CBS/AP/ February 5, 2013, 3:23 PM

British lawmakers vote in favor of gay marriage bill championed by PM David Cameron

In this Dec. 19, 2005 file photo, Henry Edmont Cane, left, and partner Christopher Patrick Flanaghan kiss outisde Belfast, City Hall, Belfast, Northern Ireland. The couple became the first male couple to win legal recognition for their partnership under a British civil partnership law. Prime Minister David Cameron and senior British officials threw their weight behind gay marriage Feb. 5, 2013, reiterating their support of a proposed bill hours ahead of a key Parliament vote on the divisive topic.

In this Dec. 19, 2005 file photo, Henry Edmont Cane, left, and partner Christopher Patrick Flanaghan kiss outisde Belfast, City Hall, Belfast, Northern Ireland. The couple became the first male couple to win legal recognition for their partnership under a British civil partnership law. Prime Minister David Cameron and senior British officials threw their weight behind gay marriage Feb. 5, 2013, reiterating their support of a proposed bill hours ahead of a key Parliament vote on the divisive topic. / File,AP Photo/Peter Morrison

LONDON British lawmakers on Tuesday voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill to legalize same-sex marriage championed by Prime Minister David Cameron, despite strong opposition from within his Conservative Party.

In a first House of Commons vote, lawmakers voted 400 to 175 in support of the legislation. There was majority support from the left-leaning Labour Party and Liberal Democrats party, but around half of the Conservative lawmakers rejected the proposals or abstained.

The bill will have to go through more detailed parliamentary debates and a vote in the House of Lords, where a vote in favor is likely given the strong support Tuesday. If it becomes law, the proposed bill would enable same-sex couples to get married in both civil and religious ceremonies, provided that the religious institution consents.

The bill would also allow couples who had previously entered into civil partnerships to convert their relationship into a marriage.

Earlier, Cameron - who did not attend a Parliament debate ahead of the vote - said passing the bill is "an important step forward" for Britain.

"I am a strong believer in marriage. It helps people commit to each other and I think it is right that gay people should be able to get married too," he said. "This is, yes, about equality. But it is also about making our society stronger."

Officials have stressed that all religious organizations can decide for themselves if they want to "opt in" to holding gay weddings. However, the Church of England, the country's official faith, is barred from performing such ceremonies.

That provision aims to ensure that the Church, which opposes gay marriage, is protected from legal claims that as the official state religion it must marry anyone who requests it.

Currently same-sex couples only have the option of a civil partnership, which offers the same legal rights and protections on issues such as inheritance, pensions, and child maintenance.

Supporters say that gay relationships should be treated exactly the same way as heterosexual ones, but critics worry that the proposals would change long-standing views about the meaning of marriage. Some Conservatives also fear the proposals would cost the party a significant number of votes in the next election.

"Marriage is the union between a man and a woman, has been historically, remains so. It is Alice in Wonderland territory, Orwellian almost, for any government of any political persuasion to seek to come along and try to re-write the lexicon," Conservative lawmaker Roger Gale said.

If passed, the bill's provisions would come into effect in 2015. They apply only to England and Wales - there are no plans for similar legislation in Northern Ireland. Scotland is considering introducing a similar bill.

CBS Radio's Vicki Barker reports from London that Tony and Barry Drewett-Barlow have been in a civil partnership for seven years. They are devout Christians who want a Christian wedding.

"For Barry and I it's about being able to stand up in front of the altar in our local church and say our vows," Tony said, "not only to each other and in law, but also in the eyes of God -- and that's a really important step."

© 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
34 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eroteme2 says:
What a disgusting picture!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FormerUSMCSergeant says:
Noval53 replies: Well duh; the Brits just did.
---
Must be tough being you - unable to perceive the obvious and all....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WWDIII says:
"Well; promoting this will certainly help prevent unwanted pregnancies."

-----

Actually, fertility rates tend to go up following pro-gay legislation.

