Bombings in Iraq kill 65 a decade after U.S. invasion
Iraqi firefighters douse the site of a blast in Baghdad's Shiite district of Sadr City on March 19, 2013. / AFP/Getty Images
Updated 2:38 p.m. Eastern
BAGHDAD Insurgents sent a bloody message on the eve of the 10th anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion, carrying out a wave of bombings across the country Tuesday that killed at least 65 people in the deadliest day in Iraq this year.
The nearly 20 attacks, most of them in and around Baghdad, demonstrated in stark terms how dangerously divided Iraq remains more than a year after American troops withdrew. More than 240 people were reported wounded.
It was Iraq's bloodiest day since Sept. 9, when an onslaught of bombings and shootings killed 92.
Violence has ebbed sharply since the peak of Sunni-Shiite fighting that pushed the country to the brink of civil war in 2006-2007. But insurgents maintain the ability to stage high-profile attacks while sectarian and ethnic rivalries continue to tear at the fabric of national unity.
Iraq invasion: 10 years later
Iraq War poll: 54 percent say U.S. should have stayed out
The bombings came 10 years to the day that Washington announced the start of the invasion on March 19, 2003 — though by that time it was already the following morning in Iraq. A new CBS News poll found 54 percent of Americans say going to war with Iraq was not the right thing to do. Nearly 7 in ten backed the war when it started.
The symbolism of Tuesday's attacks was strong, coming 10 years to the day, Washington time, that former President George W. Bush announced the start of hostilities against Iraq. It was already early March 20, 2003, in Iraq when the airstrikes began.
The military action quickly ousted Saddam Hussein but led to years of bloodshed as Sunni and Shiite militants battled U.S. forces and each other, leaving nearly 4,500 Americans and more than 100,000 Iraqis killed.
A decade later, Iraq's long-term stability and the strength of its democracy remain open questions.
The country is unquestionably freer and more democratic than it was during Saddam's murderous reign. But instead of a solidly pro-U.S. regime, the Iraqis have a Shiite-led government that is arguably closer to Tehran than to Washington and is facing an outpouring of anger by the Sunni minority that was dominant under Saddam and at the heart of the insurgency.
Tuesday's apparently coordinated attacks included car bombs and explosives stuck to the underside of vehicles. They targeted government security forces and mainly Shiite areas, small restaurants, day laborers and bus stops over a span of more than two hours, according to police and hospital officials.
- Iraq war: Was it worth it?
- Tough homecoming for U.S. troops wounded in Iraq
- Poll: Majority says U.S. shouldn't have invaded Iraq
There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the blasts, but they bore hallmarks of al Qaeda in Iraq. The terror group, which favors car bombs and coordinated bombings intended to undermine public confidence in the government, has sought to reassert its presence in recent weeks.
The violence started at around 8 a.m. Tuesday, when a bomb exploded outside a popular restaurant in Baghdad's Mashtal neighborhood, killing four people, according to police and hospital officials. It blew out the eatery's windows and left several cars mangled in the blood-streaked street.
Minutes later, a roadside bomb hit a gathering point for day laborers in the New Baghdad area, killing two of them.
The sprawling Shiite slum district of Sadr City was hit by three explosions that killed 10 people, including three commuters on a minibus.
Hussein Abdul-Khaliq, a government employee who lives in Sadr city, said he heard an explosion and went out to find the minibus on fire.
"We helped take some trapped women and children from outside the burning bus before the arrival of the rescue teams. Our clothes were covered with blood as we tried to rescue the trapped people or to move out the bodies," he said. "Today's attacks are new proof that the politicians and security officials are a huge failure."
The deadliest attack was a 10 a.m. car bombing near the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs in Baghdad's eastern Qahira neighborhood, which killed seven people.
Another car bomb exploded outside a restaurant near one of the main gates to the fortified Green Zone, which houses major government offices and the U.S. and British embassies, killing six people, including two soldiers. Thick black smoke could be seen rising from the area as ambulances raced to the scene.
Just north of the capital, a mortar shell landed near a clinic north of Baghdad in Taji, killing two people, while a roadside bomb hit an army patrol in Tarmiyah, killing a soldier. Another roadside bomb missed a police patrol in Baqouba, hitting a passing car. One passenger was killed.
2003: Iraq War begins
2003: The capture of Saddam Hussein
A car bomb also exploded near a bus stop south of the capital in Iskandiriyah, killing five people. Two policemen were killed when another car bomb hit a security checkpoint near the town.
