CBS/AP/ April 10, 2012, 4:17 PM

Obama pushes for Buffett tax rule in Florida

(CBS/AP) BOCA RATON, Fla. - President Barack Obama said on Tuesday that the choice facing voters this November will be as stark as in the milestone 1964 contest between Lyndon Johnson and Barry Goldwater - one that ended up with one of the greatest Democratic landslides in U.S. history.

The president made his comments during a blitz through Florida, and right before his general election foe was essentially decided. Republican Rick Santorum dropped out of the presidential contest, making it clear that Obama would face off against Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor.

Obama is using his Florida swing to call again for Congress to raise taxes on millionaires, a populist pitch on an issue that he hopes will help define the differences with nominee-to-be Romney.

Buffett Rule: Policy prescription, or political opportunity?
White House Buffett Rule: A look at the numbers
White House pushes Buffett rule on taxes

The president outlined his support for the so-called Buffett rule at a university speech in Boca Raton, Fla., arguing that wealthy investors should not pay taxes at a lower rate than middle-class wage earners.

The push for the Buffett rule, named after billionaire investor Warren Buffett, comes ahead of a Senate vote next week and as millions of Americans prepare to file their income tax returns. The plan has little chance of passing Congress, but Senate Democrats say the issue underscores the need for economic fairness.

Speaking at Florida Atlantic University, Obama criticized the Republicans current budget plan.

"You can't pay down a deficit by taking in 4.6 trillion less money especially when denying you will make all of these cuts," said Obama. "More than a trillion of tax cuts they propose will go to people making 250,000 a year which is an average of 150,000 dollars for every millionaire and billionaire."

Earlier in the day, Obama told donors at the first of three campaign events in this battleground state "this election will probably have the biggest contrast that we've seen maybe since the Johnson-Goldwater election, maybe before that." The events were expected to raise at least $1.7 million.

In his 1964 race against Barry Goldwater, Johnson carried 44 of 50 states and won 61 percent of the popular vote, the largest share of any candidate since 1820.

Running on a record that included the Great Society, Johnson portrayed Goldwater as a dangerous extremist. He was aided by Goldwater's GOP convention speech, in which the candidate proclaimed, "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice."

In a reception at a gated community in Palm Beach Gardens, Obama said Democrats would ensure the rich pay their fair share, while focusing on investments in education, science and research and caring for the most vulnerable.

By contrast, he said, Republicans would dismantle education and clean energy programs so they can give still more tax breaks to the rich.

Obama did not mention Romney by name, but the economic fairness message was the theme of his day - and aimed squarely at the wealthy former Massachusetts governor.

Obama was capping his day at a large rally-style event in Hollywood, Fla., that was to include a musical performance by singer John Legend.


© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
48 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Zann-Zel says:
Lets rename this the Reagan Rule - after all, he campaigned on the very same thing!

Lets ask the 2/3 of the millionaires who support this rule...
Lets talk to 1/2 the republicans who support this rule...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
infantryman1968 says:
Obama pushes for Buffett tax rule in Florida


LOL!


Hey Obama,

The top 1% are pay for 40% of "The Stash"

The top 10% are pay for 70% of "The Stash"

The Irony.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
infantryman1968 says:
Obama pushes for Buffett tax rule in Florida


LOL!

The Buffett tax rule? Really?

Buffett made most of his money as a slum lord for section housing via Government Handouts and is currently behind over a million dollars in back taxes........

So we should all do that right?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
johngalt_as says:
You know what would be great? If Mr. Harvard Law review could use an ounce of his supposed vast intelligence and tell us just what it means when he says he wants to "invest in the economy"? And how yet more taxes on the rich translate into "invest"? And why doesn't the media ever pin him down on the meanings, it is always so vague with these people. Hope and Change, nobody bothered to ask what that actually meant. Obamacare, we had to pass it to know what's in it. Are they ever straight with us about anything? He is full of $hit with everything he says. He talks about things he know will not pass as political props. He has not delivered on ANYTHING he talked about - except Hope and Change, he really has changed things; anyone better off than 4 years ago?
reply
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ask the rich why they aren't investing in America. Why are all their richs being invested offshore?
thechooch1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
johngalt_ass lots of name calling, few facts. Your President has said for a long time to invest in the infrastructure. Where have you been? Talk about things that won't pass, have you seen the House's Budget? And yes, have you already also forgotten the GREAT RECESSION, TARP, etc.? We are better off than the end of the last failed administration, much better.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
infantryman1968 says:
Obama pushes for Buffett tax rule in Florida


LOL!