The only thing that gay marriage will do is promote the idea, among young people who are at the height of their reproductive years, "hey, this domestic stuff is actually kind of cool."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Noval53 says:
Well; promoting this will certainly help prevent unwanted pregnancies.
reply
FormerUSMCSergeant replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It's not about promotion, twit.
Noval53 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well duh; the Brits just did. Couldn't care less what they do there.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FormerUSMCSergeant says:
Nobodyhasthisname says:I think my breakfast just came up again.
---
Choke on it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FormerUSMCSergeant says:
erzkarlaspern replies: Discrimination? What about animal lovers being able to marry their pets?
---
The genuinely stupid always have a hard time distinguishing between what's a crime (pedophilia, beastiality, necrophelia) and that which is not (homosexuality).
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
EvolvedLiberal says:
As long as Jesus is a bigot, I'll be a bigot too.
reply
FormerUSMCSergeant replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jesus espoused tolerance.
You obviously do not.
VICTORYDEMZ2012 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jesus spent his time hanging out with 12 of his best loved male friends. I don't think he had a problem with homosexuality at all...he never said anything about it anyway.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erzkarlaspern says:
Marriage has always been the Basic Institution of every society. It is a responsible stable union of male and female humans for the reproduction of the species and the raising of the children to responsible participation in their society --tribe, city state, nation. The ancient homosexual Greeks only married women. Marriage makes the family, which is the cornerstone of every society, which is why society recognizes and honors it. This does not offer any benefit to society. It is only to the couple's benefit. Soon the Bisexuals will be seeking a man and a women to marry, or at least one of each if not more, and the pandering politicians will bend over backwards (no insinuation intended) to satisfy them. If anything or any one must be "satisfied", then why not brothers and sisters, or parents and their children, or people and animals, or polygamists, or community marriage believers? To deny temt would be discrimination??? Or is it Only Homosexuals are to be pandered to? The Politically Correct are Politically Clowns and unthinking. Dr Martin Luther King once wrote, "For most people, there is nothing more disagreeable than having to think". David Cameron and Barack Obama are two more of many examples of that. What is truly Correct is Not Expedient.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimmydon7 says:
O my, Western Christendom is on life support, the teachings of the Apostle Paul in Romans and the Law Giver Moses all make clear that gay intimacy i.e. sexual contact is an abomination. Make no mistake about it men lying with men as one does a woman is an affront to God and high level insult against his majesty.
reply
WWDIII replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Paul was painted as a jerk in the New Testament. Even according to his own letters, he was tormented over whether or not he was really authentic. When you get right down to it, Paul was at best an early leader in the Church, at worst one of the biggest fools in the history of the religion.

The early Christians were really too busy with more serious matters to bother the gay people, and they really did not give a hoot in Hell either way about sodomy, in actual practice.

The persecution came later, namely under those emperors of Rome who were bore chief responsibility for Rome's decline.
erzkarlaspern replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Correct. It is quite ridiculous to call these two homosexuals "devout Christians" just as it would be to call two adulterers or prostitutes or bestialists "devout Christians". Devout signifies adhering to the teachings of the faith. They and their church are deceived by Satan.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FormerUSMCSergeant says:
BSerNChief says: IF England or others wants to be gay-friendly great.
---
You on the other hand prefer the gay-hate approach, apparently.
reply
erzkarlaspern replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
This habit of calling anybody who disagrees on this issue "hater" is done by Poor Victims and Tolerant Righteous (only for homosexuals). Homosexual unions add nothing to society. Marriage and reproduction in a stable union is for the family, the basic unit of society and which benefit society by adding new members and caring for them in their dependency and socializing them to be useful members of society. Natural biological marriage enriches society, That's why there are Two and only two sexes and why any union that is not a stable and responsible one has been rejected by all societies. What is needed for non-reproductive unions is Civil Unions that grant them some benefits as does corporate law.
See all 34 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right