By

Nate Cohn /

The New Republic/ July 31, 2012, 4:37 PM

Obama leads every poll in Ohio -- but that doesn't mean he'll win

President Obama waves as he boards Air Force One before his departure from Andrews Air Force Base, Md., July 30, 2012.

President Obama waves as he boards Air Force One before his departure from Andrews Air Force Base, Md., July 30, 2012. / AP Photo

(The New Republic) If you take a quick look at the electoral map, Ohio really stands out. Here's a white working class state that Bush carried twice but where Obama still seems to be doing quite well. Not only is Obama competitive, he leads in every poll conducted over the last two months -- occasionally by a substantial margin. On balance, Obama's up by 5 points in the RealClearPolitics average, despite a slimmer national lead and Ohio's Republican-lean. But while Chicago has every right to be pleased with their position in Ohio, Romney's chances are much better than Obama's lead in the polls suggests.

According to the most recent RCP average, Obama is averaging 47.4 percent of the vote in Ohio. There's nothing wrong with holding 47.4 percent of the vote, but it doesn't show any special strength. It's not much better than the other swing states -- Obama even has 46.7 percent in North Carolina -- and it's not as much as Kerry won eight years ago. So Obama appears to hold the dependably Democratic vote and not much more. Again, there's nothing wrong with only holding the dependably Democratic vote in July, but Ohio is a state where the dependably Democratic vote alone doesn't get the job done.

Obama's large lead can be ascribed to a simple reason: Romney hasn't consolidated the conservative base. Polls show Romney down to just 42 percent of the vote in Ohio, an outright unimpressive showing, far lower than his average in the other true battleground states. This suggests that plenty of Republican-leaning Ohio voters remain reluctant to embrace their nominee. It is a little surprising that Romney can't reunite the McCain vote, given the degree of opposition to President Obama and his ability to unify the GOP elsewhere.

But sooner or later, these Republican-leaners are going to come back to Romney. So there's good reason to believe that Romney can make the jump to 46 or 47 percent without much difficulty, and that would effectively inaugurate a dead-heat in the Buckeye State. The question is whether Romney's early problems indicate broader issues that might prevent Romney from true swing voters. For instance, it's possible that the Bain and outsourcing attacks are especially resonant in a state hit hard by globalization. If the attacks are disrupting Romney's ability to unify McCain voters, then there's good cause to believe that the ads are resonating with undecided voters.

The upshot: Neither candidate has an easy road to victory in Ohio. Romney needs to reclaim Republican-leaning voters and then persuade undecided white working class voters who might not approve of Obama's performance, but are probably quite skeptical of any candidate persistently linked to outsourcing and closing factories. And Obama's route isn't any easier; he's trying to win voters who don't approve of his performance in a Republican-leaning state. While Romney's path might be somewhat longer, Obama fans shouldn't celebrate until their candidate completes the hardest leg of the race.

Nate Cohn is a staff writer at The New Republic. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

The New Republic. All rights reserved.
54 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
walkthetalk says:
YES! These polls are always accurate, I remember that not so long ago the polls predicted Governor Scott Walker would lose by wide margin. Go figure.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rockerrick says:
Obama will win in Ohio. Romney is one of the big shots that killed the economy in the first place! He will not disclose his tax returns. How could anyone trust a man like that?!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
asopw says:
It is so hard to tell what will happen and what will sway people but those who don't have to ever accept such responsibility can sit back and denounce anyone. That is what always astounds me.
I am concerned (and am amazed that others aren't )that someone has made a threat on President Obama's life and this person has not been arrested. I am not sure on what basis that has slipped by the law officials.Was it because the individul was not in a public place? IT is scarey thta others will know this now. I am deeply ashamed of those people who do not see this as an extreme case of hate and who have found some loophole to let it go by. I worry about any champion of the poor in our racist country that is in great denial about its racism.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
train99 says:
Media will make a "close race" story out of this because they're afraid young on the the left will became complacent and not bother to vote.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dantom39 says:
Goodby Obama in 2012.
reply
rockerrick replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Oh you are dreaming! Obama will win big in 2012 and the right wing racists will gnash their teeth!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CaptainSmollett says:
Well, if Obama wins, at least I'll have the sadistic satisfaction of knowing his supporters will suffer that consequences of their ignorance and greed.
reply
Jaylah54200 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Whereas if Romney wins, only a majority of his supporters will suffer the consequences of their ignorance and greed. And the chosen few will get to live even higher off the hog than they are now.
rockerrick replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Oh you shallow right wing maggot! It is just your type of sentiment that has tried to ruin my country.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
formerlyluvnut says:
Yawnnnnnn. He'll win. Duh.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pcfogarty says:
It isn't that Romney is a sure shoe in but opposition to Obama is strong , even among so called liberal voters . I don't know how many people will be voting for Romney for the same reasons that I will , but I am voting for him because I know his policies will not do anything. In 4 years voters will be looking for someone else probably out of the Independent pool. I simply want to get him in office and then out of the way forever. Four years of uncoordinated and misguided policies will make his party look bad , but as a whole won't ruin the Nation in the same way that 8 years might.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
soap-suds says:
The Republican mantra is: "The Republicans screwed thing up; the Democrats have not been able to fix it yet; so you need to elect another Republican!" I wonder who really buys this; I am sure there are many.....
reply
CaptainSmollett replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well, if the Democrats have been unable to fix it, why continue to wander down the path of failure? Things are getting worse, not better.
soap-suds replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CaptainSmollett::::

Do not confuse progress with failure; all indices appear to be up to some extent, e.g. stock market! The failure was at the start.......
See all 6 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54200 says:
Doesn't mean he won't win, either. What a waffle-story.

As to Romney "consolidating the base", he can't. Nobody can. The "Republican" party has become so fractured that it's essentially two political parties now. If that weren't so, Romney would be leading in the polls and would win the election by a landslide.
reply
CaptainSmollett replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Don't underestimate how angry conservatives are. Polls don't reflect that. And ALL conservatives would prefer anyone over a proven liberal failure.
BothPartiesBite replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Funny the Democrat party has long been fractured into two parties. We call them Commies and Socialists.
See all 54 Comments