CBS/AP/ November 26, 2011, 9:29 AM

Mars rover Curiosity blasts off

Last Updated 10:17 a.m. ET

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - The world's biggest extraterrestrial explorer, NASA's Curiosity rover, rocketed toward Mars on Saturday on a search for evidence that the red planet might once have been home to itsy-bitsy life.

It will take 8? months for Curiosity to reach Mars following a journey of 354 million miles.

An unmanned Atlas V rocket hoisted the rover, officially known as Mars Science Laboratory, into a cloudy late morning sky. A Mars frenzy gripped the launch site, with more than 13,000 guests jamming the space center for NASA's first launch to Earth's next-door neighbor in four years, and the first send-off of a Martian rover in eight years.

NASA astrobiologist Pan Conrad, whose carbon compound-seeking instrument is on the rover, had a shirt custom made for the occasion. Her bright blue, short-sleeve blouse was emblazoned with rockets, planets and the words, "Next stop Mars!"

The 1-ton Curiosity — as large as a car — is a mobile, nuclear-powered laboratory holding 10 science instruments that will sample Martian soil and rocks, and analyze them right on the spot. There's a drill as well as a stone-zapping laser machine.

It's "really a rover on steroids," said NASA's Colleen Hartman, assistant associate administrator for science. "It's an order of magnitude more capable than anything we have ever launched to any planet in the solar system."

The primary goal of the $2.5 billion mission is to see whether cold, dry, barren Mars might have been hospitable for microbial life once upon a time — or might even still be conducive to life now. No actual life detectors are on board; rather, the instruments will hunt for organic compounds.

Curiosity's 7-foot arm has a jackhammer on the end to drill into the Martian red rock, and the 7-foot mast on the rover is topped with high-definition and laser cameras. No previous Martian rover has been so sophisticated or capable.

With Mars the ultimate goal for astronauts, NASA also will use Curiosity to measure radiation at the red planet. The rover also has a weather station on board that will provide temperature, wind and humidity readings; a computer software app with daily weather updates is planned.

Mars Science Laboratory set for Saturday launch (Bill Harwood)
How nuke power bested solar in latest Mars mission
CNET: How Curiosity will land on Mars

The world has launched more than three dozen missions to the ever-alluring Mars, most like Earth than the other solar-system planets. Yet fewer than half of those quests have succeeded.

Just two weeks ago, a Russian spacecraft ended up stuck in orbit around Earth, rather than en route to the Martian moon Phobos.

"Mars really is the Bermuda Triangle of the solar system," Hartman said. "It's the death planet, and the United States of America is the only nation in the world that has ever landed and driven robotic explorers on the surface of Mars, and now we're set to do it again."

Curiosity's arrival next August will be particularly hair-raising.

< /div>

In a spacecraft first, the rover will be lowered onto the Martian surface via a jet pack and tether system similar to the sky cranes used to lower heavy equipment into remote areas on Earth.

Curiosity is too heavy to use air bags like its much smaller predecessors, Spirit and Opportunity, did in 2004. Besides, this new way should provide for a more accurate landing.


1/2

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
27 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Scimajor says:
I curious (pun intended) why NASA decided yet again to send a probe/rover to Mars which does have instrumentation to look for life. Yet again all the instruments are designed to look for signs of a past climate which could have supported life. It's been established beyond reasonable doubt that Mars at one time was wet and that it currently has water on it in the form of ice.

Can we please stop preparing to prepare so we can prepare to prepare to look for life NASA? It's like a bad TV Scifi. "Prepare to go to light speed. Prepare to press the big red button.". Why not just say "Hey, let's go to light speed already.".
reply
Scimajor replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Arg! "I'm curious" rather than "I curious". My figers aren't awake yet.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
notredamegirl77 says:
I would rather see my tax dollars go to NASA instead of two wars we are not winning!! The space program brings countries together!!! This country has done enough warmongering and making other people's lives in these countries miserable. Get the troops home from these countries we had no right invading in the first place.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
shurch4truth says:
Exploration is always good - take Lewis and Clark - but it would be nice to know what the information will be used for after the $2,000,000,000 is paid.


