By

Jennifer Welsh, LiveScience Staff Writer /

CBS News/ May 7, 2012, 2:35 PM

Dinosaur "gas" may have warmed prehistoric earth

(Livescience.com) We might want to rename the Brachiosaurus with the moniker Gassiosaurus, new research indicates. The gassy emissions from these giant dinosaurs may have been enough to warm the Earth, the researchers say.

Sauropods are large plant-eating dinosaurs typified by such titans as Apatosaurus (once known as Brontosaurus) and Brachiosaurus. When they lived, during the Mesozoic era - from about 250 million years ago until the dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago - the climate was warm and wet. Nothing on Earth today compares with these giants.

The researchers found that the greenhouse gas methane produced by all sauropods across the globe would have been about 520 million tons per year, a number on par with the total amount of methane currently produced by both natural and man-made sources. [Album: World's Biggest Beasts]

Questionable numbers

The researchers, led by David Wilkinson of Liverpool John Moores University in the United Kingdom, did their best to get an accurate estimate of how much gas these big dinosaurs would have created, but their answers are still just estimates based on multiple assumptions, they warn.

The greenhouse gas methane is a natural byproduct of the digestive process of plant eaters, especially in herbivores called ruminants (like cows and camels). The researchers suspect that like ruminants, sauropods would have harbored methane-producing bacteria in their intestines to help digest these fibrous foods.

There is currently no way to tell what kind of bacteria lived in the digestive systems of dinosaurs, what gasses they produced, or what those digestive systems would have looked like, but Wilkinson thinks they would have produced methane like today's animals.

"To process that amount of vegetation they have to be relying on microbes in their digestive system," Wilkinson told LiveScience. "But without a time machine you can't be sure."

Crunching gassy numbers

They used a mathematical model to determine how much gas these plant-eating giants would have eaten. They extended data on methane production by modern mammals, based on size, up into the reaches of the sauropods.

In their calculations the researchers used middle-of-the-road numbers: 10 sauropods, each weighing 20,000 pounds (9,071 kilograms), could have roamed 1 square kilometer of lush Mesozoic habitats. "We've taken a middle-ground value," Wilkinson said. "We tried to be reasonably conservative."

They found that these 10 sauropods would have contributed 7.6 tons (6.9 tonnes) of methane every year. Expanding this number to cover the amount of land estimated to be hospitable habitat for these animals (about half the land on Earth at the time), the researchers end up with more than 550 million tons (500 million tonnes) of methane produced every year.

"I was expecting a number like that produced by cows, so the size of the number really surprised me," Wilkinson said. "It's way, way, way ahead of the estimated methane production by modern livestock." (Cows produce 55 to 110 million tons (50 to 100 million tonnes) of methane each year, he estimated.)

Big eaters

It makes sense, based on the animal's huge size, that they would make much more methane per individual than a cow. But, there are several other reasons why these large dinosaurs could have produced so much more gas than modern herbivores.

The animals would have had plenty of plants to eat, because they could reach high and low, and because of the warm climate, there was plenty of vegetation; in addition, these animals had much vaster areas in which to graze.

The real question is, did these dinosaurs' gassy emissions warm the planet?

"The thing about methane is it is an extremely potent greenhouse gas," Wilkinson said. If the levels were anywhere near where their calculations indicate, he said, it very well could have been one of many factors that made that era warmer and wetter than modern times.

The study is detailed in today's (May 7) issue of the journal Current Biology.

You can follow LiveScience staff writer Jennifer Welsh on Twitter, on Google+ or on Facebook. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
14 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sailhardy1 says:
Maybe we should be thinking about putting caps on all anal apertures that are likely to emit methane. Write to your Congressmen/women immediately.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tmittelstaed says:
Sure fire funny is to go to the toilet, works every time!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ISEDIT says:
This article is an excellent example of "scientists" getting paid to laugh their heads off at the public after they hit 'send' on their press release. The info in the article says the researchers were 'conservative' in their estimates of the amount of methane 10 Sauropods would have produced while foraging in 1 square kilometer, and then multiplied those numbers by the areas of accessible vegetation around the world. Stop right there: imagine TEN giant creatures per square kilometers for EVERY square kilometer available. That is an absurd assumption for any animal larger than a cow. The The "scientists" came up with a figure of 72.3 MILLION Sauropods living at the same time to produce those 550 megatons of methane. Consider that that number is greater than most estimates of the American bison population at any time in history. And the larger the animal, the longer the gestation period, the longer the growth period until reproductive maturity, and the greater the susceptibility to environmental conditions affecting food sources, habitat, etc. I would say there were never more than 100,000 such giant leaf-eaters alive at once. NEVER 72 MILLION year after year!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tychicum says:
So Al Gore didn't invent Global Warming ... either? Back in 2002, then-premier of Alberta Canada, Ralph Klein, made a remark that maybe "dino farts" caused the ice age. Maybe he was right?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Heathergreeneyes says:
This article makes my hair hurt.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Heathergreeneyes says:
Dinosaur farting? OK.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Curly1844 says:
Global Warming during the time of dinosaurs? WOW! And that was before the time of man and their SUVs!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hypnotoad72 says:
And both UPS and USPS staff are always competent of what they do for their livings.

In short, what other idle fantasies can we write about today, hmm?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
des1961 says:
most idiot thing I have heard in a while.
reply
hypnotoad72 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So you heard a dinosaur fart?

Or, rather, I think you've read the most idiotic thing in a while...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
formerlyluvnut says:
Dinosaur "gas"??? Please. More like Oprah burping. THAT I could believe.
reply
See all 14 Comments