By

Ryan Jaslow /

CBS News/ January 30, 2013, 5:08 PM

Obesity prevented by breast-feeding, sex burns calories are myths, say researchers

Obesity is a primary target for public health advocates keen on reducing an American "epidemic" in which more than one-third of U.S. adults and approximately 17 percent of kids and adolescents are obese.

Advocates often tout ways for people to reduce their risk for obesity, such as by eating healthily and setting weight loss goals, or they may support risk prevention for future generations, such as by recommending breast-feeding to new moms or exercise habits at young ages.

A new study, however, says some of these long-held recommendations are nothing more than myths.

"False and scientifically unsupported beliefs about obesity are pervasive," study author Dr. David Allison, associate dean for science in the School of Public Health at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, said in a written statement. "As health professionals, we should hold ourselves to high standards so that public health statements are based on rigorous science."

For the study, published online Jan. 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine, Allison and his team conducted Internet searches of popular media and scholarly scientific papers, to come up with a list of obesity-related myths that could have widespread public health implications if believed. The researchers identified seven myths they said were not scientifically-backed by evidence.

One myth researchers busted was that losing lots of weight rapidly may cause the weight to come back one day, whereas slow, gradual weight loss will accumulate over time to produce longer-lasting changes. The researchers found evidence that people who lose more weight rapidly are more likely to weigh less, even after several years.

34 Photos

Fattest states in U.S. by 2030

The oft-told advice that people should set realistic weight loss goals or else they'll become frustrated and not lose weight -- advice that may be especially prevalent around New Year's -- is a myth, according to the study, which cited data that people may actually do better with more ambitious goals.

Other major myths busted include the idea that breast-feeding may reduce a child's risk for obesity. The researchers say this myth has been "passionately defended" for more than a century, but while breast-feeding may offer benefits to both mom and baby, evidence does not suggest preventing obesity is one of them.

That old adage that having sex is just like exercise, causing people to lose 300 calories? The researchers found people would be lucky to burn one-twentieth of that during sex, which offers about the same calorie expenditure from sitting on a couch, the researchers said. For example, a 154-pound man in his early-to-mid 30s who has sex for six minutes will expend about 21 calories during intercourse, they wrote.

Rounding out the busted myths were:

  • Myth: Small, sustained changes in how many calories we take in or burn will accumulate to produce large, long-term weight.

In fact, small changes in calorie intake or expenditure do not accumulate over time, the researchers said, and changes in body mass eventually cancel out changes in calorie intake or burning.

CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook explains that this myth is based off the idea that 3,500 calories equal one pound of fat, which means eating 100 fewer calories or burning 100 more calories each day over the course of a year (365 days) would amount to 10 pounds in lost weight.

"But many people don't realize that as calorie intake goes down and weight comes off, the body does the metabolic equivalent of turning down the furnace. It lowers the number of calories it burns each day in the course of normal living, and that makes it harder to keep losing" weight, LaPook told CBSNews.com.

That makes sense in terms of evolution, he added, because the body is prevented from using up fat stores when food is scarce.

"That may be good during famines but it's bad when food is plentiful and overweight people are trying to lose weight," LaPook said. "This may be a painful truth for my patients but I try to explain it so they will have more realistic expectations."

  • Myth: Patients who feel "ready" to lose weight are more likely to make the required lifestyle change, so health-care professionals need to measure each patient's diet readiness.

The researchers found readiness neither predicts weight loss nor helps to make it happen among those seeking weight-loss treatment after reviewing five studies.

  • Myth: Physical education classes play an important role in reducing and preventing childhood obesity.

Physical education, as typically provided, does not appear to counter obesity, according to the study. While physical activity could prevent or reduce obesity, the researchers said it may not be plausible to reach the duration and intensity required for weight loss at school.

In addition to busting myths, the researchers also found six "presumptions" that they say are widely believed but need more studies before drawing conclusions about weight gain.

Have you ever heard that skipping breakfast may lead to obesity? The researchers found two studies that found no obesity risk reduction from eating breakfast. Many advocates argue that eating a diet full of fruits and vegetables can bring about weight loss. But while extra veggies may bring health benefits, the researchers say simply stocking up on produce in the absence of other behavioral changes won't lead to weight loss.

