CBS/AP/ March 1, 2013, 3:19 PM

China executes 4 foreigners, televises death march

In this photo released by China's Xinhua News Agency, Myanmar drug lord Naw Kham, center, and three of his accomplices, unseen, are taken to the execution chambers where they received lethal injections in Kunming, capital of southwest China's Yunnan Province, Friday, March 1, 2013.

In this photo released by China's Xinhua News Agency, Myanmar drug lord Naw Kham, center, and three of his accomplices, unseen, are taken to the execution chambers where they received lethal injections in Kunming, capital of southwest China's Yunnan Province, Friday, March 1, 2013. / AP Photo/Xinhua, Wang Shen

BEIJING China executed four foreigners on Friday for killing 13 Chinese sailors in an attack on the Mekong River, following a live nationwide broadcast showing them being led to their deaths that harkened back to the mass public execution rallies of past years.

The attack on the sailors on the Mekong highlighted drug smuggling and extortion rackets along the vital waterway and led to a major expansion of Chinese police powers in the region.

Accused ringleader Naw Kham and accomplices Hsang Kham, Yi Lai, and Zha Xiha were found guilty of the killings. The four are of Myanmar, Thai, Laotian, and unknown nationality.

In the unusual live broadcast, state-run CCTV showed the four being led in shackles and handcuffs from their cells at a jail in southwestern Yunnan province's capital of Kunming prior to their execution by lethal injection. Their deaths were announced two hours later by the Yunnan provincial police department.

China has mostly abandoned the once-common practice of parading condemned criminals before crowds in stadiums and through city streets on the way to execution grounds on the edge of cities.

The broadcast was a response to widespread Chinese outrage over the killings, as well as an attempt to emphasize the heinousness of the crime and the efficiency of China's police and courts in doling out justice, said Prof. Yu Guoming of Renmin University's School of Mass Media.

"The brutality of Naw Kham in the killing really got ordinary Chinese people riled up. It's no wonder that it has attracted such huge attention from the public," Yu said.

The gang was accused of ambushing two flat-bottomed Chinese cargo ships on the upper reaches of the Mekong River on Oct. 5, 2011, in Myanmar waters infested with gangs that make their living from protection rackets and the production and smuggling of heroin, methamphetamine and other drugs. The Mekong flows south from Yunnan through the infamous "Golden Triangle" region, where the borders of Myanmar, Laos and Thailand meet, and provides a vital trade and transportation route between southwestern China and Southeast Asia.

The ships were recovered downriver later that day by Thai police following a gun battle with gang members, and the bodies of the 13 victims, some bound by the hands before being stabbed and shot, were fished from the river over the following days. Methamphetamine was found on the boats, leading to speculation they had been hijacked as part of a drug smuggling plot.

However, gang members later testified the killings were in retaliation for the ships refusing to pay protection money and allowing themselves to be used by Thai and Laotian soldiers in attacks on warlord bases. They said the drugs were placed on board to make it look like there had been a struggle between smugglers.

China's Public Security Ministry made the case a top priority, forming a 200-officer special investigation group and working with Thai, Lao, and Myanmar authorities to gather evidence and track down the perpetrators. Naw Kham was arrested in Laos last April and turned over to China the following month along with the other defendants. Because the killings took place on board Chinese-flagged vessels, Beijing, whose massive economy and powerful military give it considerable sway over its smaller southern neighbors, ruled the trials should take place in China.

"Some analysts had even said the hunt for Naw Kham could be as difficult as the hunt for bin Laden," the Global Times reported this week

The four were sentenced to death in November in a two-day trial, and the judgment was upheld by China's Supreme People's Court in Beijing following an automatic appeal in accordance with Chinese law.

In their testimony, the four said they had conspired with renegade Thai soldiers, nine of whom were arrested in October 2011 in Thailand and charged with taking part in the killings. They have yet to be tried or extradited, and remain in Thai army custody.

Months after the killings, China established a multinational river patrol headquartered in Yunnan which Beijing says has been effective in clamping down on such incidents.

"The case set a precedent that China would vigorously pursue criminals who commit crimes against its nationals. That's led to an expansion of Chinese police powers into the neighboring region and a big boost in Chinese influence," said Jin Canrong, associate dean of Renmin University's School of International Studies in Beijing.

China has devoted increasing attention to the safety of its nationals abroad as the Chinese economy continues to expand overseas. In recent years, Beijing has used navy ships and air force planes to help evacuate Chinese workers from fighting in Libya, and its diplomats have worked to free kidnapped workers and resolve local disputes across Africa and parts of Asia.

According to the Guardian, human rights groups say China executes about 8,000 people per year but China does not disclose the exact number.

