By

Michelle Castillo /

CBS News/ February 4, 2013, 11:56 AM

Brain infection, not scarlet fever, may have caused Mary Ingalls' blindness

Dr. Beth Tarini, an assistant professor in the Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, decided to look into the cause of Mary Ingalls' blindness.

Dr. Beth Tarini, an assistant professor in the Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, decided to look into the cause of Mary Ingalls' blindness. / University of Michigan

It may have been a brain infection -- not scarlet fever -- that caused Mary Ingalls of "Little House on the Prairie" to go blind.

A new study published in Pediatrics on Feb. 4 shows that Laura Ingalls Wilder's older sister probably had viral meningoencephalitis, in which the brain and the meninges (the membranes that protect the central nervous system) become inflamed.

Dr. Beth Tarini, an assistant professor in the Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, said a conversation she had in medical school sparked her investigation into the cause of Ingalls' blindness. According to the beloved book series, Ingalls went blind in 1879 at the age of 14 due to scarlet fever.

"Since I was in medical school, I had wondered about whether scarlet fever could cause blindness because I always remembered Mary's blindness from reading the 'Little House' stories and knew that scarlet fever was once a deadly disease," Tarini said in a press release. "I would ask other doctors, but no one could give me a definitive answer, so I started researching it."

Tarini's team pulled up newspaper reports, Wilder's memoirs and letters and school registries for further evidence. Wilder wrote in her memoirs that her sister had become sick with head pains, had a high fever and went delirious. She then said that Ingalls' face looked "drawn out of shape," which her mother later told her was a stroke. As Mary recovered, her eyesight diminished. A doctor told the family "the nerves of her eyes had had the worst of the stroke and were dying, that nothing could be done." They also discovered a letter Wilder wrote to her daughter Rose describing her sister's "spinal sickness" (which she initially called spinal meningitis before crossing it out).

In addition, a local newspaper that reported on Ingalls' sickness said that "it was feared that hemorrhage of the brain had set in (sic) one side of her face became partially paralyzed." Furthermore, a register from 1889 listed the cause of the blindness as "brain fever," which was what meningoencephalitis was referred to in those days.

"Meningoencephalitis could explain Mary's symptoms, including the inflammation of the facial nerve that left the side of her face temporarily paralyzed and it could also lead to inflammation of the optic nerve that would result in a slow and progressive loss of sight," Tarini explained.

An actual stroke was ruled out because there was no evidence of Ingalls having any other paralysis. Bacterial meningoencephalitis was not the culprit because Ingalls' showed no sign of brain damage and would have had learning problems. However, Wilder wrote that her sister was very smart even after the blindness, eventually going to school for blind children. Also, because her blue eyes still remained "beautiful" according to Wilder, just an infection of the eye or eye tissues like orbital cellulitis or endophthalmitis were unlikely.

The study authors hypothesized that the editors may have changed the illness to scarlet fever, which was rampant between 1840 and 1883, because it was easier to understand. Scarlet fever is caused by an infection of group A Streptococcus bacteria, which also causes strep throat. A toxin created by the bacteria causes the red rash from which the disease got its name. While curable today, it was fatal in 15 to 30 percent of causes and was one of the top 4 causes of blindness until 1910, the authors noted.

"Laura's memoirs were transformed into the Little House novels. Perhaps to make the story more understandable to children, the editors may have revised her writings to identify scarlet fever as Mary's illness because it was so familiar to people and so many knew how frightening a scarlet fever diagnosis was," author Sarah S. Allexan, a medical student at the University of Colorado, said in a press release.

Dr. Bruce Hirsch, an infectious disease specialist at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y., told HealthDay he agreed that scarlet fever was not the illness that caused Ingalls to go blind, but was doubtful it was meningoencephalitis. He favored the illness being a viral sickness coupled with a high fever, which may have caused her to be dehydrated. This could have caused retinal vein occlusion, a condition where a blood vessel could have blocked a vein that supplies the eyes with blood.

"If meningoencephalitis caused enough nerve damage to blind you, it would be unusual for it to just hit that part of the brain without causing a more general injury," he said.

Tarini said whatever the cause, the study highlights that even sicknesses written about in childhood books can affect our perception of a disease.

