Company claims its decongestant can't be used to make meth

ST. LOUIS Several pharmacies in the St. Louis area are selling a new pseudoephedrine-based decongestant made by a local company that claims the drug cannot be used to make methamphetamine.

Pseudoephedrine, which can be found in cold and allergy pills, is a vital precursor for most meth recipes. Missouri has been especially hard hit by the meth epidemic, leading the nation in meth lab seizures every year but one since 2003.

Emilie Dolan, spokeswoman for Highland Pharmaceuticals, said Tuesday that the suburban St. Louis company spent years coming up with a form of pseudoephedrine that couldn't be used in meth production, resulting in Zephrex-D. A key to making meth is crystallization, and Dolan said Zephrex-D interrupts the process because rather than crystallizing when heated with the chemicals, it results in a gooey substance.

The federal Drug Enforcement Agency had been reviewing the drug, but the status of its testing wasn't immediately clear Tuesday. The agency didn't return a phone message from The Associated Press.

Federal law requires stores to keep pseudoephedrine-based products behind the counter, and two states, Mississippi and Oregon, require a prescription. In Missouri, there is no statewide prescription law, but more than 70 cities and counties have adopted their own prescription ordinances.

Dolan said some have agreed to exempt Zephrex-D from the prescription requirements, and the company is working with the others for exemptions. The drug began appearing on some pharmacy shelves in the last week or so, mostly in the St. Louis area, and Dolan said it could be distributed nationally within a year.

Jason Grellner, a narcotics officer in Missouri's Franklin County, has long been advocating for the technology. Earlier this year, he told a Missouri House committee, "This is an option that ends clandestine meth labs," but still gives people access to pseudoephedrine.

Elizabeth Funderburk of the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, which represents large pharmaceutical companies, raised concerns about Highland seeking local exemption rather than blanket approval from the DEA. But she said her organization is "interested in any methods to prevent abuse and hope this proves to be an effective path forward."

[_MikeBudd]

The debate between opponents and proponents of a prescription mandate for pseudoephedrine has been tough as each side had good points: law enforcement officers want to protect themselves from this very dangerous drug (they risk their lives when cleaning up meth labs) and doctors or health professionals in general want to protect the rights of honest patients who can't get by without pseudoephedrine, especially low income patients who shouldn't have to pay more to get their medication. In a sense, it's a pity that a drug can oppose the interests of 2 groups of honest citizens, drug agents and honest patients, only because pseudoephedrine is the best medicine we have, but unfortunately also a precursor to methamphetamine... I hope that a solution will come from these new meth-deterring products, Zephrex-D presented here, and also another one, Nexafed: http://ephedrinewheretobuy.com/new-meth-proof-ephedrine-for-sale
If the new ephedrine-based medications are safe and effective, we could have a win-win for drug agents and patients as well.

[rwsmith29456]

Maybe turning the gooey substance into Meth is more difficult but I wouldn't say impossible with more chemical processing.

[djseavy]

Funderburk ought to stop worrying about the DEA's long and drawn out formalities and be happy an alternative has been achieved. If our leaders are truly for winning the war on drugs, this new form should be fast tracked through the system and on the shelves as quickly as possible. I've long felt that some of the billions the government seizes every year should go toward helping drug manufacturers research meds that can't be converted, rather than the money simply disappearing into some catch-all fund. We often hear about these seizures, yet little is said where the money actually ends up. Has to make one wonder how serious the gov really wants to shut down the drug trade.