Is it assumed that we are not smart enough to be told?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
shurch4truth says:
Dear CBS:

The below writing is incomplete. What is the whole story? Twin spacecraft? Earth's moon? When was or is that going to be launched?

"The Juno probe is en route to Jupiter, and twin spacecraft named Grail will arrive at Earth's moon on New Year's Eve and Day."
reply
notredamegirl77 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Go to the NASA website!!! Come on now!!!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taxchurches says:
Go, NASA!

Dunestrider's myopic viewpoint is pathetically common. There is NOTHING humans can do that is more important than space exploration. Not because of scientific, engineering or technical developments that people like Dunestrider couldn't do without---satellite communication, aircraft de-icing systems, temper foam, breathing apparatus for firefighters and freeze-drying techniques (though it's true that some products like Velcro and Tang are misattributed, as well as Dunestrider's Straw Man transistors and Teflon), for example. If you want to learn more about NASA's contributions to your lives, check out NASA's "Spin-Off" page.

The reason we must do space is because we're human and it's there and it's human to explore to the limits of our abilities. Space is just at the edge of our ability, a frontier, and it is only by braving our frontiers that humanity grows and develops. In strength and depth, I mean, not in size; we're plenty large enough. I mean philosophically and intellectually.

Consider, if we weren't fighting several meaningless wars, arguing over asinine political issues and drowning in our economic stupidity, if we were a healthy society, we'd be headed for space, and we'd be excited about the possibilities. But we can't wait until everybody is healthy enough to proceed with our inevitable future---there will always be prosaic naysayers like Dunestrider. The best we can do is leave them behind, to wallow in their mundane existence while the rest of us pursue mankind's destiny.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
js555554 says:
We should shut down all of this foolishness. Fire the thousands of subcontractors and however many NASA employees. We can use the money spent on science and technology used in projects like this to pay these peoples unemployment. Frees up more bodies for occupy wall street I guess. Demand for some more free stuff I guess. Government Bureaucrats perhaps to manage the free stuff giving.
reply
notredamegirl77 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Another uneducated idiot on the CBS forum!
Pleides_express replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Why don't you just go back to sleep while the rest of the world advnces? I have an idea you would rather give the money spent on this great endeavour to the 1% since you seem to have them on your mind.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cannuc says:
Valles Marineris was caused by a huge meteor on the other side. This inpact was so great that the molten core of MARS stopped spinning. as a result it's own Van Allen belt ceased to be. With the magnetic belt gone, its atmosphere dissipated and with it whatever life was there died. Google "how Mars died."
reply
Scimajor replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's one hypothesis.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oldman67 says:
Visit www.TheEconomicCollapse.com and see if this is were our tax dollars should be spent.
reply
Jim1900 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It is better than spending $3 trillion invading the wrong country as the Republicans like to do.
notredamegirl77 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I bet you support the useless wars we are fighting right now and all the while losing money doing so. We are not going to win those wars in the first place since the enemy can give a rats behind about the rules of war! I bet you are willing to throw money at the war machine, which is losing our young men and women every day. You would support that right? Stop these wars and the US will have money!!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dunestrider says:
It is a waste of money! You will hear common urban myths like, "oh, but the space program has given us so much in return, like Teflon and transistors". Do a little research and you will find both of these were developed LONG before the space program (Teflon: 1938; transistor: 1925). It is the marketplace (or the military) that has given us progress, not the "space program". If anything the space program lags behind: your iPhone is far more powerful than all of the space shuttle's computers put together.
reply
JRC_903 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes.. and the laptop i am writing this on is prehaps 1000000 times more powerful then the STS GPCs. So what? Where was the iphone when the IBM GPCs were being designed and built back in 1974/5. Kinda makes that a stupid comparsion doesn't it?
billpl-2009 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
yup, just keep thinking that...when India sets up a space station on the Moon in next few decades and we have to outsource to India, not because they're cheaper, but because they're better
See all 5 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Republicans_Lose_In_2012 says:
Did you see the way the vehicle is going to land?!!! Check it out!
reply
notredamegirl77 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It is very cool indeed!!! Love NASA!!!
See all 27 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right