December 5, 2007 2:16 PM
- Text
Publishers Take On Google
Just weeks after a leading authors' organization sued Google Inc. for copyright infringement, the Association of American Publishers has also filed suit against the search engine giant's plans to scan and index books for the Internet.
Under the Google Print Library Project, millions of copyrighted books from five major libraries, including the University of Michigan and the New York Public Library, will be indexed on the Internet unless the copyright holder notifies the company by Nov. 1 about which volumes should be excluded. A few sentences from each book would be viewable, but could not be printed or downloaded.
Google has called the project an invaluable chance for books to receive increased exposure. The library project is an offshoot of the Google Print program, for which publishers voluntarily submit copyrighted material.
But in papers filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the publishers association sought a ruling that would support an injunction against illegal scanning and cited the "continuing, irreparable and imminent harm publishers are suffering ... due to Google's willful (copyright) infringement to further its own commercial purposes."
The suit named five publishers as plaintiffs: McGraw-Hill, Pearson Education, Penguin Group USA, Simon & Schuster and John Wiley & Sons. The suit seeks recovery of legal costs, but no additional damages.
Google, in a statement issued Wednesday, called the legal action "short-sighted" and said the project was a "historic effort to make millions of books easier for people to find and buy."
"Creating an easy to use index of books is fair use under copyright law and supports the purpose of copyright: to increase the awareness and sales of books directly benefiting copyright holders," David Drummond, Google's general counsel and vice president, corporate development, said in the statement.
© 2007 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Under the Google Print Library Project, millions of copyrighted books from five major libraries, including the University of Michigan and the New York Public Library, will be indexed on the Internet unless the copyright holder notifies the company by Nov. 1 about which volumes should be excluded. A few sentences from each book would be viewable, but could not be printed or downloaded.
Google has called the project an invaluable chance for books to receive increased exposure. The library project is an offshoot of the Google Print program, for which publishers voluntarily submit copyrighted material.
But in papers filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the publishers association sought a ruling that would support an injunction against illegal scanning and cited the "continuing, irreparable and imminent harm publishers are suffering ... due to Google's willful (copyright) infringement to further its own commercial purposes."
The suit named five publishers as plaintiffs: McGraw-Hill, Pearson Education, Penguin Group USA, Simon & Schuster and John Wiley & Sons. The suit seeks recovery of legal costs, but no additional damages.
Google, in a statement issued Wednesday, called the legal action "short-sighted" and said the project was a "historic effort to make millions of books easier for people to find and buy."
"Creating an easy to use index of books is fair use under copyright law and supports the purpose of copyright: to increase the awareness and sales of books directly benefiting copyright holders," David Drummond, Google's general counsel and vice president, corporate development, said in the statement.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Add A Comment +
Popular Now in SciTech
- Astronauts enter SpaceX supply ship
- Oxford requests Bigfoot samples for DNA testing
- Facebook required for Spotify account, here's a trick
- New telescope to be in S. Africa, Australia
- SpaceX capsule's historic space station success
- Microsoft to release four editions of Windows 8
- Prop. NY Law: Anti-bullying or anti-free speech?
- Apple MacBook Pro, iMac rumors: Ivy Bridge processor, USB 3, Retina Display
- Facebook Camera and Instagram, it's complicated
- Blazing "ring of fire" makes millions look to sky
- Mac virus: What you need to know
- Texting while walking banned in N.J. town
- Facebook to buy Opera browser? Rumors surface
- Man secretly lived at AOL office for two months
- 3D motion-control transforms the home computer
- How BDSM e-book "Fifty Shades of Grey" went viral






