AP/ December 24, 2012, 8:20 AM

U.S. Army to train Africa forces in anti-terror

In this May 11, 2010 file photo Senegalese Special Forces soldiers conduct close-quarter battle drills with U.S. Special Operations Forces advisers during a military training engagement in Bamako, Mali - part of Exercise Flintlock 10.

In this May 11, 2010 file photo Senegalese Special Forces soldiers conduct close-quarter battle drills with U.S. Special Operations Forces advisers during a military training engagement in Bamako, Mali - part of Exercise Flintlock 10. / US Army

WASHINGTON A U.S. Army brigade will begin sending small teams into as many as 35 African nations early next year, part of an intensifying Pentagon effort to train countries to battle extremists and give the U.S. a ready and trained force to dispatch to Africa if crises requiring the U.S. military emerge.

The teams will be limited to training and equipping efforts, and will not be permitted to conduct military operations without specific, additional approvals from the secretary of defense.

The sharper focus on Africa by the U.S. comes against a backdrop of widespread insurgent violence across North Africa, and as the African Union and other nations discuss military intervention in northern Mali.

The terror threat from al Qaeda linked groups in Africa has been growing steadily, particularly with the rise of the extremist Islamist sect Boko Haram in Nigeria. Officials also believe that the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, which killed the ambassador and three other Americans, may have been carried out by those who had ties to al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.

This first-of-its-kind brigade assignment — involving teams from the 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division — will target countries such as Libya, Sudan, Algeria and Niger, where al Qaeda-linked groups have been active. It also will assist nations like Kenya and Uganda that have been battling al-Shabab militants on the front lines in Somalia.

Gen. Carter Ham, the top U.S. commander in Africa, noted that the brigade has a small drone capability that could be useful in Africa. But he also acknowledged that he would need special permission to tap it for that kind of mission.

"If they want them for (military) operations, the brigade is our first sourcing solution because they're prepared," said Gen. David Rodriguez, the head of U.S. Army Forces Command. "But that has to go back to the secretary of defense to get an execute order."

Already the U.S. military has plans for nearly 100 different exercises, training programs and other activities across the widely diverse continent. But the new program faces significant cultural and language challenges, as well as nagging questions about how many of the lower-level enlisted members of the brigade, based in Fort Riley, Kan., will participate, since the teams would largely be made up of more senior enlisted troops and officers. A full brigade numbers about 3,500, but the teams could range from just a few people to a company of about 200. In rare cases for certain exercises, it could be a battalion, which would number about 800.

To bridge the cultural gaps with the African militaries, the Army is reaching out across the services, the embassies and a network of professional organizations to find troops and experts that are from some of the African countries. The experts can be used during training, and the troops can both advise or travel with the teams as they begin the program.

"In a very short time frame we can only teach basic phrases," said Col. Matthew McKenna, commander of the 162nd Infantry Brigade that will begin training the Fort Riley soldiers in March for their African deployment. "We focus on culture and the cultural impact — how it impacts the African countries' military and their operations."

Thomas Dempsey, a professor with the Africa Center for Strategic Studies, said the biggest challenge will be the level of cultural, language and historical diversity across the far-flung continent.

"How do you train for that in a way that would be applicable wherever they go?" said Dempsey, a retired Army colonel. He said he's not sure using a combat brigade is the right answer, but added, "I'm not sure what the answer is. The security challenges differ so dramatically that, to be honest, I really don't think it's feasible to have a continental training package."

The Pentagon's effort in Africa, including the creation of U.S. Africa Command in 2007, has been carefully calibrated, largely due to broad misgivings across the continent that it could spawn American bases or create the perception of an undue U.S. military influence there. As a result, the command has been based in Stuttgart, Germany, rather than on the African continent.


1/2

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
9 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BrianWI says:
Thanks for the interesting story. Regardless of what one thinks of this effort or the policy behind it, it is important that the media bring it forward so Americans can know about it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
totos_dreaming says:
No matter the reasons; no matter your political views.... please keep these soldiers in your prayers! I just happen to be a mother of a soldier in the 2nd Brigade that is going to Africa. He wants nothing more than to spend time with his baby brothers and make his family proud! Seeing statemnets such as "these are the first guys to go"... well, kind of rough on a family!
So, whatever your religious beliefs may be... let's just pray that our boys and girls are safe!! Cause we damn sure can't fix everything in a day!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PourpaixPourpaix says:
Well, at least we know which 35 African governments are going to cause us problems by 2020.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
judymar14 says:
lol, training forces in Iraq and Afghanistan has worked so well. rotfl!

What is not funny is more of our soliders will be put in harms way. They will be the first to be killed by these so called 'extremist'. The African word used for 'insurgents'.
reply
quincytodd replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well said, Judymar14. We need to quit butting in. Here at home, our economy is about to go over the so-called "fiscal cliff" and those idiots in Washington want to throw away more money on these foreign wars of theirs!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
usunus says:
We could not control the situation in liberated Libya and Benghazi.Islamists,a minority no doubt,still dominate Libya.The same thing will prevail in other African countries with sizeable Muslim populations.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
higg187 says:
I wonder if you are going to see a the liberals make a fuss over this. Probably not since it was ok for Clinton to send troops and now there great savior Obama. But when Bush sent troops they put him on a cross and left him to burn. It's funny how the liberals always have two sides of looking at things.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Did we learn NOTHING from Vietnam???????
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Here we go AGAIN, getting involved in other people's business!
reply