CBS/AP/ October 17, 2012, 12:02 PM

What contaminated the steroid injections involved in US meningitis outbreak?

Was it some moldy ceiling tiles? The dusty shoes of a careless employee? Or did the contamination of steroid injections tied to a nationwide fungal meningitis outbreak ride in on one of the ingredients?

There are lots of ways fungus could have gotten inside the Massachusetts compounding pharmacy whose injections has been linked to the lethal outbreak that has sickened more than 230 people in 15 states, killing 15 people as of Oct. 16, 2012.

The Virginia Department of Health noted another death last night, potentially raising the total to 16.

20 Photos

Is meningitis in your state?

Nearly all the victims had received steroid injections for back pain, but officials have noted many people may have received the injections for pain in other joints, such as their ankles, knees, hips or shoulders.

Federal and state investigators have been tightlipped about any problems they may have seen at the New England Compounding Center or whether they have pinpointed the source of the contamination. They did disclose last week that they found fungus in more than 50 vials from the pharmacy. Boston U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz also said her office is investigating the allegations as well, but warned people not to jump to conclusions.

"I think that it is entirely premature to suggest what the results of the investigation will be," Ortiz said in a statement to CBS News.

Company spokesman Andrew Paven said by email that criminal investigators from the Food and Drug Administration were at the pharmacy in Framingham, Mass., on Tuesday. The visit was part of a broad federal and state investigation of the outbreak, FDA spokesman Steven Immergut said in an email.

New England Compounding has not commented on its production process or what might have gone wrong, so outside experts can only speculate. But the betting money seems to be on dirty conditions, faulty sterilizing equipment, tainted ingredients or sloppiness on the part of employees.

The drug at the center of the investigation is made without preservative, meaning there's no alcohol or other solution in it to kill germs such as a fungus. So it's very important that it be made under highly sterile conditions, experts said.

Compounding pharmacies aren't as tightly regulated as drug company plants, but they are supposed to follow certain rules: Clean the floors and other surfaces daily; monitor air in "clean rooms" where drugs are made; require employees to wear gloves and gowns; test samples from each lot.

The rules are in the U.S. Pharmacopeia, a kind of national standards book for compounding medicines that's written by a non-profit scientific organization. Most inspections, though, are handled by state boards of pharmacy. Massachusetts last inspected New England Compounding in March in response to a complaint unrelated to the outbreak; the results have not been released.

High-volume production of the sort that went on at New England Compounding also raises the chances of contamination, experts said.

Traditionally, compounding pharmacies fill special orders placed by doctors for individual patients, turning out maybe five or six vials. But many medical practices and hospitals place large orders to have the medicines on hand for their patients. That's allowed in at least 40 states but not under Massachusetts regulations.

Last month, New England Compounding recalled three lots of steroids made since May that totaled 17,676 single-dose vials of medicine - roughly equivalent to 20 gallons. Up to 14,000 people may have received the injections, health officials have said.

"I don't see it as appropriate for a community pharmacy to do a batch of something preservative-free in numbers in the thousands" of doses, said Lou Diorio, a New Jersey-based consultant to compounding pharmacies. Diorio, who has no connection to the investigation or the company, said it is harder to keep everything sterile when working with large amounts.

To make the steroid, a chemical powder from a supplier is mixed with a liquid, sterilized through heating, then pumped into vials, according to Eric Kastango, another consultant from New Jersey who helps compounding pharmacies deal with contamination problems. He is not connected to the company either.

Perhaps the powder was contaminated, either at New England Compounding or another location. Maybe the fungus was in the liquid, some experts said.

Kastango offered additional possible scenarios, related to the large volume produced: Making thousands of doses at a time can take many hours or days. It's possible that a batch could sit for hours or even a day or so before being placed in vials, making it vulnerable to contamination, he said.

It's also likely a pharmacy worker would take a break to get a snack or cup of coffee, to go to the bathroom or to step outside for a smoke, Kastango explained. If the person hurried back and didn't properly wash up or put on new gowns, masks and other safety garb, that could introduce contamination.

Faulty or misused sterilizing equipment is also a possibility. After a 2002 fungal meningitis outbreak linked to a South Carolina compounding pharmacy, investigators discovered that a piece of sterilizing equipment called an autoclave had been improperly used by the staff.

The types of fungus in the latest outbreak are ubiquitous: The first to be identified was Aspergillus, commonly found indoors and outdoors. As more testing of patients was completed, it became clear that another fungus - a black mold called Exserohilum - caused most of the illnesses. Exserohilum is common in dirt and grasses.

Most people do not get sick from ordinary exposure to these kinds of fungus, but spinal injections can provide them a pathway into the brain. Doctors are generally leery of using spinal steroid injections that contain preservatives because of fears the preservatives themselves can cause side effects.

Whatever happened at New England Compounding, it probably wasn't unique.

Just last year, there were at least three apparently similar incidents: At least 33 patients suffered fungal eye infections traced to products made by a compounding pharmacy in Ocala, Fla.; at least a dozen Florida patients were blinded or damaged in an outbreak linked to a compounder in Hollywood, Fla.; and the deaths of nine Alabama patients were attributed to tainted intravenous nutritional supplement provided by a compounder in Birmingham.

"These events have been happening once or twice a year for the last 15 years," Kastango said. "We wouldn't tolerate this if a plane crashed once or twice a year. But in health care, we've grown desensitized to these kinds of problems."

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
6 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
says:
Point of use filters that remove microorganisms are widely available and used to sterilize solutions. They cost only a few dollars. I wonder why they aren't used in high risk applications such as spinal and eye, especially of preservative-free solutions?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nazcap says:
At least this is part of an answer to my biggest question about this outbreak. Although it's just speculation, we should have heard about this aspect of the story a lot earlier.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jaykay3141 says:
This is a horrible tragedy that quite possibly could have been avoided if there had been better oversight of the compounding facility. But unlike drug manufacturers, compounding pharmacies are only subject to regulation at the state level. Does anyone really think it's reasonable to have 50 different sets of rules for these facilities? Oh year, compounding pharmacies aren't in the Constitution so any chance of federal oversight is no way, no how.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LizzieEDRN says:
The contamination could have occurred in the pharmaceutical company from which the drug components came from. Most of them have production lines and unfortunately some have the type of people who don't care about the product. I wouldn't be surprised to find it was the group of packaging employees responsible.
reply
cntrygirl3 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If these pharmacies were properly regulated by the FDA I don't think we would have had this or any of these other outbreaks. State pharmacy boards do not carry the same threat as the FDA. Just know that this is what you get when you deregulate. Exactly how many deaths and sickness are acceptable. If you are planning on voting for Rometoo you better decide because his intentions are to dismantle most of the regulations that protect us from this.
Mathion replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rather than engaging in idyl (and probably inaccurate) speculation as to the true nature of the contamination, it's best to wait on the results of what investigators are doing: Looking for the answers.

It's more important to determine what went wrong and to figure out how to fix it than it is to make wild guesses and speculation that may slander or defame innocent people or companies.

In short, a little patience will yield more knowing, less guessing and less unfounded rumor.
Scroll Left Scroll Right