By

William Harwood /

CBS News/ September 26, 2012, 9:38 AM

Hubble looks back 13.2 billion years in deepest view yet

The Hubble eXtreme Deep Field, made up of some 2,000 images taken over a decade, provides a stunning "time tunnel" capturing light from dim proto galaxies within 500 million years of the big bang.

The Hubble eXtreme Deep Field, made up of some 2,000 images taken over a decade, provides a stunning "time tunnel" capturing light from dim proto galaxies within 500 million years of the big bang. / NASA

(CBS News) A stunning new composite photograph from the Hubble Space Telescope, made up of more than 2,000 images shot by multiple cameras over the past 10 years and combined in what amounts to a 23-day time exposure, shows some 5,500 galaxies in tiny field of view, including some dating back to just 450 million years after the big bang birth of the universe, astronomers said Tuesday.

Dubbed the eXtreme Deep Field, or XDF, the photograph represents the deepest view of the universe yet achieved, giving astronomers a "time tunnel"-like glimpse back across 13.2 billion years of cosmic history.

"The XDF is the deepest image of the sky ever obtained and reveals the faintest and most distant galaxies ever seen," Garth Illingworth, a Hubble researcher at the University of California at Santa Cruz, said in a NASA statement. "XDF allows us to explore further back in time than ever before."

Earlier observations of pulsating Cepheid variable stars in remote galaxies allowed Hubble astronomers to conclude the universe is roughly 13.7 billion years old. The XDF photograph represents a look back across time from the present to within 450 million years of the big bang, showing the broad spectrum of galactic evolution in a single image.

Mature spiral galaxies that look similar to Earth's Milky Way and nearby Andromeda can be seen, along with spherical ellipticals and smaller, dimmer infant galaxies from much further back in time.

The Hubble eXtreme Deep Field is made up of images shot in the same small region of the southern Fornax constellation. The full moon is shown for comparison.

/ NASA

"So we [see] a time when the first galaxies were forming, the metals, all the elements that make our bodies, make the Earth and basically our whole solar system were starting to be built up in this time," said Illingworth. "So it was a time...when the universe was being transformed, the first galaxies were being built up, a dramatic time in the life of the universe."

The Hubble Space Telescope was aimed at a small patch of sky in the southern constellation Fornax where an earlier time exposure called the Ultra Deep Field was taken in 2003 and 2004. The UDF was made up of pictures taken during one million seconds of exposure time, or about two weeks.

"The Ultra Deep Field really allowed us to do things that were not possible before," said Marc Postman, an astronomer at the Space Telescope Science Institute. "We saw things that were much farther away than any previous observations had shown us, and also that the shapes and sizes of these galaxies were getting continuously smaller as they got farther away."

The XDF doubled the exposure time and, with the addition of a new camera in 2009, increased the telescope's sensitivity to infrared light. The new images, combined with Ultra Deep Field data, show some 5,500 galaxies in a smaller field of view. According to NASA, the faintest galaxies are one ten-billionth the brightness a human eye can detect.

The new camera "enabled us to take the next step in a slightly different range of the spectrum, a little redder," said Illingworth. "But we could actually take the two data sets and explore in ways we could never do before."

Hubble's much more powerful successor, the James Webb Space Telescope, is expected push back the frontier even more, capturing the red-shifted light of the first generations of stars and perhaps shedding light on the mystery of galaxy formation. The JWST is scheduled for launch around 2018.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • William Harwood

    Bill Harwood has been covering the U.S. space program full-time since 1984, first as Cape Canaveral bureau chief for United Press International and now as a consultant for CBS News. He has covered more than 125 shuttle missions, every interplanetary flight since Voyager 2's flyby of Neptune, and scores of commercial and military launches. Based at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, Harwood is a devoted amateur astronomer and co-author of "Comm Check: The Final Flight of Shuttle Columbia." You can follow his frequent status updates at the CBS News Space page.

