AP/ November 9, 2011, 7:01 AM

"Personhood" fight still alive after Miss. defeat

Amendment 26 supporter Joyce Haskins, with her grandchild Landry Bruce, waves to passersby outside the voting booths at the Oxford Conference Center in Oxford, Miss. on Nov. 8, 2011.

Amendment 26 supporter Joyce Haskins, with her grandchild Landry Bruce, waves to passersby outside the voting booths at the Oxford Conference Center in Oxford, Miss. on Nov. 8, 2011. / AP Photo/Oxford Eagle, Bruce Newman

JACKSON, Miss. - Abortion opponents say they're still pursuing life-at-fertilization ballot initiatives in six other states even though voters in the Bible Belt state of Mississippi rejected the conservative measure.

Abortion rights supporters praised the vote, saying the measure went too far because it would have made common forms of birth control illegal and would have forced women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term.

The White House called it a victory for women and families.

"The president believes that extreme amendments like this would do real damage to a woman's constitutional right to make her own health care decisions, including some very personal decisions on contraception and family planning," President Barack Obama's spokesman Jay Carney said in a statement.

Ohio vote shows unions still a political force
Voters across nation stick largely by incumbents

If it had passed, the "personhood" proposal was intended to prompt a legal challenge to Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a legal right to abortion. A Colorado-based group, Personhood USA, is trying to get the measure on 2012 ballots in Florida, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, Nevada and California.

Voters in Colorado have already rejected similar proposals in 2008 and 2010. Keith Mason, a co-founder of the group, said they might try again in Mississippi, too.

"It's not because the people are not pro-life," Mason said of the failed ballot measure. "It's because Planned Parenthood put a lot of misconceptions and lies in front of folks and created a lot of confusion."

Planned Parenthood Federation of America said in a statement that Mississippi voters rejected the amendment because they understood it was government going too far.

The measure "would have allowed government to have control over personal decisions that should be left up to a woman, her family, her doctor and her faith, including keeping a woman with a life-threatening pregnancy from getting the care she needs, and criminalizing everything from abortion to common forms of birth control such as the pill and the IUD (the intrauterine device)."

The so-called personhood initiative was rejected by more than 55 percent of Mississippi voters, falling far short of the threshold needed for it to be enacted.

The measure divided the medical and religious communities and caused some of the most ardent abortion opponents, including Republican Gov. Haley Barbour, to waver with their support.

Opponents said the measure would have made birth control, such as the morning-after pill or the intrauterine device, illegal. More specifically, the ballot measure called for abortion to be prohibited "from the moment of fertilization" — wording that opponents suggested would have deterred physicians from performing in vitro fertilization because they would fear criminal charges if an embryo doesn't survive.

Opponents also said supporters were trying to impose their religious beliefs on others by forcing women to carry unwanted pregnancies, including those caused by rape or incest.

Amy Brunson voted against the measure, in part because she has been raped. She also has friends and family that had children through in vitro fertilization and she was worried this would end that process.

"The lines are so unclear on what may or may not happen. I think there are circumstances beyond everybody's control that can't be regulated through an amendment," said Brunson, a 36-year-old dog trainer and theater production assistant from Jackson.

Buddy Hairston, 39, took his 8-year-old triplets to a precinct outside Jackson to hold signs supporting the initiative.

"Unborn children are being killed on a daily basis in our state and country, and it's urgent that we protect them," said Hairston, a forestry consultant.

Mississippi already has tough abortion regulations and only one clinic where the procedures are performed, making it a fitting venue for a national movement to get abortion bans into state constitutions.

The state's largest Christian denomination, the Mississippi Baptist Convention, backed the proposal through its lobbying arm, the Christian Action Commission.

"We mourn with heaven tonight over the loss of Initiative 26, which would have provided the hope of life for thousands of God's unborn babies in Mississippi," said the commission's director, the Rev. Jimmy Porter. "Instead the unborn in Mississippi will continue to be led down on a path of destruction to horrible deaths both inside their mothers and in laboratories."

The bishops of the Episcopal Diocese of Mississippi and the General Conference of the United Methodist Church opposed the initiative.

Bishop Joseph Latino of the Catholic Diocese of Jackson, a church traditionally against abortion, issued a statement neither supporting nor opposing the initiative. The Mississippi State Medical Association took a similar step, while other medical groups opposed it.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
70 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MGerra says:
On a personal level, I do not believe in abortion. However, it is not my place to force my beliefs onto another person. Those who would try to use their religion to try to force this issue....God gave us this nifty little thing called Free Will. We have a God given right to make choices, be they good or bad choices, they are our personal choices to make. Will there be an accounting of those choices, yes, I believe there will be.
On the other hand, those who are trying to force their beliefs onto others via religion will also have to answer for that choice. When as Christians we begin to judge others and condemn them based on our beliefs we turn them further from God and to me that is the bigger sin.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
conservalandfairy says:
Every child conceived whether by rape or incest is a truly a blessing from God.
reply
clydealan2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What to do about the tens of thousands of those blessings starving to death around the world? Yours is a lofty goal but has not much to do with reality.
holalanemeir replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
God has nothing to do with rape-it is a curse. Why reward the rapist?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
superdem1 says:
Every acorn is not an oak tree. Every handful of cells is not a PERSON, this is absurd. This planet is groaning under the weight of human overpopulation, and this is what these people are concerned about ? Personhood for zygotes ? REALLY ? Get over your hysteria and think about this poor planet. We already cannot find jobs for everyone, we cannot provide health care for everyone, we cannot look after the old and the sick, the orphanages are crowded. Our water is polluted, our air is polluted, the polar ice caps are melting, and you want to protect every single zygote ? This is the insanity of the uneducated human mind.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RedDeath50 says:
The republiClown motto:

Love the fetus.
Hate the child.
reply
Socialization replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Democrat politicians in Alabama supported this as well.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
If the GOP doesn't get off this attempt to deny women their human rights.......the party is likely to fall into oblivion. This attitude simply will NOT succeed in the US.
reply
Socialization replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Democrat politicians in Alabama supported this as well.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bigsk8fan says:
republicans complain about 'big' govt. yet republicans will do everything to get into and control a woman's womb. what's up with that?
reply
retiredgustav replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hypocrisy at it's best.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Turbidite says:
The amendment would open the door for charges of involuntary manslaughter or negligent homicide against pregnant women that suffer a miscarriage due to an accident, such as tripping and falling or accidentally or being hit by a vehicle if they are deemed clumsy or inattentive. There are so many variations on the theme that even Solomon would be baffled as to a judgement. A person is an ex-uteri being capable of existing without organic connectivity to another human.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
quatermass2 says:
Florida, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, Nevada and California

If this didn't pass in Mississippi, it doesn't have any chance in those states. Don't these people have more immediate concerns? Why are the same people who complain about an intrusive government the same ones who want their (usually peculiar) religous beliefs enforced by (wait for it) THE GOVERNMENT?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
johndevinejr says:
"Unborn children are being killed on a daily basis in our state and country, and it's urgent that we protect them," said Hairston, a forestry consultant.

There is no such a thing as an "unborn child". The fetus becomes a child at birth.
reply
retiredgustav replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
skyk1... It would be welfare for lawyers.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
Hey, how about all those chicken eggs they are eating in MS. God doesn't want them to abort those poor creatures.

Hey next it will be illegal to masturbate because you are killing potential lives. And we can't have any women have their periods because they are wasting eggs. I say lock em all up.
reply
See all 70 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right