AP/ June 5, 2012, 9:35 PM

Senate GOP blocks Democrats' equal pay bill

(L-R) Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) and Lily Ledbetter hold a news conference at the U.S. Captiol June 5, 2012, in Washington, DC.

(L-R) Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) and Lily Ledbetter hold a news conference at the U.S. Captiol June 5, 2012, in Washington, DC. / Getty Images

(AP) WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked a Democratic bill calling for equal pay in the workplace. But President Barack Obama and his congressional allies aren't finished appealing to women on the No. 1 concern for all voters: the cash in their wallets on the heels of recession.

As expected, the pay equity bill failed along party lines, 52-47, short of the required 60-vote threshold. But for majority Democrats, passage wasn't the only point. The debate itself was aimed at putting Republicans on the defensive on yet another women's issue, this one overtly economic after a government report showing slower-than-expected job growth.

"It is incredibly disappointing that in this make-or-break moment for the middle class, Senate Republicans put partisan politics ahead of American women and their families," Obama said in a statement after the vote.

"Even Mitt Romney has refused to publicly oppose this legislation," added Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. "He should show some leadership."

Unlike past taunts over access to contraception and abortion, Republicans this time didn't take the bait.

In Fort Worth, Texas, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee focused instead on unemployment among Hispanics.

"Of course Gov. Romney supports pay equity for women," said Romney spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg. "In order to have pay equity, women need to have jobs, and they have been getting crushed in this anemic Obama economy."

The device for the choreographed showdown in Washington was a Senate debate over the "Paycheck Fairness Act," a measure that aims to strengthen the Fair Labor Standards Act's protections against pay inequities based on gender.

The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., would require employers to prove that differences in pay are based on qualifications, education and other "bona fides" not related to gender. It also would prohibit employers from retaliating against employees who ask about, discuss or disclose wages in response to a complaint or investigation. And it would make employers who violate sex discrimination laws liable for compensatory or punitive damages. Under the bill, the federal government would be exempt from punitive damages.

Proponents of the bill say it is the next step after the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which Obama signed into law in 2009. The law effectively overturned a Supreme Court decision that had strictly limited workers' ability to file lawsuits over pay inequity. Ledbetter said she didn't become aware of her own pay discrepancy until she neared the end of her 1979-1988 career at a Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Ala.

Near the end of her career, she received an anonymous tip that she was earning less than her male colleagues. She filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A jury initially awarded her more than $3 million in back pay and punitive damages, a sum that a judge later reduced to $300,000.

Ledbetter herself attended the vote and scolded Republicans for their filibuster.

"Do not let these Republicans keep us from getting paycheck fairness," she told reporters, Reid at her side and a letter from her to Romney posted online by the Obama campaign.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell spoke instead on the looming fight over student loan interest rates. Asked if he was concerned about alienating women with the GOP filibuster, the Kentucky Republican said the bill opened the door to more lawsuits against employers.

"We don't think America suffers from a lack of litigation," McConnell said. "We have a jobless problem. We have a debt problem. We have a deficit problem. We got a lot of problems. Not enough lawsuits is not one of them."

Democrats intend to test that discipline in the coming months by raising hubbubs nationally and in House and Senate races over several issues that disproportionately affect women, or just matter greatly to this group of voters that leans heavily toward their party. Independent women voters in exurbs and suburbs of states like Colorado, Virginia and North Carolina are particular targets, said these officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss strategy.

First up in this category is the looming Senate debate over preventing student loan interest rates from rising next month. Look, too, for hubbubs over raising the minimum wage, extending the Bush-era tax cuts, preserving Medicare and Social Security and access to women's health care, including contraception, the officials said.

The paycheck bill was aimed in part at putting Senate Republicans in tough races in the hot seat over a key women's issue. One, Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown, issued a statement emphasizing his support for pay equity but calling the legislation "the right cause but the wrong bill."

"On the heels of last week's dismal jobs report, the last thing we should be doing is putting more job-killing burdens on small businesses and employers," he said.

Tweeted challenger Elizabeth Warren: "Scott Brown voted NO on Paycheck Fairness, telling MA women he thinks it's ok that they continue to earn less than men."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
47 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TimeToEvolve says:
Since you Republicons think you are entitled to your own facts let me point out to you pinheads what article you are trying to spin your propaganda.

Senate GOP blocks Democrats' equal pay bill.
reply
PayNoTaxes__GetNoVote replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hey "Evolved", who's the "Under the bill, the federal government would be exempt from punitive damages." Typical Democrat law. Exempting THEMSELVES from a law they pass for everyone ELSE.

Here is some more reading for closed minded liberal:
"But data from the Obama White House's 2011 annual report show that female staffers there earn a median salary 18 percent lower than that of men.

And nearly four years ago, at the height of the 2008 election season, Scripps Howard syndicated columnist Deroy Murdock wrote that female staffers in Obama's U.S. Senate office, too, were shortchanged."

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/05/democrats-focus-on-equal-pay-issue-while-obama-white-house-pays-women-less/#ixzz25knTUPGN
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TimeToEvolve says:
Hey Joke, is this Joke: Do you have any specific examples of how republicans have not supported women?

Did you read the title of this article? Did you also miss the birth control Republiclown debacle a couple months ago?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TimeToEvolve says:
The Republiclown War on Women continues. But hey they have a War on the Poor, War on the Middle Class, War on American Workers and War on Gays.

Does anyone else get the impression that Republicons LOVE war?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Fox_Rush_Zombie says:
Did someone forget to tell these republican clowns that women get to vote now?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
harv823 says:
Why are the Republicans against women rights ??
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RDriftwood says:
Could the gop possibly do anything more to alienate women voters? How could any woman vote for a gop candidate considering the gop's views?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
baileycccc says:
This proves it, republicans are trying to keep women down. If you needed a reason to vote the gop out of office, this is it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gep1955 says:
This wasn't a defeat for women as much as it is a defeat for the attorneys lobby that funnel campaign money to Mikulski and the dems.
Besides, Obama is providing equal pay to men and women through food stamp and welfare programs.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gep1955 says:
Hellooooo, News Flash. There are more dems in the senate than repubs. It didn't pass because the dems voted against it too.

News Flash...wealthy people got wealthy by not working 40 hour weeks. They got wealthy working 60-80 hour weeks investing savings into things that would earn them more income, not blowing every dime on non-essentials like TVs, rims, jewelry, until AFTER the wealth is earned.
reply
freeamerica31 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I've worked that much and my savings never added up to that...that's right...I don't work on Wall Street. A real worker!
AOCGUY replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gep, no dems voted against the bill. It failed because it required 60 votes and there are NOT 60 dems in the Senate. Try reading the article next time before posting stupid comments.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
omnibus66 says:
The pugs win another battle in their war on women. Any female who votes for any republican is a traitor to herself.
reply
rearley1980 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree with you on this. We'll watch the number of women who will defect to the democrats with the non-passage of this bill and others like it. It just keeps getting better for the democrats. It is unbelievable the unprecedented number of bills and laws that are being brought forward with this Congress. Hundreds of them involving restrictions on women's rights, family law issues, conservative and religious laws, laws about marriage, Planned Parenthood, abortion, etc., the conservative agenda is trying to take over this country legislatively and if they think it will be easy, they will soon find out it isn't. The tea-party can't sit back and say that big goverment must go because that is exactly what all these bills represent. Can't have it both ways, folks. Even more disturbing to me is that it seems like we're back to the South against the North. That one will neer die.
See all 47 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right