AP/ April 30, 2012, 2:41 PM

Ex-aide's wife breaks down on witness stand

Andrew Young, former aide to former Sen. John Edwards, and his wife, Cheri, on March 12, 2010.

Andrew Young, former aide to former Sen. John Edwards, and his wife, Cheri, on March 12, 2010. / File,AP Photo/Sara D. Davis

Updated: 2:39 p.m. ET

(AP) GREENSBORO, N.C. -- The wife of an ex-aide to John Edwards broke down on the witness stand Monday as she recounted how the candidate asked the couple to hide an affair he was having and justified using wealthy donors' money to do it.

Testifying at Edwards' campaign corruption trial, Cheri Young said she huddled around a phone in her Chapel Hill home with her husband, Andrew Young, and Edwards' pregnant mistress, Rielle Hunter.

On the call, Edwards emphasized the need to preserve his campaign and keep the affair from his wife, Elizabeth, Cheri Young said. It was a couple weeks before the 2008 Iowa caucuses, and two suspicious tabloid reporters had already tracked Hunter from a doctor's appointment to the Youngs' home.

Edwards made the plan sound "as if it was for the good of the country," Cheri Young said.

Asked by a prosecutor why she went along with it, Young put her hands together, pressed them to her chin and bowed her head as if in prayer. As she began to weep, U.S. District Court Judge Catherine C. Eagles dismissed the jury to give her time to compose herself.

About 25 feet away, Edwards sat back in his chair and put two fingers to his pursed lips. As Young dabbed her tears with a tissue, the former U.S. Senator glanced at his watch.

Once the jury returned, Young answered the question.

"I felt like everything had been dumped in my lap," she said. "Everybody was on board but me. ... I didn't want the campaign to explode and for it to be my fault. I decided to live with a lie."

During the call, Edwards suggested that it would only be a one-day story if Andrew Young took responsibility for the baby.

"'Nobody cares about two staffers having an affair,"' Young recalled Edwards saying.

Hunter had earlier been paid as a videographer by one of the organizations linked with Edwards, who is accused of deliberately using money from two wealthy donors to hide Hunter as he sought the White House in 2008.

Edwards has pleaded not guilty to six counts related to campaign-finance violations. He faces up to 30 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines if convicted on all counts.

At issue are payments from a wealthy Texas lawyer, Fred Baron, who served as Edwards' campaign- finance chairman and an elderly heiress, Rachel "Bunny" Mellon. Andrew Young, who testified last week under an immunity agreement, has acknowledged that he used for himself about $1 million of $1.2 million in payments from the two donors.

Earlier in her testimony, Cheri Young said she had doubts about taking the "Bunny money" and using it to cover up the affair. She said Edwards hatched the plan to have her deposit the money into an account controlled by her and her husband. Concerned about violating the federal $2,300 limit on individual campaign contributions, Young said she reluctantly agreed after insisting on hearing Edwards himself say the scheme was legal.

"I heard Mr. John Edwards tell me on the phone that he checked with the campaign lawyers and that this was legal," she said.

Cheri Young took the witness stand late Friday after a full week of testimony by her husband, a former fundraiser and close aide to Edwards.

Though Andrew Young testified last week that the couple ended up keeping about $1 million of the money provided by two wealthy donors, the couple also paid to support the pregnant mistress out of their account, paying for her medical care, a BMW, a $2,700-a-month rental house and a monthly allowance of thousands of dollars in cash.

Cheri Young said she agreed to handle the money because if the public found out about Edwards' affair with Hunter, the campaign and her husband's job were in danger.

"I cannot tell you how disgusted I was. Why me? This was my husband's fight," she said. "Now I had to fix it."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
23 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
karek40 says:
When a shark is wounded those around him turn on him. If you ever associate with Mrs. Young beware she will turn on anyone if it is in her best interest. I don't know much about the campaign laws and their donations, but his wife had cancer. He had the affair, I think keeping it from her or trying to was an act of kindness. Why burder her further.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
marychgo says:
The issue is NOT whether John Edwards is a slimeball; we all agree he is. The question in this trial is whether he committed a CRIME, and I haven't heard of ANY evidence that the money sloshing around between Baron and Mellon and the Youngs and Hunter were "campaign funds." If it wasn't "campaign funds," there IS no crime!

On the numbers: it sounds as though Bunny Mellon kicked in about $925,000 and Baron added roughly $250; hence, $1,175,000 total. It appears that payments to and expenses for Rielle Hunter ran to something between $200,000 and $250,000. That suggests that the Youngs "kept" just under $1 million.