In the northern city of Mosul, a suicide bomber set off his explosive belt near police Maj. Ghazai al-Jubouri, the head of a local police force in the area, killing him and two bodyguards and wounding four civilians.
Attacks elsewhere in Baghdad killed 23 people in the mainly Shiite neighborhoods of Hussainiyah, Zafarniyah, Kazimiyah, Shula, al-Shurta and Utaifiya.
Underscoring the political tensions, Iraq's Cabinet also decided Tuesday to postpone upcoming elections in two provinces dominated by the country's minority Sunnis for up to six months.
The two provinces affected, Anbar and Ninevah, have been at the center of the nearly three-month-long protests against Iraq's Shiite-led government. Provincial elections were scheduled to go forward elsewhere on April 20.
The decision followed requests from the political blocs in the provinces, government spokesman Ali al-Moussawi said.
Popular on CBSNews.com
-
One year after Afghan massacre, villagers work with U.S. troops One year after U.S. Staff Sgt. Robert Bales was accused of slaughtering 16 Afghan civilians, the villagers in the town where the atrocity took place have joined the U.S. special forces stationed there to assist in the fight against the Taliban.
- 50th Paris Air Show 19 Photos
- Widespread protests in Brazil 23 Photos
- Celebration and devotion in India 14 Photos
- One of FBI's Ten Most Wanted nabbed in Mexico
- Afghan gov't halts talks with U.S. on security pact
- Somali militants wage deadly attack on U.N. office
- Rare twin birth for gorilla in Dutch zoo Play Video
- Brazil protesters flood Sao Paulo streets for 2nd night
It's much easier to start a war than to end one, anyone with ANY sense of intelligence or history knows that. Because it leaves a vacuum just waiting to be filled.
You think Iran wouldn't have tried again to step in?
THAT'S why you don't go to war for foolish reasons (never mind the fact that Saddam had NOTHING to do with 9-11 and more of our people were killed in Iraq than on 9-11.
You're such short-sighted, reactionary, ignorant FOOLS to say such nonsense!
"I guess you were sleeping when the brutal terrorist Saddam Hussein..."
FREDRICKFGE replies:
"I guess you were sleeping when the brutal terrorist Saddam Hussein..."
SNOOPKK replies:
"I guess you were sleeping when the brutal terrorist Saddam Hussein..."
Too funny.....all you conservatrolls have the same, exact, RWNJ propaganda from the usual far-right fringe sites! LOL!
-----------
LOL! Do you RWNJs still 'think' that repeating that propaganda day in and day out, will make the Iraqi WAR HOAX really 'true'?
Watch "Hubris": New Documentary Reexamines the Iraq War "Hoax"
An MSNBC film, based on Michael Isikoff and David Corn's book, finds new evidence that Bush scammed the nation into war.
You would learn the TRUTH of you watched it, but you're too afraid of the TRUTH like all neocons today!
You people are a waste of time!
You have the NERVE to compare that to the removal of Qaddafi and Mubarack? First of all, those were NOT orchestrated by Obama , they were uprisings in those countries that would have happened with our without any outside intervention! Second, no American troops were sent in to be killed!
Sorry SteveL47, but you're both wrong and an IDIOT!!!
An MSNBC film, hosted by Rachel Maddow and based on Michael Isikoff and David Corn's book, finds new evidence that Bush scammed the nation into war.
A decade ago, on March 19, 2003, President George W. Bush launched the invasion of Iraq that would lead to a nine-year war resulting in 4,486 dead American troops, 32,226 service members wounded, and over 100,000 dead Iraqi civilians. The tab for the war topped $3 trillion. Bush did succeed in removing Saddam Hussein, but it turned out there were no weapons of mass destruction and no significant operational ties between Saddam's regime and Al Qaeda. That is, the two main assertions used by Bush and his crew to justify the war were not true. Three years after the war began, Michael Isikoff, then an investigative reporter for Newsweek (he's since moved to NBC News), and I published Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War, a behind-the-scenes account of how Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and their lieutenants deployed false claims, iffy intelligence, and unsupported hyperbole to win popular backing for the invasion.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/02/hubris-rachel-maddow-documentary-iraq-war-david-corn
-------------
This documentary will be re-aired this Friday, March 22, at 9 PM EDT.
It's a must see, and even neocons can plainly see the TRUTH for once!
All these treasonous republicans like nixon, reagan, bush and cheney should have been imprisoned for their treasonous escapades!
There were no weapons of mass destruction and no significant operational ties between Saddam's regime and Al Qaeda.
It was the worst military blunder in U.S. history, bar none, and the only winner has been Iran!