CBS/AP/ March 19, 2013, 3:44 PM

Pakistani teen shot by Taliban returns to school

LONDON Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani teenager shot in the head by the Taliban, has returned to school for the first time since she was targeted.

A spokesman says the 15-year-old joined other girls at Edgbaston High School for Girls in Birmingham for her first day back at school on Tuesday.

Play Video

Malala - Pakistani girl shot by Taliban - is released from hospital

Malala was airlifted to Britain for treatment after Taliban gunman shot her on Oct. 9 in northwestern Pakistan's Swat Valley. The militant group said it targeted her because she promoted "Western thinking."

She was released in February from the hospital that was treating her for her injuries. Doctors said she was recovering well.

Play Video

Worldwide support shown for "Malala Day"

In a statement, Malala said she was excited "that today I have achieved my dream of going back to school."

"I want all girls in the world to have this basic opportunity," she said.

"I miss my classmates from Pakistan very much but I am looking forward to meeting my teachers and making new friends here in Birmingham."

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
9 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
chwick says:
Whew ....i first thought she was back to school in Pakistan.....but the school is in England.
glad she is doing so much better.
guns are great .....we need more guns here in the states.....this proves that guns are great.....settle all differences with a gun......crazy world
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
VA_Jill says:
All good wishes to Malala. She is an inspiration to people everywhere, but to girls and women especially.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nursedeb49 says:
Please be careful, I doubt that target is off your back by these terrorist men afraid of girls, best to you and I hope you'll make it!! you are an inspiration to many
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
alaskan1st says:
What's your point?????
reply
nursedeb49 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
he doesn't have one, he's been ranting babble on several boards either high or mentally ill
linkicon reporticon emailicon
julianpenrod says:
The lie about the U.S.S. Maine; accusations that Spanish troops stripped American female tourists in Cuba and ogled them; the claim that the U.S. wasn't carrying out spy plane surveillance of the USSR; the Gulf of Tonkin lie; the "Nayirah" fraud that led to the First Gulf War; the claim that Iraq was hiding banned weapons systems.
The lies used by the U.S. to promote the New World Order's corporatist annihilation of freedoms and rights are many. And, each time, too many failed to counter them. And, each time, disaster resulted.
Each lie has to be contradicted and the faults displayed, to keep their intended plan from materializing.
The Malala Yousufzai story is a tissue of lies.
They claim the BBC was broadcasting entries from Malala's diary. How did they even know what she was writing in her diary? Did they put out an audition, asking girls to provide their diary entries?
If it was so dangerous for Malala there, why didn't the BBC evacuate her earlier? Why did they identify her?
Why did it take years for the Taliban to act?
Why did they use so apparently untrustworthy a means and a gunman? Why not a suicide bomber?
The claimed trajectory for the "bullet" that reportedly hit Malala would require the gunman to be standing in mid air, three feet high.
Malala was reportedly hit in the front and was wearing a heavy cloak. But the photograph of the "crime scene" shows a huge square patch of blood on the back of the seat where she sat, behind her!
The type of injury Malala is claimed to have sustained would result in massive blood loss, a black eye, a great deal of bruising near the jaw, a powder burns, but the initial photographs of Malae only showed a darkened eye.
Supporters of the lie know they cannopt rely on qualities of the lie to defend it. As a result, they often utilize non argument methodologies to respond to criticism of their claims. Techniques such as non validated dismissiveness, viciousness, arrogance, contempt, mockery, vulgarity.
reply
MrsHippy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You must be the new Sherlock Holmes after a night of heavy Meth use. There's an AP for that!
Conservalibmiddle replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I do not know what really happened to this girl so I will not pretend to. You make dramatic claims. If you present some evidence to support your claims you will sound less like a tinfoil hatter or a Taliban troll.