26 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
HolisticDNA says:
Higgs Boson / "God Particle" -2012 Science news is actually a 150+ year old discovery by a different name ..................Infinite Intelligence....Steve Meyer / New Thought Movement / HolisticDNA

The Sixth Sense Activation Sequence - GROUNDBREAKING New Book in 2012!
"New Thought promotes the ideas that "Infinite Intelligence" or "God" is ubiquitous, and "right thinking" has a healing effect..." Wikipedia

Steve Meyer
HolisticDNA@gmail.com
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Zalmasri says:
The Image reminds me of the Koran / Quranic Verse. In Surrah "The Inevitable" 56.
Verse 75. I swear by the locations of the stars. 76. It is an oath, if you only knew, that is tremendous. 77. It is a noble Quran. 78. In a well-protected Book.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jonesylj says:
So, if Hubble is looking into the past how is the light from those galaxies just now reaching us? I thought the universe was expanding outward from the big bang. So if we are moving out from the center and that light is traveling at the speed of light and our Solar System and Galaxy is traveling much slower than light. How is that light catching up to us at all? Wouldn't it have passed us up billions of years ago? Am I missing a backwards worm hole effect somewhere? Someone please advise.
reply
enlightenu replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Expansion occurred much faster than the speed of light at the very beginning of the universe. Thus expansion has always had a head start, so to speak, but remember that the light being captured is within the universe, whereas expansion refers to a dynamic of the universe itself.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dave123173 says:
cant wate 4 woormhole
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
uberic says:
Dear Friends, There is something I don't understand and perhaps one of you can clarify. Essentially we are looking at a galaxy that is 13 billion years old, but we are seeing what it looked like 13 billion years ago and not what it looks like now. Is this correct? So what Hubble is showing us has no relation to current reality and therefore we really have no idea what the universe looks like at this current moment only what it looked like billions of years ago. It seems to me the age could not possibly be correct. The universe would have to be billions and billions of years older to be developed to the way we see it now, since the way we see it now is what it looked like when the light captured left its source. Full disclosure: I am a Christian, but not a Creationist. I beleive with God the possibilty of everything exists.
reply
thegolfguy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sounds like you have a pretty good grasp of the concept.
Think3Times replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If it doesn't exist already, I'm sure very soon this ever growing time lapse library of the universe as we look back in time, this data is already being, or is soon to be fed into a warehouse of supercomputers calculating and restructuring the universe according to how it would likely be in the present.

As we look farther away.. we see farther behind.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
aliantont says:
If I understand this article at all it should be possible for the Huble to look back further and further light years into unverse which means reaching the Big Bang at 13.7 billion years maybe I am wrong. If so somebody please correct me.

Recently we saw either the success or almost success of isolating the "god particle, a boson which allows massless particles created (hate that word)after the BIg Bang to acquire mass.

As physics advances there is less need to explain the universe through a creator. And isn't as feasible a theory that it the nature of the universe to exist just like supossedly it is God's. It is just that the universe is not conscious.

And I have wonder from the point of view of evolutionary biology if this intractable belief in religion which on the downside has caused the crusades, the inquision and jihads is not and adpation of social species. what better to achieve cohesion and obedience than to follow a gode that promises eternal life or will punish you with eternal. I myself can't believe in the divinity of any entity so vindictive not to mention so immature and with an ego greater than Tom Cruise's.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mysticpizza says:
If only we had the Starship enterprise to really explore it.
reply
Strangerthan_u replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Do your star trek research, in accordance to star trek lore, the furthest any star trek starship has traveled was 70,000 light years (voyager) and it (Would have) took 70 years to get back to earth. 13.2 billion light years is a very long trip...
mysticpizza replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
But but but I really love star trek and I would still volunteer to do it.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
The Hubble continues to be one of the most productive investments in space that the U.S. has made.
reply
enlightenu replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Just wait until JWST. It will be even more productive.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bigmanfrommaine says:
Wow, the Universe continues to amaze me at its enormity. The Earth is so tiny as to be inconsequential, except for us...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
honotonshijin says:
I imagine that any day now we will have an image of total blackness, the era before re-ionization occurred.
reply
enlightenu replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I think the image will be white with heat.
See all 26 Comments