"Familiar literary references like these are powerful -- especially when there is some historical truth to them." Tarini says. "This research reminds us that our patients may harbor misconceptions about a diagnosis and that we, as physicians, need to be aware of the power of the words we use -- because in the end, illness is seen through the eyes of the patient."

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
24 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Tarawyn says:
Hmmm, If the good doctor had read the book she would have noticed that Mary Ingalls contracted the "hard measels" not
Scarlette fever. The whole family contracted the virus except Laura, who helped nurse the family back to health. I'm not a doctor but even I know that the hard measels was a dangerous virus that caused blindness, deafness and other horrendous outcomes. That is why children today and for several generations now are vaccinated for this lethal virus.......
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tmittelstaed says:
I think this is a great story. The fact is that the Little House books are basically propaganda written by Laura to not only make money but because when Laura wrote them she was much older and lived in a modern world, one that was almost 180 degrees a polar opposite then what she wrote in her books - and she hated it.

Laura was the barefoot and pregnant woman back on the farm writing columns basically telling all other woman to go back to the farm and be barefoot and pregnant.

Not once in the Little house books does Laura even touch on the fact that the farmers and settlers percolating into the west were utterly destroying the Indian culture.

Farmers in her books are the only ones who truly own, value & deserve the land - because they are extracting resources from it. People like Indians who lived with the land and hunted and gathered don't deserve the land as much as the farmers. Ironically her family lived off hunting game in between harvests, and her father was never a prosperous farmer, not until much later when the kids were grown and gone and the books ended.

Laura also ignored slavery completely, even though the Homestead Act which the family took advantage of, was designed specifically to prevent the formation of gigantic farms - plantations - since Lincoln knew that slave labor was only economical on the plantations. That was why the Southern states had always opposed passage of the Homestead Act.

Ma's brother was killed at Shiloh, and Pa's brother Hiram joined the Union army and served. These are facts that were ignored.

In Laura's Little House world, she completely ignores the political environment that formed it - if Slavery had not been an issue in the United States, the Homestead Act would never have been passed and there would have been no pioneer land rush. And in fact the Pioneer land grab wasn't economically sustainable anyway, as within a century the small farms envisioned by the Homestead Act had mostly been bought up by the large corporate agribusinesses that we have today - those businesses today work their land exactly as the old Southern slaveholder plantation owners did except that they use machines and not people, today.

Without slavery Pa Ingalls would never have been able to afford to move west and become a farmer. The family would have grown up in the city most likely.

Most readers of the Little house books do not realize they are fictional, they are not true retellings of the actual events of Laura's childhood. Stories like this news story are always a shock to many people because it informs them that the Little House books aren't reality - and the pseudo reality that Laura wrote about never really did exist as she said it did.

