Court showdown set over morning-after pill

The "morning after" contraceptive. / AP Photo
NEW YORK - A federal judge in Brooklyn is set to hear arguments over whether the federal government is acting constitutionally in its decisions over the access teenage girls should have to morning-after contraceptive pills.
Federal Judge Edward Korman will hear the arguments Tuesday afternoon, a week after the federal government announced that it would block the over-the-counter sale of the anti-pregnancy drug to sexually active girls under age 17.
Korman was highly critical of the government's handling of the issue when he ordered the Food and Drug Administration two years ago to let 17-year-olds obtain the medication.
At the time, he accused the government of letting "political considerations, delays and implausible justifications for decision-making" cloud the approval process.
Sebelius: Decision to keep Plan B age restrictions not political
Morning-after pill block "medically inexplicable," experts say
Women's health advocates decry Plan B decision
Popular in Health
- "Goo" from naked mole rat may protect against cancer
- CDC: HPV vaccine reduced disease rates in teen girls 56%
- Parkinson's disease groups offended by Kanye West lyric
- Natura Pet Products recalls dry foods over salmonella
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Obesity's "disease" risk no secret despite new classification
- Limit food stamps for sodas, 18 mayors ask government
- Japanese "eyeball licking" trend carries blindness risk













This is not to suggest that all born in poverty are slated to be criminals but it is to say that measurable analysis has been done showing that careful consideration by a mother-to-be has a great impact on society.
Once a teenager becomes pregnant, the matter is out of the hands of parents and she becomes emancipated. Though the law may not see it this way, the fact remains.
It's a woman's choice to decide her destiny, not society and its moralistic superstitions extended to her womb.