N. Korea upgrading missile site, research group says

North Korean army officers and soldiers attend a rally in Pyongyang, North Korea, Feb. 14, 2013, in celebration of the country's recent nuclear test. The U.N. Security Council condemned North Korea's decision to conduct a third underground nuclear test earlier in the week in defiance of resolutions banning nuclear and missile activity. / AP

WASHINGTON North Korea is upgrading one of its two major missile launch sites, apparently to handle much bigger rockets, and some design features suggest it is getting help from Iran, a U.S. research institute said Thursday.

A successful satellite launch in December, and a nuclear test on Tuesday, both in defiance of U.N. Security Council resolutions, have intensified concern that North Korea is moving toward its goal of building a bomb small enough to be fitted on an intercontinental missile.

An analysis written for 38 North, the website of the U.S.-Korea Institute at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, indicates that North Korea has made significant progress since October in constructing a new launchpad and other facilities at Tonghae, on the country's northeast coast. The assessment is based on commercial satellite photos, the latest taken in January.

Play Video

Panetta: North Korean nuclear test "a serious threat" to U.S.

It says design features, including a flame trench covering that protects large rockets from the hot exhaust gases they emit on takeoff, is similar to one at a launch complex in Semnan, Iran, and hasn't been used by the North before.

The analysis also identifies activity at an older launchpad at Tonghae, last used for a long-range rocket in 2009, but says it's unclear if that indicates preparations for another launch there.

The North's most recent long-range launches -- a failed attempt to put a satellite into space atop an Unha-2 rocket in April, then a successful effort in December -- were conducted at a newer site, Sohae, on the west coast.

38 North estimates that construction at Tonghae's new launch pad could be completed by 2016. It says tanks installed last fall into support buildings that would be used to store fuel propellant prior to a launch would be big enough for rockets three or four times larger than the Unha.

• Kerry: Confronting N. Korea sends message to Iran
• North Korea nuclear test prompts neighbors to mobilize militaries, scientists
• U.N. condemns "clear threat" from North Korea after nuclear test

Assessing the intentions of North Korea's secretive regime and the nation's technical capabilities is notoriously difficult. Analysts doubt the North has yet mastered how to miniaturize a nuclear device to mount on a long-range missile and attain its goal of being able to directly threaten the United States.

"This analysis is just another piece of the puzzle indicating North Korea's intention to field increasingly capable long-range missiles able to carry nuclear warheads," said Joel Wit, a former State Department official and editor of 38 North.

He said it hinted at "the cozy relationship between the North and Iran as both move forward with developing weapons of mass destruction."

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday drew a direct connection between North Korea and Iran, saying both cases demonstrated the need for international resolve against proliferation threats. He did not touch on whether they could be cooperating on missile and nuclear development.

[Jackk27]

BludApfel replies: China has nothing to lose by allowing NK to be belligerent. In face Beijing must secretly be snickering at our inability to do anything about what NK does since China not only owns our government now but it allows China to see how we react.
______________________

It's not that we are unable to do anything about North Korea. If we wanted to, the U.S. could completely destroy NK's military machine in short order.

It's more of a political issue than a question of our ability to do something about them.

[iamproteus]

If No. Korea can afford to build and maintain such an enormous army and all the other elements of their defense strategy, why do so many nations (notably the U.S.)continue to send the various forms of aid that they do? Is it because we hate to see the people out in their rice patties starving and shivering in the cold? If so, it's money wasted because the ordinary people don't see a dime of it! Every dime's worth of aid the DPRK gets from the rest of the world is another dime's worth of investment in their paranoid defense stance and the luxurious maintenance of their "Dear Leader". Why should we continue to feed a dog that constantly threatens to bite us?