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
24 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Harry1899 says:
This is exactly how America and the rest of the world should have handled the Somali pirates
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
yada-yada says:
I've traveled through south west china and in particular the cities in china just north of burma and laos. These towns have no signs of industry yet you see men in their 20s driving blacked out bmws. Very scary places. Mengla and Mengshi (jinghong and rialli, etc) were two that stick out in my mind. The signs of drug money are obvious in the name brands of stores there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SeeaBSer says:
Netjunkie and others...not sure you are talking about the US, but I assume you are...please list the names of the wrongly-convicted dead in the US. I would be (seriously), highly interested to know. From what I have researched, this is one of the biggest red herrings going. Have their been people languishing in prisons for years, decades even, wrongly convicted? Absolutely, and that may never be rectified, but I would love to see a list of truly innocent, wrongly-accused citizens put to death by the US Fed or State governments. As I stated above. If you can pull out a list of documented names etc you will have converted me to end the practice. Otherwise, at a base minimum, the death penalty provides at least a protection to the guards in the prisons...
reply
3march replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If you're looking for examples of errors and misconduct regarding the death penalty, you haven't looked very hard. Try the InnocenceProject.org for starters.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
amicuscuria says:
RE: Death Penalty
In the U.S., capital punishment trials typically garner 'super' due process in a nod to avoid unjust convictions. Yet innocent defendants still end up on death row. The percentage of innocent convicted felons in non-capital cases is far greater. Perhaps Chris Dorner (the recently deceased ex-LAPD cop) is an example of what the consequences can be for such injustice. So I ask the person defending the death penalty as de minimus prone to error: How many Chris Dorners do you feel are acceptable?--after all, MOST cops don't become homicidal maniacs--even the ones who have been egregiously wronged. Perhaps you're looking through the wrong end of the telescope? -amicuscuria.com/wordpress-
reply
SeeaBSer replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I keep seeing this rolling amount of innocent people having been put to death in America...3, 5, 10-15...really? Really? Please name these people. Since they were innocent, their deaths must be big news and their names exremely public as well. Please name them and provide links to their story, so I can read about it. If you can convince me that we really do have an epidemic, an out-of-control judiciary which kills innocents, you will convince me that we need to end it.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rgrowley says:
the 4th person, Zha Xiha, is from China but the Chinese government is cowardly to not admit it. What other country but China spells their words like a bunch of First Grade Elementary students. The abreviated Communist Chinese language is silly.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GoodPartyMember says:
YAAAYYY!

Let's hear it for a police force with unlimited powers, and no legislated limits! It's what we all want! We want a three strikes law more than we want the Constitutional protection against double jeopardy.

We want our press under control and not reporting all willy nilly on things like war...and DEFINITELY not freely publishing government leaks.

We want excessive bails and NO speedy trials. We want the Patriot Act and Indefinite Detention.. not that Constitutional crap about due process and judicial overview of police actions.

We are Americans, after all... we despise the whole idea of limiting government by legislation. we want a powerful unfettered government, like China's.

We want it, and by God, we're gonna keep voting for it until we finallt get it!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KingGalactus says:
You can't just say that since mistakes have been made on murder trials as to who was guilty that the death penalty shouldn't exist at all. Some people didn't really steal socks from Walmart either, should you just be able to walk out of Walmart and never get a ticket, because one time somebody really didn't mean to put them in their pocket and forgot? You need to present REAL percentages % REAL numbers and show what the error is. If there is a 50% wrong conviction rate, then we have a problem, 30% still a problem, if we get down to 3% 2% 1% then the death penalty should be no problem. You can't use such a hasty generalization to justify your point; it is incredibly weak.
reply
rzarc2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Over 1000 people have been executed in the US since 1976. So what you are saying is that it is OK to state sanction the murder of 10, 20, or 30 innocent people. Not a chance I would take with another persons life unless I had a 1000 eye witnesses and confirming video and pictures and a confession.

I would support the death penalty if it was FOOLPROOF and not (less importantly) barbaric in the 21st Century. It is neither foolproof and IS barbaric and probably (big debate on this one) less cost effective then locking someone up for life with no chance of parole. Plus you make a person waste their lifetime knowing they will never get to enjoy freedom again while rotting in prison. That is probably worse then being executed and something I hope you or I will never have to contemplate about ourselves or a family member.
3march replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A little mind exercise: imagine a close friend, a relative, or even yourself wrongly convicted by a zealous prosecutor and an angry jury eager to exact retribution for a heinous crime facing execution. Still not a problem?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dickhead79 says:
china rocks we need this justics in america
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
norcal441 says:
Seeing Is Believing

I was a common practice in many countries throughout history to not only parade the soon to die criminals in front of the public but also the dead victims so the public can understand the losses all around involved in criminal behavior.

People believe what they see.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ksmit2 says:
I could not necessarily agree with the Chinese on everything, I would wholeheartedly agree with them on this situation. The law is the law. You break the law, you pay. The Chinese demonstrate the intelligence and commitment to prosecute suspects rather than prosecute the laws that were intended to protect the public. You will not find people with "42 arrests and 18 convictions"... walking the streets in that country.
reply
See all 24 Comments