AP/ December 2, 2012, 4:35 PM

Carbon dioxide emissions rise to 2.4 million pounds per second

Cars, trucks and other traffic clog the A100 ring road at rush hour February 21, 2007 in Berlin, Germany.

Cars, trucks and other traffic clog the A100 ring road at rush hour February 21, 2007 in Berlin, Germany. / Getty Images

WASHINGTON The amount of heat-trapping pollution the world spewed rose again last year by 3 percent. So scientists say it's now unlikely that global warming can be limited to a couple of degrees, which is an international goal.

The overwhelming majority of the increase was from China, the world's biggest carbon dioxide polluter. Of the planet's top 10 polluters, the United States and Germany were the only countries that reduced their carbon dioxide emissions.

Last year, all the world's nations combined pumped nearly 38.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the air from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil, according to new international calculations on global emissions published Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change. That's about a billion tons more than the previous year.

The total amounts to more than 2.4 million pounds of carbon dioxide released into the air every second.

Because emissions of the key greenhouse gas have been rising steadily and most carbon stays in the air for a century, it is not just unlikely but "rather optimistic" to think that the world can limit future temperature increases to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), said the study's lead author, Glen Peters at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, Norway.

Three years ago, nearly 200 nations set the 2-degree C temperature goal in a nonbinding agreement. Negotiators now at a conference under way in Doha, Qatar, are trying to find ways to reach that target.

The only way, Peters said, is to start reducing world emissions now and "throw everything we have at the problem."

Andrew Weaver, a climate scientist at the University of Victoria in Canada who was not part of the study, said: "We are losing control of our ability to get a handle on the global warming problem."

In 1997, most of the world agreed to an international treaty, known as the Kyoto Protocol, that required developed countries such as the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 5 percent when compared with the baseline year of 1990. But countries that are still developing, including China and India, were not limited by how much carbon dioxide they expelled. The United States never ratified the treaty.

The latest pollution numbers, calculated by the Global Carbon Project, a joint venture of the Energy Department and the Norwegian Research Council, show that worldwide carbon dioxide levels are 54 percent higher than the 1990 baseline.

The 2011 figures for the biggest polluters:

1. China, up 10 percent to 10 billion tons.

2. United States, down 2 percent to 5.9 billion tons

3. India, up 7 percent to 2.5 billion tons.

4. Russia, up 3 percent to 1.8 billion tons.

5. Japan, up 0.4 percent to 1.3 billion tons.

6. Germany, down 4 percent to 0.8 billion tons.

7. Iran, up 2 percent to 0.7 billion tons.

8. South Korea, up 4 percent to 0.6 billion tons.

9. Canada, up 2 percent to 0.6 billion tons.

10. South Africa, up 2 percent to 0.6 billion tons.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
57 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rick_Carter1 says:
Dead oceans = dead world. Oceanic acidification due to excessive CO2 production will eventually lead to the collapse of our global ecosystems. The oceans are the great renewer of life on our planet, but once our oceans are dead, our world is dead, too. This is all coming sooner than you think. Eventually mass starvation will correct the problem, but not before mass extinction has occurred. The short of it all? Be careful who you elect! - RC
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Noval53 says:
MAD science for money. That's the real agenda for the climate change chaos church. The world moves by oil and presently there are no realistic alternatives. To say otherwise is a fool's dream. Look around the room you sit in at your computer. Virtually everything you touch has moved by oil based fuel. Until you climate fanatics have a "real" alternative fuel (that the common man & woman can afford) to oil, we know your attacks on oil are primarily for the money.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WilliamTeach says:
First of all, if you are calling CO2 pollution, you're not discussing science, you're discussing politics.

Second, if Warmists want everyone to believe there is a crisis they need to act like there's a crisis, and start living the "carbon" neutral lifestyle.

Third, there has been no warming for 16 years. The seas aren't rising any more than within the historical norms. For the second straight year the world temperature has gone done. Europe and Asia are seeing cool temps and now an early winter.

Get over yourselves or practice what you preach.
reply
GossamerWings replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CBS News posted Scientists warn of rising sea levels in Florida Keys October 20, 2012. It stated "Top scientists say in the future, climate change will make flooding much worse. They drew up a map to illustrate the expected flood risk along Florida's coastline in 2060. The color red means "underwater". And Professor Ben Kirtman,of the University of Miami,says the long-term projections look much worse."By 2100, when sea level rise has been a full foot, I would say that 10 to 15 million people in Florida would have to be relocated," he said.


Where are you getting your information???? Please post source.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GossamerWings says:
Just maybe there is hope in new tech with solar, wind and Bill Gates. I found this "Liquid Metal Battery — a promising battery startup backed by Bill Gates, Khosla Ventures and oil giant Total — has changed its name to Ambri, a shorter and less literal word that's a nod to Cambridge, where the company was founded." I would love to find out when they can be ready for production. Love to know more for possible investing opportunities.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bar22mike says:
There is one simple yet glaring error with this article and it's the math because it doesn't compute.

