Alien solar system looks a lot like our own

Three known exoplanets orbit the star Kepler-30 in a configuration that is similar to our solar system's. / Space.com

(SPACE.com) Astronomers have discovered an alien solar system whose planets are arranged much like those in our own solar system, a find that suggests most planetary systems start out looking the same, scientists say.

Researchers studying the star system Kepler-30, which is 10,000 light-years from Earth, found that its three known worlds all orbit in the same plane, lined up with the rotation of the star -- just like the planets in our own solar system do. The result supports the leading theory of planet formation, which posits that planets take shape from a disk of dust and gas that spins around newborn stars.

"In agreement with the theory, we have found the star's spin to be aligned with the planets," said study co-author Dan Fabrycky, of the University of California, Santa Cruz. "So this result is profound because it is basic data testing the standard planet formation theory."

Interactions among planets can later throw such ordered arrangements out of whack, researchers added, creating the skewed orbits seen in many alien systems today. [Gallery: The Strangest Alien Planets]

Planets crossing starspots

The Kepler-30 system consists of three known extrasolar planets circling a sunlike star. All three worlds -- Kepler-30b, Kepler-30c and Kepler-30d -- are much larger than Earth, with two being even more massive than Jupiter.

The three planets were detected in January by NASA's Kepler space telescope, which has spotted more than 2,300 potential alien worlds since its March 2009 launch. Kepler uses the "transit method," noting the telltale brightness dips caused when a planet crosses, or transits, a star's face from the telescope's perspective.

In the new study, the scientists studied Kepler observations of the extrasolar system even more closely.

Like our own sun, Kepler-30 has starspots, temporary blotches that appear dark because they're significantly cooler than the rest of the star's surface. The research team determined that all three planets transited the same starspot repeatedly, showing that their orbits must be coplanar and aligned closely with the star's spin.

In this sense, the Kepler-30 system looks like our cosmic neighborhood, which sports eight planets all lined up neatly along the sun's rotational equator. Both systems probably formed from a spinning disk of dust and gas, researchers said.

Not all exoplanet systems are so well-ordered. For example, many so-called "hot Jupiters" -- giant planets that sit very close to their host stars -- have off-kilter or even retrograde orbits. But hot Jupiters likely weren't born this way; rather, they were probably knocked askew by gravitational run-ins with other planets.

"We have excellent statistical properties of obliquities of stars that host hot Jupiters, and it seems to support the theories in which they are due to dynamical interactions among massive bodies," Fabrycky told SPACE.com via email.

The study appears online today (July 25) in the journal Nature.

More data needed

The research team stressed that the new study is a starting point of sorts. Astronomers will need more data to get a better handle on planet formation processes.

"Our work is suggestive, but we will need to observe a few more systems to show that indeed, for all coplanar systems similar to our own solar, the star's spin is aligned with the planets," said lead author Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda of MIT. "So far, we have the solar system and Kepler-30; a few more systems will be helpful to be completely sure."

Kepler should allow astronomers to study more such systems soon, Sanchis-Ojeda added.

"So far, we have identified between five and 10 new systems where we think we can apply this method, but the number is likely to grow while more data is processed," he told SPACE.com via email. "We are confident that we will be able to test our predictions in the next few years."

Follow SPACE.com senior writer Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall or SPACE.com @Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebook and Google+.

• Alien Planet Quiz: Are You an Exoplanet Expert?
• Gallery: A World of Kepler Planets
• Planets Large and Small Populate Our Galaxy (Infographic)

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

[rigambler]

The article reads: the stars spin is alinged with the planets.

Shouldn't it say that the planets spin in line with the stars spin?

[MagnaCartaUK]

Kepler 30 - a 'sunlike star like our own sun, with a similar solar system'. At times like this, one almost naturally ponders on the thought of how much that Kepler solar system is conducive to intelligent life. In that respect, I much prefer to consider the very recent C.B.S. article about the Gliese red dwarf planet orbitting a same-name red-dwarf star some 30 light years away, (though I could be wrong with the distance - aren't we all)? Given that particular red dwarf sun is a star much older than our own Sun, any orbitting planet with intelligent life would have had umpteen millions of years longer to have evolved to such a state. One can only wonder at the level of ultra-intelligence that's evolved in the time gifted to them. Could the same be said of this Kepler system? Perhaps not, given our own 'intelligent human World' revolving around a similar star to Kepler has only advanced to where it is in the space of just 1 million years, but who knows? I suppose informed curiosity will always migrate to older stars when considering the possibility of advanced life, and without wanting to sound like some exo-snob, surely it's understandable to do so. After all, haven't Red dwarf stars been specifically targetted in the past? As a final thought in my comment, and one that has a similarly tenuous connection to the actual subject, I recall a recent conversation about extra-terrestrial life and its impact with some fellow amateur astronomers in which a question was asked. Given only two choices, would you rather know what an advanced form of life looks like, or instead know only of their technological standards and all that it means? Most chose to know 'what they'd look like', which the rest could only determine as an example of how superficial we still are as a species. ... I'm afraid I was one of the superficial ones. Enjoy your astronomy anyway - and the sleep deprivation too!