There's an old saying if you want a lie accepted always plant a little truth in it - the Little House books take this adage to heart - there are true bits and pieces in them - but they are mixed up with a rose colored view of how good the "pioneer farmer" really was, and how good a life pioneer farming really was.
reply
jenpurlteach replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
These were stories for very young readers, and that is probably the reason none of these issues were addressed in the books. The first books are something like a second grade reading level. Can you imagine discussing the Homestead Act with a seven year old? The stories were also told through a child's eyes, a child who was isolated and naive to all these political goings-on. Most of the book is about daily living and the adventures to be had in rural life. Relax. This article was about a medical issue of one of the beloved characters, and it's interesting to look back on such things with more modern medical knowledge.
justonemom10 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Chip on your shoulder much?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SheilaVG1 says:
I sort of remember the TV show though was not into the books and on the TV show I don't believe they had even an illness preceding the blindness. I think they said it was what we now call retinal detachment.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ginobaducci says:
The researcher forgot to mention that all of the Ingalls children suffered from Type 1 (juvenile) diabetes. NOT type II diabetes mellitus. I read it was genetic and "ran in their family" Wonder if Mary's blind condition and/or any type illness was exacerbated by her diabetic condition?
and OMG...kids were allowed to catch measles? let alone they LIVED to tell the tale??? LOL
reply
TMGT1Mama replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I'd love to know where you read that the kids all had type 1 diabetes, as there is no way that is true. Insulin wasn't available until 1922, and before that I believe the life expectancy of a person with type 1 diabetes was about two years.
lunch-lady1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I know that Carrie had diabetes in her later years, but I never heard of the others suffering from it. I learned about Carrie from some books that I bought at the Laura Ingalls Wilder House in Mansfield, Mo. There is a set of books that tells the REAL story of the Ingalls family.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JJ-JM says:
Who gives a rats !
reply
skaty23 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If you don't care, why bother reading it? Or taking the time to post such an asinine comment?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Shumanitutonkaobwachi says:
If you read a biography about Laura Ingalls Wilder, you will find that Mary had a stroke after both she and Laura had measels. Since Laura stated that Mary never fully recoved from the measels, the more likely cause is encepalitis caused by the measels. Truly a viral enchepaltis, but not caused by scarlet fever. Laura, I believe, used Scarlet Fever because more people were familiar with the complications of this disease during the period in which she was writing, than with the rare complication Mary suffered.Since Mary died of multiple strokes, it is likely that she was susceptible to vascular problems.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
albertinamel says:
@LCAPLAN96
"Ingalls' having" is completely correct. You use the possessive when followed by the gerund as a noun. E.G. "Please excuse my being late." Unfortunately, too many people say, "Please excuse me being late," which is patently incorrect. http://www.getitwriteonline.com/archive/022205posscasegerunds.htm
reply
lcaplan96 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"Having" is not a gerund. "Being" is a gerund. It describes what a person is-- "To be" as in Iam, He is, they are, etc. "Having" is a possessive verb. For example: "He is having a fit". What is he having? He is having a fit. An example of "being": He is being stupid. What is hae being? He is being stupid.
tommary1962 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You get a triple F for being petty, arrogant and incorrect.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
54217-5322 says:
I have the complete the series of books and DVD's. I have done research on line as well as visited Pepin, WI the Birthplace of Laura and Walnut Grove, MN. There I was able to read several letters, family photos, as well as family artifacts including pictures of relatives. I learned that the DVD Series is different than what was actually portrade. I figured they did that for the exitement of the story line. My first reaction was of disappointment. While at the Museum I purchased DVD Beyond the Praire: The True Story Of Laura Ingalls Wilder. This helped me grasp the situation. My husband and I are planning to visit other Museums in Springfield, MN, DeSmet and South Dakota. Eventually, I would really like to make it to Rocky Ridge Farms in Mansfield, MO. There are Eight Museums in all.
reply
lunch-lady1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I have been to the Laura Ingalls Wilder Home in Mansfield,MO. and it is definatley worth seeing. I heard that they have recently renovated the Rock house that Rose Wilder built and that it will also be open for tours. I'm looking forward to going back to see it :)
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dansarah0_dotmac says:
"discovered that Wilder's wrote", "Bacteria meningoencephalitis", "no evidence of Ingalls' having" -- Better get some basic copyediting done on this story.
reply
lcaplan96 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I am an English teacher. All of the copy is correct as written, except for the incorrect spelling of the word "cases".
Each of your corrections are incorrect. The first point was correct. The past tense is used to refer to the book that WAS written. The present tense is only used when examining the contents of the book as written, as in a book report for instance. The second point is also correct. It is call "Bacterial". I checked this with my father, who is a doctor. The third point is also correct. The name is Ingalls. It does not require a possesive, for you cannot possess "HAVING". Finally, copy editing ia two words, not one; a sentence shoul end with a period; the list of incorrect corrections should FOLLOW the introductory sentence. YOUR GRADE IS F.
lcaplan96 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
My grade is also F, because I didn't proofread well and incorrectly wrote "called" and "is".
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jkjdjjmjj says:
And this affects us now how???? Think about it, they really have no idea and to think that some researchers wasted all of this time on this???
reply
Genericuserprofile replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes it is really sad and criminal when someone exhibits a little intellectual curiosity these days. Perhaps you would should just stick to reality TV if something like this gets your undies in a bundle.
Shaefil replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
How does it affect us? Studying how authors described illnesses can help us figure out what diseases our ancestors had. And that affects us because many diseases are inheritable. I, for instance, am the only person in my family to have been diagnosed with lupus, but in looking at our family tree, we've found a great-grandmother who very likely had rheumatoid arthritis, which is related to lupus. Also another relative had a blood disorder which runs in my family - long before doctors even knew what it was. But now we recognize the symptoms that she had, and we can see that the blood disorder must have come from that particular branch of the tree.
See all 24 Comments