. So they go to the places where labor is cheaper, there are fewer regulations and lower taxes. Period. If Bain chose to set up shop offshore, we blame the government and not Bain.

Corporations go to the places where they can make the most money.

For the first time in history, thanks to Technology, America has competition as the primary hub of business in the modern world. We had better learn from that, real fast, because we are quickly being moved to the sidelines while we watch the rest of the world make real progress.
reply
Rich_Sitko replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I do not agree. Companies move jobs overseas for greed. Having lost jobs twice to off-shoring I had an insiders look at what happened. The managers making the decisions, in both cases, had one foot in retirement. The pitched the move to the board as over-hyped cost savings in exchange for a golden parachute. If you don't think that your management won't out-source your job for personal gain, then you are naive.
Playrighter123 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rich_Sitko: Business people go where they can survive. Look at the exodus from California over the last several years. (I know somebody who saved $50,000 per year in taxes by moving his business to Nevada). When profits (and survival) are jeopardized by regulations and taxes, business people make the prudent decision -- and move. (See GE -- whose CEO sits on Obama's econ council -- and their sending jobs to China. See Boeing, opening an assembly line in North Carolina).
linkicon reporticon emailicon
HemiHead66 says:
It's beneath the dignity of the presidency? It doesn't even come close. These wing-nut Republicans probably can't even remember the 3 1/2 years of lies they spewed against Obama. It's like the GOP said on Obama's first day, their mission is to see Obama fail and be a one term President.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
crayme says:
CEO's, managers and directors are obligated to the share-holders to turn a profit. Those who have money invested, those investors wishing to have a stake in the company are courted by the top tier of the company and direction of the company is dictated by this relationship.
Anyone with an IQ over 1, anyone who runs a business, anyone who is anyone knows this to be the case. We need some talented reporters to ask this question, and Obama could certainly capitalize on these bullsh*t statements.

It is no formality or farce that the top shareholder is listed as CEO and the so called managers were probably in email, cell phone, golf course communication with this guy on business matters, no matter how busy this guy was. It doesn't take but a minute to ask your top shareholders "should we move on this deal or not", is this in our best interests, for the shareholders to answer "yes" or "no". Shareholders are extremely important to high level management as they are not likely to move on deals or direction without shareholder approval.

There is too many holes to poke in this story, but likely the ignorants at fox news and the 50% of the country will say "see, he said he was just an investor" and wish to drop the subject. Shareholders are the spine of the CEO's and managers of a company. Not the other way around. They work in tandem.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
paulstewart9 says:
Wow Mitt, you sure failed that interview. Talk about talking in circles. You don't answer the questions. You say you don't remember and then you point to all the people giving their opinions who don't know the facts that you do and that you are not disclosing. This will come back to haunt you...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AttyFAM says:
So gthog, misfit and zebra,

None of you give a damn that whichever way you look at it a felony was committed - either before the SEC or before the Elections Board of Massachusetts?
reply
suyts2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lol, Atty you people are ridiculous. When you don't understand something just ask, people will explain. Accusing people of felonies because you don't understand business is entirely vapid. Do you people even understand what you're doing? You are demonstrating why Romney is uniquely qualified to run this country and at the same time demonstrating how the left's ignorance of business and finance is why our economy can't grow.

Our POTUS and his backers don't know the difference between outsourcing and off-shoring. They don't understand the difference between managing and ownership. They don't understand blind trusts...... which is shocking by itself because this implies the president's money isn't in one. And, if you want to go sniffing for a felony, I'd start there. But, the point is the gobsmacking ignorance of the POTUS and the left is on display for all America and the rest of the world to see. It's riotous. LOL!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gthog says:
You say "heightened criticisms" like it is coming from anybody other than dem political hacks and their stooges in the media.

Nobody else cares. At least Romeny made his money BEFORE he got into politics, as opposed to liberals who profess to not care as much about money but who seem to frequently get very rich AFTER entering politics.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
msfit32 says:
Mitt Romney is a great man..and true leader.

Obama's campaign has been vile and seem willing to go say or do anything to hold onto power. It is awful and I won't vote for Obama again.

I think the whole 'rich, successful businessman is evil' campaign is bizarre..maybe it appeals to Democrats, but to Independents and Republicans that voted for Obama in 2008 it is strange and a big turn-off.
reply
See all 20 Comments