Public health advocates often push for community-based weight loss interventions, such as building more parks or sidewalks, but studies that suggest a benefit have only been observational and don't show cause-and-effect, leading researchers to also call that a presumption.

There is also no rigorous evidence that learning exercise and eating habits as a child will influence weight gain throughout life, nor is there proof that snacking contributes to weight gain or obesity.

"Even observational studies have not shown a consistent association between snacking and obesity or increased BMI," the researchers write.

"From social media outlets like Facebook, to mainstream television news to dietetics and nutrition textbooks, these myths are perpetuated, irrespective of the scientific evidence," said study co-author Dr. Krista Casazza, an assistant professor in the department of nutrition sciences at the UAB School of Health Professions. "As scientists, we have the responsibility to present the evidence as it exists without inflating ideas and contributing to popular misconceptions. As a registered dietitian, I feel that providing evidence-based statements about weight loss is essential."

Then what about obesity do the researchers consider "fact?"

While genetics play a large role in obesity risk, the authors say it's a fact that heredity does not mean destiny, and environmental changes can lead to weight loss. Dieting, or reducing the number of calories you eat, is an effective way to lose weight but recommending that someone go on a diet generally does not work well for them in the long-term. This may sound obvious, the researchers wrote, but people who switch to eating healthier foods won't lose weight unless they take other actions to reduce their calorie intake.

Play Video

Academy seeks to save children from obesity

Also, the researchers say it's a fact that exercise increases health, and enough of it could aid in long-term weight loss. Using meal-replacement products in a structured program also appears to be associated with more weight loss than holistic approaches based on moderation and variety, they added. Pharmaceutical weight loss agents and bariatric surgery can also lead to meaningful weight loss, they found.

Lastly, overweight children are more likely to shed pounds if the whole family is involved, the researchers found evidence to support.

"This is an especially compelling article for me as a practicing physician because it highlights the friction between 'belief' and 'evidence-based medicine,'" said Dr. LaPook. "It's hard to think of another area of health where there are more devoutly held beliefs with little or no objective support from well-designed studies."

The study was partly funded by the National Institutes of Health. Several of the researchers also disclosed financial relationships, some of which included payments or grant support from Coca-Cola, Kraft Foods, McDonald's Global Advisory Council, Vivus and Arena Pharmaceuticals -- makers of two obesity drugs that recently got FDA approval -- and Jenny Craig.

"It raises questions about what the purpose of this paper is" and whether it's aimed at promoting drugs, meal replacement products and bariatric surgery as solutions, Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition and food studies at New York University, told the Associated Press.

"The big issues in weight loss are how you change the food environment in order for people to make healthy choices," such as limiting soda sizes or junk food marketing to children, she said.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Ryan Jaslow On Google+ »

    Ryan Jaslow is CBSNews.com's health editor.

22 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
magnumdr says:
Yet another comment on the sex we have here in the USA. Isn't anything supposed to be personal anymore?.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nz_testing says:
I don't really know why people make this issue so complicated, but I agree with the theory that since Americans lack a strong culture, they look to science and "medical professionals" to dictate their health and eating decisions. Unfortunately, that approach is mainly the cause of the health crisis we see today. For example, we were told to favor margarine and refined vegetable oils over traditional fats like butter, advice which turned out to be terrible. The government, media, and medical professionals talk about antioxidants, calorie counts, saturated fat, and fiber; the list goes on and on. Scientists want to isolate every nutrient and think they are so advanced to give people nutrition advice. The fact is nutrition science is very young and is nearly useless. The best and simplest advice is to simply eat whole, unprocessed foods. This will almost assuredly result in improved health and weight management. Granted, the industrial dairy products of today are not the same as the raw, grass fed dairy products of 200 years ago, but if you just buy the best you can afford, you should be okay. :)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nmcdny says:
Smooth move... write a sensible article looking at the evidence versus the ideology of food, then imply that it's trumped up because of who funded it and wheel out Marion Nestle to reassert the dogma.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MaxK341 says:
This article does not address one of the major contributors to weight gain, and that is hypothyroidism. It's caused by halogens (fluorine, chlorine and bromine) added to processed foods and dictated to be added to our tap water. When halogens are present they occupy receptor sites in th thyroid gland. In that case, when iodine is ingested the thyroid rejects it and it is eliminated from the body. The thyroid slows metabolism. The result is that less energy from food is used and the excess is stored as fat. Treat and cure the thyroid and weight will be lost.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
radfatty says:
This article is a case of bait and switch, where they point out myth-busting facts then end up promoting (emphasis on promoting) weight loss via structured programs (including meal replacements), pharmaceuticals, extreme exercise and weight loss surgery as "facts" in how to battle obesity and weight maintenance. This article only goes to promote industries that are making money off the backs of socially stigmatized people.

