By

Phil Hirschkorn /

CBS News/ March 16, 2013, 4:59 PM

Dispute over hunger strikes at Guantanamo

From left to right: Hussain Almerfedi, Said Hatim, Fayiz Al-Kandari and Yasin Ismail. They are detainees at Guantanamo who are on a hunger strike, defense attorneys said.

From left to right: Hussain Almerfedi, Said Hatim, Fayiz Al-Kandari and Yasin Ismail. They are detainees at Guantanamo who are on a hunger strike, defense attorneys said. / CBS

NEW YORK Attorneys for detainees long-held without charges at the U.S military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, assert that a general hunger strike involving many of the 166 detainees who remain incarcerated there has entered its second month.

But the U.S. military strongly denies that claim, calling it "a fabrication," and instead says only 14 detainees are actively engaged in hunger strikes detrimental to their health.

In a letter of concern sent to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on Thursday, a group of 51 detainee attorneys wrote, "at least two dozen men have lost consciousness due to low blood glucose levels." The Pentagon said it was aware of the letter but declined to discuss it.

CBS News has interviewed five attorneys who have heard directly from self-described hunger-striking detainees in the past week either in person or in telephone calls.

David Remes, a Washington-based attorney, visited six detainees at Guantanamo last week who told him they were refusing meals. All reside in Camp Six, the base's largest and least restrictive area, which houses about 130 detainees who share communal space and whose cell doors are unlocked during the day.

According to Remes, as of March 8, when he left Guantanamo, six detainees he represents had refused food for 36 days, skipping 102 meals, and each man said he had lost at least 30 pounds.

"It was quite noticeable," Remes said. "The men I saw were weak, tired, chilled, and had lost a substantial amount of weight."

One of those detainees, Yasin Qassem Muhammad Ismail, from Yemen, who followed up with a phone call to Remes on Wednesday, told the attorney that he now weighed 109 pounds, down from 150.

Moreover, these detainees told Remes during his visit that all but a few inhabitants of Camp Six who were too old or infirm have been refusing food since early February.

However, two Defense Department spokesmen, Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale at the Pentagon and Capt. Robert Durand at the Guantanamo base, denied there is a widespread hunger strike at the military prison.

"That there is any concrete, mass hunger strike -- that is an utter fabrication," Breasseale said. "Some who claim to be hunger striking are in fact eating handfuls of trail mix, nuts, and other food. They are taking in plenty of calories."

The Defense Department spokesmen said only nine detainees had recently skipped enough meals to qualify for hunger-strike monitoring under a "very specific medical determination" covering weight loss and body mass and modeled after U.S. Bureau of Prisons protocols.

The Defense Department spokesmen said one of those hunger strikers, plus five other detainees who have conducted hunger strikes on and off for years, are currently being subjected to enteral feeding, or the forcing of liquid nutrients through a tube down their nose while strapped to a chair.

"We will not allow a detainee to harm himself," Breasseale said.

Attorney Remes said none of the six clients he saw, nor eight other detainees he represents, are being force-fed by the military. "They intervene only when the detainee is really, clearly, not too far away from death," he said.

Air Force Lt. Col Barry Wingard, appointed defense counsel for detainee Fayiz Mohammad Ahmad Jamal al-Kandari, from Kuwait, said it appeared Al-Kandari had lost 25 pounds when he saw him in person last week.

"He looks bad. He's a step away from being tubed," Wingard said, referring to the force feedings. Al-Kandari, who resides in Camp Six, has never been charged with a crime despite being held for 11 years. The emir of Kuwait has asked for his return.

"Any hope of getting any kind of justice is vanishing before his eyes," Wingard said.

Two self-described hunger strikers from Yemen represented by Remes -- Hussain Salem Muhammed Almerfedi and Said Muhammad Salih Hatim -- are on a 2010 government list of 56 detainees approved for transfer from Guantanamo.

Remes saw Almerfedi last week but not Hatim. "I was told he was too weak to see me," Remes said.

Remes said their imprisonment for 11 years without charges was an underlying cause of the hunger strikes. "It adds insult to injury that they have been approved for transfer. The reality is no one is leaving; everyone is in indefinite detention."

Attorneys say detainee tensions escalated in the past two months following two events at Guantanamo -- a non-lethal recreation yard shooting and searches of the detainee cells.

On Jan. 2, a Guantanamo guard fired a rubber crowd-dispersal round from a tower into a group of detainees in the fenced-in recreation area of Camp Six.

Defense Department spokesman Breasseale said the single round consisted of 18 blueberry-sized rubber balls and one hit a detainee, but he was not injured. Breasseale said the disturbance began when two detainees tried to climb a fence, and then others began throwing rocks at a guard tower.

One of Remes' clients, Uthman Abd Rahim Muhammad Uthman, from Yemen, told Remes he had been in the yard at the time and witnessed the incident. Uthman told Remes one detainee threw a rock in response to the rubber-bullet firing, not the other way around.

In early February, detainee attorneys say Guantanamo guards renewed searches of detainee cells and confiscated personal items such as photographs, letters, legal papers, exercise mats, blankets, towels, and tooth brushes. The tipping point, the attorneys say, occurred when the guards began searching detainee Korans, something guards had not done since 2006.

