AP/ March 7, 2013, 4:38 AM

North Korea vows nuclear strike against U.S.

Updated 11:40 a.m. ET

SEOUL, South Korea North Korea on Thursday vowed to launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the United States, amplifying its threatening rhetoric hours ahead of a scheduled vote by U.N. diplomats on whether to level new sanctions against Pyongyang for its recent nuclear test.

An unidentified spokesman for Pyongyang's Foreign Ministry said the North will exercise its right for "a preemptive nuclear attack to destroy the strongholds of the aggressors" because Washington is pushing to start a nuclear war against the North.

Although North Korea boasts of nuclear bombs and preemptive strikes, it is not thought to have mastered the ability to produce a warhead small enough to put on a missile capable of reaching the U.S. It is believed to have enough nuclear fuel, however, for several crude nuclear devices.

Such inflammatory rhetoric is common from North Korea, and especially so in recent days. North Korea is angry over the possible sanctions and over upcoming U.S.-South Korean military drills. At a mass rally in Pyongyang on Thursday, tens of thousands of North Koreans protested the U.S.-South Korean war drills and sanctions.

All 15 of the U.N. Security Council's members voted to impose a fourth round of sanctions against Pyongyang in a fresh attempt to rein in its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

Play Video

How long will China back a defiant N. Korea?

Play Video

Panetta: North Korean nuclear test "a serious threat" to U.S.

The resolution was drafted by the United States and China, North Korea's closest ally.

The statement by the North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman was carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency.

It accused the U.S. of leading efforts to slap sanctions on North Korea. The statement said the new sanctions would only advance the timing for North Korea to fulfill previous vows to take "powerful second and third countermeasures" against its enemies. It hasn't elaborated on those measures.

The statement said North Korea "strongly warns the U.N. Security Council not to make another big blunder like the one in the past when it earned the inveterate grudge of the Korean nation by acting as a war servant for the U.S. in 1950."

North Korea demanded the U.N. Security Council immediately dismantle the American-led U.N. Command that's based in Seoul and move to end the state of war that exists on the Korean Peninsula, which continues six decades after fighting stopped because an armistice, not a peace treaty, ended the war.

In anticipation of the resolution's adoption, North Korea earlier in the week threatened to cancel the 1953 cease-fire that ended the Korean War.

North Korean threats have become more common as tensions have escalated following a rocket launch by Pyongyang in December and its third nuclear test on Feb. 12. Both acts defied three Security Council resolutions that bar North Korea from testing or using nuclear or ballistic missile technology and from importing or exporting material for these programs.

U.S. U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said the resolution as proposed would impose some of the strongest sanctions ever ordered by the United Nations.

The final version of the draft resolution, released Wednesday, identified three individuals, one corporation and one organization that would be added to the U.N. sanctions list if the measure is approved.

The targets include top officials at a company that is the country's primary arms dealer and main exporter of ballistic missile-related equipment, and a national organization responsible for research and development of missiles and probably nuclear weapons.

The success of a new round of sanctions could depend on enforcement by China, where most of the companies and banks that North Korea is believed to work with are based.

The United States and other nations worry that North Korea's third nuclear test pushed it closer to its goal of gaining nuclear missiles that can reach the U.S. The international community has condemned the regime's nuclear and missile efforts as threats to regional security and a drain on the resources that could go to North Korea's largely destitute people.

The draft resolution condemns the latest nuclear test "in the strongest terms" for violating and flagrantly disregarding council resolutions, bans further ballistic missile launches, nuclear tests "or any other provocation," and demands that North Korea return to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. It also condemns all of North Korea's ongoing nuclear activities, including its uranium enrichment.

But the proposed resolution stresses the council's commitment "to a peaceful, diplomatic and political solution" and urged a resumption of six-party talks with the aim of denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula "in a peaceful manner."

The proposed resolution would make it significantly harder for North Korea to move around the funds it needs to carry out its illicit programs and strengthen existing sanctions and the inspection of suspect cargo bound to and from the country. It would also ban countries from exporting specific luxury goods to the North, including yachts, luxury automobiles, racing cars, and jewelry with semi-precious and precious stones and precious metals.

According to the draft, all countries would now be required to freeze financial transactions or services that could contribute to North Korea's nuclear or missile programs.

To get around financial sanctions, North Koreans have been carrying around large suitcases filled with cash to move illicit funds. The draft resolution expresses concern that these bulk cash transfers may be used to evade sanctions. It clarifies that the freeze on financial transactions and services that could violate sanctions applies to all cash transfers as well as the cash couriers.

The proposed resolution also bans all countries from providing public financial support for trade deals, such as granting export credits, guarantees or insurance, if the assistance could contribute to the North's nuclear or missile programs.

It includes what a senior diplomat called unprecedented new travel sanctions that would require countries to expel agents working for sanctioned North Korean companies.