The Buffett tax rule? Really?

Buffett made most of his money as a slum lord for section housing and is behind over a million dollars in back taxes.

The Irony.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thelovegod says:
It's all politics right? Each guy is just taking the traditional party position. So I don't buy in completely to either one.

But who in their right mind would stick up for the rich as a strategy, when the crisis is in the middle class?

Seems to me that Obama would win just by countering Romney.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rick03466 says:
Can Obama say hello without trying to get his hands into someones pocket? I am not terribly fond of the Romney or any republican but if the Democrats can't give us a sane Candidate I and apparently the Majority of Independent Voters will be voting for Romney. DEMOCRATS GIVE US A BETTER CHOICE!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
johngalt_as says:
I can't believe how stupid and gullible some people are. The president is in trouble and so he pulls out his old reliable class warfare card. Take from the rich to give to the gov't, and the masses yell, "yeah, stick it to the rich man." And yet his policies kill job growth which he can later blame the wealthy for the jobs leaving the country because costs for doing business are too high here. Then he'll pull the card again and the masses will again yell, "yeah, stick to the rich man." and the cycle repeats.

The president will talk about investing in eductaion. Meanwhile more than ever is being spent on education and our kids are dumber than ever. And let's say we invest in more education and college for everyone mortgaged on the backs of parnets losing their retirment and students mortgaging the futures for a college education, for what. Supposedly smarter grads to fight over fewer jobs. Warehousing people in substandard schools only delays the inevitable day when they will graduate and bartned or wait tables. Okay so how does a more educated population use what they learned if there are no jobs. Well, at least the liberal profs will have their hand at corrupting student values to believe the gov't will provide everything they need. It's all BS and this president has totally failed to deliver what he said he would. Now he is in full damage control hoping the voters can be conned again. Judging from many of the comments on here he might succeed and that would be sad.

If things don't go well he always has war to fall back on. In Iran and or Syria, he'll play the patriot card. Or, he and the media will stoke the fires of racial division. Notice the N-word is being used more on the news. Whether it is a war oversea or a war here. He'll get his deflection one way or the other. But most people don't see any of it. Obama is dangerous and getting creepier by the day and yet a lot of people will blindly yell, "yeah!" In 1945 Germans woke up and asked themselves, "we supported what? What were we thinking!" He ain't a naz i but he loves the power no less. Someone's pulling his strings.
reply
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bmallen

What a hypocrit you are, first it's don't tax the rich because they create jobs So where are all these good paying jobs the rich are supposed to be creating, after all they got taxbreaks. The only jobs the rich are creating are offshore in slave wage countries. Guess you haven;t figured out the rich don't care about the U.S., they're only worried about filling their pockets. Now how can good jobs be generated, with the rights insistance on taxbreaks for offshoring jobs.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fiberglass3 says:
The only unifying position Republicans can coalesce around is giving more wealth to the rich, and after thirty years of fallacious trickle-down economic theory, most Americans know it has not, does not, and will not work.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fitstshu says:
Republicans are strange animals. I know many. When they here the word tax they go crazy, but if there is a government hand out that they here about, they will be the first in line to collect it.Just heard from one of them the other day about a bogus v.a. pension he is getting and said I should put in for it . Sorry, I don't do that crap and I'm a Democrat. One more example section 8 housing whom is paying the landlord? YOU ARE
reply
johngalt_as replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They go crazy over the word tax because they are taxed to death. It's no problem if the tax burden isn't weighing down on your back, or if you are a lib who still oddly believes the Gov't is using your tax dollars wisely. But for people who think with their heads yes, we go crazy when they keep wanting more, and more. There is no logic to it. Even a parasite knows better than to kill it's host, because they are living well off of it. This bunch (and I assume you also) won't be happy until the host is dead and drained. Who they going to suck from then? Maybe you.
luadda22 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And google, just what law is it that is not applied equally?
See all 48 Comments