AP/ May 7, 2012, 4:38 PM

Witness: Edwards asked heiress for more money

Former presidential candidate and Sen. John Edwards, right, arrives at a federal courthouse with his daughter, Cate Edwards, in Greensboro, N.C., Monday, May 7, 2012.

Former presidential candidate and Sen. John Edwards, right, arrives at a federal courthouse with his daughter, Cate Edwards, in Greensboro, N.C., Monday, May 7, 2012. / AP Photo/Chuck Burton

(AP) GREENSBORO, N.C. -- Shortly before his 2011 indictment on corruption charges, John Edwards called the elderly heiress whose money helped hide his pregnant mistress and asked for $3 million more, a witness testified Monday at the trial of the former presidential hopeful.

Librarian Tony L. Willis testified at Edwards' corruption trial that his boss, 101-year-old Rachel "Bunny" Mellon, sought his help in drafting a letter to the politician. Willis said Mellon reported receiving a call from Edwards that day in 2001 seeking $3 million to help him launch the next phase of his life. Mellon said she wanted to write to explain her reasons for declining his request.

Willis said the letter was never sent to Edwards at the direction of one of Mellon's lawyers, who reviewed the document before it was to be mailed. It was then well known that Edwards was under investigation by a grand jury in North Carolina.

However, the jury considering Edwards' fate heard nothing about the financial request, made about three weeks before his June 2011 indictment on six counts related to alleged campaign finance violations. As a prosecutor questioned Willis -- librarian of a vast private botanical library located on Mellon's 2,100-acre Virginia estate -- one of Edwards' defense lawyers objected. The judge then sent the jury from the room until she could hear what the witness had to say.

Edwards' lawyer Alan Duncan argued that the 2011 request was irrelevant to the indictment, which focuses on what prosecutors called about $1 million in secret payments from Mellon and another supporter of his 2008 White House bid. They say some of that money was used to help hide Rielle Hunter, Edwards' then-pregnant mistress, from tabloid reporters seeking to expose the Democrat's affair.

Edwards has pleaded not guilty. He faces up to 30 years in prison if convicted.

Duncan argued that Willis' testimony and the copy of Mellon's letter that he retained could prejudice jurors against Edwards.

A cornerstone of the candidate's defense is that his close aide and campaign fundraiser, Andrew Young, had been the one who asked Mellon for $725,000 in 2007 to take care of a "personal need" of the former senator, without disclosing precisely how the money would be used. Edwards denies knowing about the so-called "Bunny" money, much of which Young kept and spent on building a dream home, attorneys have said.

After several minutes of deliberation, U.S. District Court Judge Catherine C. Eagles upheld Duncan's objection, barring prosecutors from asking about the letter in front of the jury or entering the document into evidence.

Earlier, Mellon lawyer and money manager Alex D. Forger testified that the heiress believed the $725,000 she sent to Young was intended as a gift to Edwards, not as a campaign contribution. Mellon had already given the maximum allowed $2,300 contribution to Edwards' presidential primary campaign and would give another $6.4 million to a political action committee and other organizations associated with his White House bid.

Forger said Mellon, who first met Edwards' in 2005, wanted to help the politician whom she considered a friend. He said the $6.4 million donated directly to Edwards' groups was "quite small" compared to the heiress' overall net worth.

"I think her primary interest was in John as a person," Forger said. "She in her later years has had few close friends. Her husband had died, her daughter was ill. She took a liking to Senator Edwards. Whatever was of interest to him, she would support."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
marychgo says:
What's at issue in the trial is whether the Mellon/Baron money constituted "campaign funds." By definition, money Edwards requested from Mellon in 2011 (the article's reference to 2001 is a typo) did NOT represent 2008 "campaign funds." That's why this testimony is not admissible evidence.

We can ALL agree: Edwards is a slimeball. Elizabeth Edwards was a remarkable lady, and she deserved far better than she got. But being a miserable excuse for a husband is NOT a federal crime.

The Bush-appointed North Carolina US attorney concocted this case as a way to propel himself into higher office (the election is today!) There's PLENTY of evidence Edwards was a jerk, but NO evidence he committed a crime. In fact, according to comments on other threads, Mellon even paid gift tax for the money she "gifted," theoretically to Edwards, though most of it went to the Youngs. (It's not clear whether Baron paid gift tax on his contributions.)

Much as we might LIKE to see John Edwards in a jail uniform, it seems pretty clear that he's an idiot, not a criminal....
reply
RUSerIus1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bunny Mellon was born in 1910..... So why are news teams surprised she didn't get on the stand in her defense......Give me a break folks R U SERIOUS! Not defending Edwards....just sayin....Media need to do better homework!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
maz_beachbum says:
Wonder who I could call for $3 million to help me launch the next phase of my life??
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sas912 says:
Smitty, from other news stories, what made this call different is that Edwards himself called to discuss it with Bunny Mellon and to ask her directly for this $3 mil. But the call was made well after he was no longer a viable candidate for any public office (there is a typo in the story). The reason I think it is relevant and should be admitted into evidence is precisely because Edwards was NOT a viable candidate for public office and on this occasion, Bunny Mellon turned down his request which does cut against the argument by the defense and Bunny Mellon's attorney's testimony from Friday that the money she gave was a personal "gift" to Edwards and had nothing to do with the fact that he was running for the Presidency. If that is true, and if she was so enamored of Edwards personally that she would "gift" him with large sums of money irrespective of his candidacy, then why not give him the $3 mil after he was no longer a candidate to help him move onto the "next phase" of his life? To me it's clear that she was happy to give money while he was a candidate because she liked the idea of being a "kingmaker" and helping someone she saw as akin to a Kennedy achieve the highest office in the land. That is power, and it makes people beholden to you, which is why the campaign laws limit donations.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
venusvegasvada says:
What a scumbag. Has this guy even worked a day in his life?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
waynenipper says:
Edwards is one stupendous a$$hole ...
reply
cattiej replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Isn't that the truth..this foul person needs to be locked up in prison the rest of his life....without the possibility of parole. Young should get 50 years in prison...This mess that Edwards created, much of it while his wife was dying turns my stomach. I don't know how his daughters can have anything to do with him...I can't believe that this guy could have been elected our President..I can't believe that Mitt Romney may be our President. I may be old but I am not to old to sell my home and move to Canada...we have vacationed there for years and wanted to move there 30 years ago...looks like it may be the next step in our lives...wonder when Romney is going to release his finincial records and the places where he has off shore bank accounts.?
waynenipper replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hey 'cattiej'... you'd be welcome up here in Canada. We do have a few wing nut politicians here as well, but it would appear no where near the number you all have.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
smittyc says:
While the phone call evidence is heresay, I would like to know whether Edwards made the call himself or his flunkie Young made the call. Based on earlier news, Young kept and spent most of the first million for himself. I also object to Young getting immunity, the government did not need his testimony to convict Edwards, and currently I view Young as more culpable than Edwards.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
greco99-2009 says:
What about 'W Spann' and other similar illegal campaign contributions to the Romney campaign?

Or, Does Mitt Romney get a free pass while he is running?
reply
lewmal replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
good question, they are so full of bull crap
stormerF69 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You can not that dumb or is it the Obama koolaid that has befuddled your brain? Campaign contributions are made by contributers,got that? Misappropriation of campaign funds is illegal,I know you have problems with the illegal word so use corrupt,most Democrats know what that is.
See all 12 Comments