The draft also requires states to inspect suspect cargo on their territory and prevent any vessel that refuses an inspection from entering their ports. And a new aviation measure calls on states to deny aircraft permission to take off, land or fly over their territory if illicit cargo is suspected to be aboard.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
156 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
damnedreligion says:
Have our world leaders been reduced to attacking first, because their ability to resolve issues peacefully, is insufficient and failing?

If so, then replace such failing leaders with ones who have brains.
reply
mikecummings378 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bad idea for North Korea .... we have plenty Nuclear Weapons to do a good job. View Never Before Seen Pictures of the Pantex Nuclear Weapons Facility in Amarillo Texas

http://www.IvanRolig
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sandiegopete says:
Does the USA have an iron dome like the Israelis?
reply
knsn_for_cmn_sense replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No. We had to buy theirs first.
mikecummings378 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Our Iron Dome is made up of thousands of Nuclear Weapons standing ready by Air, Land and Sea .... the triad.

View pictures here http://www.IvanRolig.com
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lawyers-Guns-n-Money-5 says:
A relationship based on ideology -- one of the most commonly stated reasons for China and North Korea's friendship -- is dangerous, and although both countries are socialist, their differences are much larger than those between China and the west.

North Korea is more of a liability than a buffer to China.

North Korea will not reform; if Kim Jong Un tries to, he could be overthrown. Why should China maintain relations with a regime and a country that will face failure sooner or later?

The media has reported, on many occasions, the row between China and Japan over a a few rocks in the sea. What they haven't reported is the Chinese public's demonstrations and open displays of anger over North Korea's nuclear test last month.

China knows it's about time to cut bait.

North Korea is pulling away from Beijing -- and Kim might even use his nuclear weapons to blackmail China.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fatmanz says:
what is this world coming to we need to get obama out of there we are going down so damn fast it is making all of our heads spin
reply
Lawyers-Guns-n-Money-5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
'Cause there's a fat maaaaaaan
In the bathtuuuuuub
With the bluuuuues

Get over yourself. This has been an ongoing process since they reneged on their "Non-Nuclear Korean Peninsula" pledge.

China wasn't exactly helping the situation but even they are growing weary and a little more than concerned that they themselves may ultimately have to be the ones to spank lil' Kim's hiney.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JSmith1984 says:
"An unidentified spokesman for Pyongyang's Foreign Ministry said the North will exercise its right for "a preemptive nuclear attack to destroy the strongholds of the aggressors" because Washington is pushing to start a nuclear war against the North. "

Ok, so there is no source. Great journalism. I'm glad I can trust anything in this propaganda. Why do we want to bomb N.Korea so badly? It's not our freaking business, and they're not going to attack us.
reply
FOX_PARROTS_LIE replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"Why do we want to bomb N.Korea so badly?"



We don't, and obviously you couldn't see that this propaganda was coming from North Korea, and a bunch of paranoid schizophreniacs.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DEBUNT says:
It seems that the capability of North Korea to launch an intercontinental ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead is still far off in the future. However, there seems to be no concern that a submarine launched missile could be launched, if the North Koreans have such submarines. They do have some diesel-powered powered submarines, and very few nuclear submarines in their arsenal. The usual response to the question is that the diesel-powered submarines are relatively quite and must surface from time to time to refuel and take on supplies for long range deployment. The nuclear submarines are loud and detectable and my be without nuclear missiles. Sounds threatening from North Korea.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Think4times says:
I Brame Arec Bawrin too!
reply
Think4times replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Team America: World Police
linkicon reporticon emailicon
raymailhot says:
More socialist rhetoric!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jaylew714 says:
Gosh.....I am sure the United States is now unable to sleep....wrought with fear and utterly shaking in its boots because North Korea is going to toss one of it's raggedy patchwork 1968 technology nuclear missiles our way.

We may not quite be what we once were militarily.....but one thing is as sure as I am typing this.....a preemptive strike of any kind by North Korea will be the last thing that country does preemptively....or does in any way early...concomitantly or late.

North Korea is one of the last "joke" countries on earth...they are nothing but a Saturday Night Live skit that should have been cancelled 2 decades ago... Sad really that North Korean citizens are nothing but little puppets with heartbeats. And given the way and fashion that the South Korean nation and it's lovely people are so close and vulnerable....I am thinking that our response should be something from our Neutron weapon cache....because of course gifting the infrastructure and physical remains of North Korea to South Korea...should be the first order of business. I would love to see that giant stadium in North Korea filled with girl K-Pop groups dancing and singing their lovely lungs out and their lovely legs and butts off. Yep....lets warm up North Korea...gangnam style.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FOX_PARROTS_LIE says:
Inflammatory rhetoric from North Korea is one thing, but an unprovoked and preemptive military strike by them would essentially be committing suicide.
reply
FOX_PARROTS_LIE replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As usual ranger, you're just fooling yourself with your hatred!
See all 156 Comments