Elizabeth Edwards was an admirable and classy lady, and she deserved much better than she got from her "pretty boy" husband. But it's not against the law to be a jerk....
reply
marychgo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Baron added roughly $250,000 (sorry!)
linkicon reporticon emailicon
marychgo says:
However vile a human being John Edwards may be, the issue in this case is whether he committed a crime...and I'm still waiting for ANY evidence that the money Baron and Mellon paid were campaign funds. If it doesn't constitute campaign funds, there IS no crime.

A note on numbers: it appears that Bunny Mellon kicked in roughly $925,000 and John Baron paid roughly $250,000; hence, $1,175,000 total. It sounds like payments to and expenses for Rielle Hunter came to something between $200,000 and $250,000. So what the Youngs "kept" is something close to $1 million.

Was John Edward trying to preserve his political viability as well as to keep his infidelity from his long-suffering wife? Sure. Does that fact turn this money into "campaign funds"? I don't think so!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
treehgr07 says:
Of the $1.2M the Youngs used $1M on themselves. What is going on? The tears don't work on me. The Youngs lost all credibility by taking the money for themselves.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cathy2436 says:
Birds of a feather.....the true victim is a young child who loves her father and perhaps will grow up thinking what alot of little girls think, ' that daddies can do no wrong ', or perhaps a wife, who, at the time of these alleged crimes, I say alleged because in our justice system we are innocent until proven guilty, but a wife with a terminal illness, who, by all accounts, seemingly believed in her marriage vows and until it was publicly thrown into her face and everything went awry, was one of the most injured of all. If one thing is to be proved by the lies, untruths, pain and heartache of all of this, I hope that in today's society we as a people feel that we DO HAVE THE RIGHT to demand that our leaders and potential leaders possess a certain level of morality defined by HONESTY. Quite simply if honesty had prevailed in all things spoken and lived, this trial would not be taking place...would it? ...just a thought...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
smittyc says:
Young kept 1 million of the money for himself. Now he is testifying against Edwards as a government witness and has been granted immunity. I have zero belief in anything Young, his wife or Edwards has to say. The child belongs to Edwards, that is proven. The money came from other people, Mellon etc. That is proven. Why is the government bribing Young and letting him keep the money for his testimony. Honest decent moral people quit when corruption raises its head. Young took the money, pocketed it and is now testifying for the government. No way a juror is going to convict Edwards with Young pocketing a million dollars for his testimony. While I personally hold a contemptuous view of Edwards running around on his wife while she had cancer and was dying, I couldn't believe someone like Young. He has less credibility then Edwards.
reply
CitySoap replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agreed
treehgr07 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Good question - what does Young's immunity cover? Do the Youngs get to keep the money?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MIO42 says:
BMW?
I guess ya gotta look good as your life gets flushed down the drain
Oh ya that works
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CitySoap says:
Let's see how Cheri's aw shucks, I held my nose and took the million dollars for my husband and the good the nation story holds up under cross examination.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mjlewis6 says:
Are we so myopic that we IGNORE war criminals as something that is less heinous than a politician trying to hide a relationship with campaign money.

Money is so important for war profiteering...but we dare not look at what we may find.

But the moral failings of a candidate who lost an election, unlike the ones who REQUIRED a supreme court order to insure their election...is somehow more important?

Get a grip. As long as you are willing to look at moral failings in a relationship, you will never see the horizon of shame our own leaders have brought to our pre-emptive war on Iraq, the billions spent for NOTHING as to Al Qaeda there, and the deaths of both our troops and the civilian population there over fictitious WMDs. Where is the War Crimes Court? Please remember the men who did the war REFUSED to consider signator status for the US to the very world organization responsible for addressing those crimes. Then we perpetrated a few of our own. Thanks for IGNORING the biggest story of the new century: American War Criminals.
reply
cathy2436 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The story is John Edwards, what he did or did not do. Not about the decisions made by the current president, nor decisions made by former presidents from any political party during their time in office. Focus, focus, focus on this story. Instead of trying to change the past with arguments that can no longer be won, blame that can no longer be cast, try to be objective in a less angry manner, and learn from mistakes made throughout history by all of our leaders. All dots connected in present day reportings do not necessarily lead back to any of the wars in which this country has found itself. You are entitled to your opinion which has valid points that NEED to be discussed, but perhaps it should be voiced at the end of an article that ISN'T about infidelity in marriage, alleged illegal campaign financing, etc.
Libby49va replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yeah, I'm still waiting for Bush jr, Cheny and Rumsfield to be tried for war crimes.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cbsnews_viewer says:
I wonder how much watch and clock-watching time will be available to Edwards with incarceration? I want to know what colors he will wear Jail House Orange, Stripes or maybe Federal prison blue. He thinks he is real slick. He might be the slick lawyer version of John Goti. Who knows. Its all in the juror's hands.
reply
See all 23 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right