Pardiss Kebriaei, an attorney with the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights, spoke on the phone last week to one detainee who said he is participating in a hunger strike, Ghaleb Nassar Al-Bihani, from Yemen.

"He said it was triggered by searches of the men's Korans, which they perceive as desecration," Kebriaei said. "He said there's been a hunger strike with almost all the men since early February."

Al-Bihani said, as of last week, he had refused all food except water, tea, and coffee for 30 days and had lost 23 pounds, according to Kebriaei. She said Al-Bihani is a diabetic, and she is worried about permanent damage to his body's organs.

"It's definitely a response to extreme frustration, desperation of men who've been detained more than 11 years and don't see an end in sight," Kebriaei said. "It makes the situation seem hopeless to them."

Anne Richardson, a California attorney who represents an Afghan detainee called Obaydullah, said he told her over the phone last week that he had lost 15 pounds after refusing food over the harsh new rules.

"It's a completely unnecessary change, and the men have no way to protest other than to go on a hunger strike," Richardson said.

Defense Department spokesman Durand, at Guantanamo, described the accusations that detainee conditions had deteriorated as "patently false" and that Korans were being mishandled as "simply untrue."

"There has been no change to our cell block search standard operating procedures. We routinely conduct searches for contraband that could be used to harm guards, medical personnel, translators, instructors, attorneys, or detainees," Durand said. "Guards are to avoid touching any detainee's Koran at any time. The Koran is treated with the utmost respect."

Durand said in comparison to the 14 detainees the military considers hunger strikers now, there were once more than 100 at one point in 2006.

He said, "At no time is a detainee deprived of the basic elements of humane treatment: food, water, religious articles, hygiene items, medical treatment, or physical recreation opportunities."

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
30 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ammo17 says:
see even the terrorists are helping us with the sequester.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
robert1129 says:
The military has lied so much about Gitmo that no one really believes them any more.

Either try these detainees and punsih them or release them. Over 11 years detention without resolvement is way too long.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ex-NAVY says:
Good the money we save on food will help off set the cut in the military budget.

I think we shud feed them nothing but pork, they would not know the taste would they?
reply
Louis_Chez replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree! Supply them with all of the pork they can eat and if they refuse to eat it, screw em! Let them starve.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
knsn_for_cmn_sense says:
Well. Im having a bit of trouble feelign sorry for these a holes.

Let em starve to death and be done with it.
reply
Louis_Chez replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree, KNSN. Only a low life piece of crap would support these criminals.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
josephp5 says:
When is the US going to put these men on trial? It's been over ten years now!

I thought the US has something in its Constitution that said that everyone charged with a crime deserves a trial (and it does say everyone, not just citizens). The US claims these men are terrorists, and maybe that's true, but the US also said that about Maher Arar, who was completely innocent!

I suspect that the US doesn't really have the evidence that these men are terrorists. It could very well be that the government simply is embarrassed that they have held these men possibly in error for so long, and just doesn't want to admit that they have made a terrible mistake! After all, the U.S. imprisoned Mahr Arar and sent him to Syria to be tortured, even though the U.S. now admits he was innocent.

If they're really terrorists, then lets put them on trial and convict them. Otherwise let them go. This is the ideal on which the United States was founded. Our system of Justice is too sacred to destroy it by holding people for decades without charges.
reply
andthetruthis replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What I actually believe is - If they were brought to trial,the American people would have the truth revealed to them.

The men have done nothing. So,they can never bring them out.
People would be upset that they agreed to mistreat these men.
Snookered.

They are guilty because the Government said so.The Bush/Cheney Government.
Louis_Chez replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The constitution does not apply to enemy combatants captured on the battle field and imprisoned outside of our borders.

That is the purpose of Gitmo to begin with.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
philthefarmer says:
guess these terrorist hung on saying certainly bush won't be re-elected then 4 yrs now obama are guy is elected great were gettin out now instead 4 more yrs then obama gets re-elected and they know it'll be 4 more years they should be tried and convicted or freed the guilty ones integrated into are federal prison structure hell try them with there own shria code so we can cut hands and heads off on hbo to pay 4 there cost of trial and upkeep those that are not guilty ought to go home with a stipend like we give federal prisoners at so much so year
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BludApfel says:
Look at them - why should we give a rat's ass if any one of them end up dying?

It'll be a better day for all of us when these monsters are exterminated.
reply
andthetruthis replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They are "monsters",and "animals",why?
Cause,you say so?
In this country we have "preponderance of evidence".
You don't want to be called racist,so,how have you judged these men guilty, WITHOUT A TRIAL!!??
Louis_Chez replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ANDTHETRUTH

They are not in "this" country.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
1Citizen says:
Regardless of who these men are, what they've done or want to do, I believe that it's a human right not to be lock-up in prison without a trial and conviction. Only the most despicable governments in history have undertaken this practice and it should not be tolerated, especially by the democratically elected United States government. The Guantanamo situation continues to be a national disgrace, and an affront to those who live by laws.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dkn1234 says:
Let them die...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
quincytodd says:
Those filthy creeps who run Gitmo will say anything just to make themselves look good! I say turn the boys loose and just ignore these uneducated lemmings here who constantly rant against them! Probably none of these ignoramuses here ever got past grade school.
reply
See all 30 Comments