Stigma and discrimination of people based on their physical appearance or body size is resulting in physiological reactions to this stress. The pressure to reduce their body size in not only extremely difficult, if not impossible, it is BAD FOR THEIR HEALTH.

It is has been shown that diets fail 95% of the time resulting in "weight cycling". With weight loss surgery, beyond the regain of weight, there are so many complications to weight loss surgeries that may result in death, vitamin and micronutritional deficiencies that result, along with depression and suicide.

WEIGHT does not equate HEALTH.

If you truly want to promote HEALTH, check out information on Health At Every Size (R). For more information on Health At Every Size, you can find a general explanation on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_at_Every_Size) or find in-depth research-based information in the book Health At Every Size - The Surprising Truth About Your Weight by Dr. Linda Bacon (http://www.lindabacon.org/HAESbook/).
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
foo8259 says:
Here are some more MYTHS: "A calorie is a calorie is a calorie." "Eat less, exercise more." "There are no bad foods, only bad portions." "Breakfast is the most important meal of the day." "Eating fat makes you fat."

The following are not a MYTH: "To stay FAT count calories, to stay FLAT count carbohydrates." "Growing old is normal, feeling tired is not." -- Dr. Robert Atkins.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
skithebumps says:
So who has sex to lose weight anyway? Seems to me sex is its own reward.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
frankie2fing says:
Wow! 6 minutes guys? I think I was done in 6 minutes when I was a teenager... If its not 10 times that, I might as well not get undressed, guess I spoil my wife, may have to have a talk...
reply
pedalit replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
50 minutes of foreplay doesn't count
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tmonta67 says:
A relief to see the article reworked;better this morning but just to be picky:

"CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook explains that this myth is based off the idea that 3,500 calories equal one pound of fat," <----to be based ON something, IN a place, ....<sigh>

When I think back to my school years and how absolutely tyrannical my English teachers were about grammar and preserving the structure of our language,it's more than sad to see articles full of errors make it to publication.

<grumpy's off for more coffee>
reply
twmat311 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Even better: isn't a 4 year college degree mandatory to get work like this? English, writing, and spelling skills must be optional.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Scimajor says:
Weight loss, at it's heart, is a simple matter of mathematics. You simply take the number of calories you take in during the day and the number of calories that your body burns everyday and subtract the two. A positive number means that you will gain weight. A negative number means that you will lose weight.

Of course it's a little bit more complex that but not much. Some people naturally burn more calories in a day given the same amount of activity as another person. Also, some people process their food more or less efficiently than others making the raw number of calories taken significantly more than the actual number of calories processed by the body. There are plenty of studies showing a significant genetic component to both of these complications.

None of the above complications, however, alter the simple fact that lowering your caloric intake WILL either reduce your weight or reduce your weight gain. Also, if you eat fewer calories (those actually processed by your body) than your body naturally burns (tough to get an exact number here), you WILL lose weight.

Counting calories works. You simply can't refute simple addition.

There are some really wonderful smartphone apps that make it quick and easy.
reply
foo8259 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The body is not a calculator. It's not about counting -- it's about macro-nutrients, or what you eat not how much you eat. I was glad to see they they realize now cutting out a cookie a day will save you five pounds by the end of the year LOL!
See all 22 Comments