If, as the story states, pollution amounted to 38.2 billion tons last year, then the amount placed into the air each second amounts to 1,211 lbs per second not 2.4 millions tons.
reply
mtracy99 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
New studies show that the world could get all of its energy needs with wind power alone. Solar is also coming on like gangbusters. Carbon dioxide emitting fuels are on their way out despite what the propagandists in the oil industry tell us.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bdbeans says:
Here's all you need to understand about global warming...

IF WE DON'T DEAL WITH IT THEN THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE IS EXTINCT IN 10 GENERATIONS.

The earth will eventually recover and return to it's natural state, we just won't be around to enjoy it.

DEBATE THAT.
reply
takacrat replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lets send China all of the dirty oil that we can find, like the oil from Canada, then when they burn it, it will be sent to the USA by the Jet Streams!!
royrogers1948 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There is no debate, we have to do something NOW!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
littlebuddyd says:
Stop worying and spending time and energy on something you can't control. You will never be able to stop it or reduce the poluting enough to make a difference. It reminds me of the kid who keeps yelling that the dam is gonna burst even after the water washes his home away. The most important thing we can do right now...right now...is to move everyone away from the coast and do not subsidize anymore desasters that happen on the coast. When the oceans rise...and they will rise...To late to stop that...we should PREPARE for THAT you idiots.
reply
mtracy99 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I have to go with the climate scientists on this one over superstitious preachers like Pat Robertson, or right-wing propaganda outfits like Fox News.
TimeToRetire replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NASA global warming guru James Hansen whom liberals like to quote told Obama in 2009 to go with more nuclear power.
See all 7 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
chevyhotrod says:
GossamerWings replies: linkicon reporticon emailicon Another clueless person! There is a natural component. But the CO2 accelerated warming is not natural and the slope is no longer gradual. Where do you get your information???? There is plenty on this check out NASA.

__________

Retired Award Winning NASA Atmospheric Scientist Dr. William W. Vaughan, recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Medal, a former Division Chief of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and author of more than 100 refereed journal articles, monographs, and papers, also now points to natural causes of recent climate changes. "The cause of these global changes is fundamentally due to the Sun and its effect on the Earth as it moves about in its orbit. Not from man-made activities," Vaughan told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on February 6, 2009

UN IPCC Scientist Dr. Steven M. Japar, a PhD atmospheric chemist who was part of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) Second (1995) and Third (2001) Assessment Reports, and has authored 83 peer-reviewed publications and in the areas of climate change, atmospheric chemistry, air pollutions and vehicle emissions, challenged the IPCC's climate claims.

"Temperature measurements show that the [climate model-predicted mid-troposphere] hot zone is non-existent. This is more than sufficient to invalidate global climate models and projections made with them!" Japar told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 7, 2009.

"I am appalled at the state of discord in the field of climate science...There is no observational evidence that the addition of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have caused any temperature perturbations in the atmosphere." - Award-winning atmospheric scientist Dr. George T. Wolff, former member of the EPA's Science Advisory Board, served on a committee of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and authored more than 90 peer-reviewed studies.
reply
GossamerWings replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That is funny because what you wrote is not on their website at this time. Give us a link to your information. This is the website that states man-made CO2 levels is causing it. http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
GossamerWings replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NASA doesn't support your view and this article doesn't blame it on the Sun from Live Science" The sun is to blame???


Myth: Over the past few hundred years, the sun's activity, including the number of sunspots, has increased, causing the world to get warmer.


Science: In the last 35 years of global warming, the sun has shown a slight cooling trend, while the climate has been heating up, scientists say. In the past century, solar activity can explain some of the increase in global temperatures, but a relatively small amount. (Solar activity refers to the activity of the sun's magnetic field and includes magnetic field-powered sunspots and solar flares.)

A study published in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics in December 2011 revealed that even during a prolonged lull in the sun's activity, Earth still continued to warm. The study researchers found that the Earth absorbed 0.58 watts of excess energy per square meter than escaped back into space during the study period from 2005 to 2010, a time when solar activity was low"

Check the EPA site and it doesn't blame the sun. Where did you get your information??? What publication????
linkicon reporticon emailicon
joesapper says:
Here comes a left wing carbon tax , along with a gas tax for cars with 6cyl or more .

But remember as the unemployment lines increase and tax hikes come out of the wood work , Pres Obama said taxes on the middle class would not go up.

Hard to pay taxes when you have no job .
reply
mtracy99 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There's nothing left-wing about trying to keep our children from baking from a hotter climate.
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Then talk to the Chinese and Indians. Children in the US will polute less than their parents
See all 6 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
uisignorant says:
Now if we could only get the volcanoes to stop...
reply
mtracy99 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If only we could get the right-wing preachers and politicians to stop with their superstitious nonsense that we have nothing to worry about because God is in control.
chevyhotrod replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
God controls nothing, the Sun is in complete control and we cannot do anything about it.
See all 57 Comments