U.K. inquiry: Media needs independent regulator

Updated at 12:21 p.m. ET

LONDON Britain needs an independent media regulator established by law to eliminate a subculture of unethical behavior that infected segments of the country's press, a national inquiry into the country's media has concluded.

Lord Justice Brian Leveson said in a report released Thursday a new regulatory body should be established in law to prevent more people being hurt by "press behavior that, at times, can only be described as outrageous."

Leveson insisted in his report that politicians and the government should play no role in regulating the press, which should be done by a new body with much stronger powers than the current Press Complaints Commission.

"What is needed is a genuinely independent and effective system of self-regulation," he said. "The ball moves back into the politicians' court: they must now decide who guards the guardians."

• U.K. phone hacking scandal: Key players
• British PM David Cameron coy about phone hacking inquiry results

Leveson issued his 2,000-page report at the end of a media ethics inquiry that was triggered by revelations of tabloid phone hacking and expanded to engulf senior figures in politics, the police and Rupert Murdoch's media empire.

Prime Minister David Cameron set up the Leveson inquiry after revelations of illegal eavesdropping by Murdoch's now-defunct News of the World tabloid sparked a criminal investigation and a wave of public revulsion.

Parliament will have to approve the legal changes the report recommends, and Cameron is under intense pressure from both sides. He is also tainted by his own ties to prominent figures in the scandal.

Leveson's proposals will likely be welcomed by victims of press intrusion and some politicians who want to see the country's voracious press reined in. But some editors and lawmakers fear any new regulator could curtail freedom of the press.

15 Photos

UK hacking scandal's famous targets

Leveson said it was "essential that there should be legislation to underpin the independent self-regulatory system."

He said the new body should be composed of members of the public including former journalists and academics — but no serving editors or politicians. It should have the power to demand prominent corrections in newspapers and to levy fines of up to 1 million pounds ($1.6 million).

Cameron welcomed Leveson's proposal for a new regulator with powers to settle disputes, order corrections and fine offenders.

But he said that asking legislators to enshrine it in law meant "crossing the Rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into the law of the land."

"I believe that we should be wary of any legislation that has the potential to infringe free speech and a free press," Cameron told lawmakers in the House of Commons. "In this House which has been a bulwark of democracy for centuries, we should think very, very carefully before crossing this line."

Cameron called on the press to implement Leveson's proposals itself, and quickly.

"While nobody wants to see full statutory regulation, the status quo is not an option," he said. "The system of press regulation we have is badly broken and it has let down victims badly."

Critics of the tabloid press generally welcomed the report.

Former Formula One boss Max Mosley, who sued Murdoch's News Corp. for invasion of privacy over claims he had taken art in a Nazi-themed orgy, said Leveson's report went in the right direction, although "I would have liked to see more."

Campaign group Hacked Off said Leveson's proposals "are reasonable and proportionate and we call on all parties to get together to implement them as soon as possible."

The furor erupted in 2011 when it was revealed that the News of the World had eavesdropped on the mobile phone voicemails of slain schoolgirl Milly Dowler while police were searching for the 13-year-old.

Murdoch shut down the 168-year-old newspaper in July 2011. His U.K. newspaper company, News International, has paid millions in damages to dozens of hacking victims and faces lawsuits from dozens more, from celebrities, politicians, athletes and crime victims whose voicemails were hacked in the paper's quest for scoops.

Leveson heard evidence from hundreds of journalists, politicians, lawyers and victims of press intrusion during months of hearings that provided a dramatic, sometimes comic and often poignant window on the workings of the media. Witnesses ranged from celebrities such as Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling and Hugh Grant — who both complained of intrusive treatment — to the parents of Dowler, who described how learning that their daughter's voicemail had been accessed had given them false hope that she was alive.

Leveson said that the ongoing criminal investigation constrained him from accusing other newspapers of illegal behavior, but argued there was a subculture of unethical behavior "within some parts of some titles."

While many editors have denied knowing about phone hacking, Leveson said it "was far more than a covert, secret activity, known to nobody save one or two practitioners of the `dark arts."'

More broadly, he said newspapers had been guilty of "recklessness in prioritizing sensational stories almost irrespective of the harm the stories may cause."

"In each case, the impact has been real and, in some cases, devastating," the judge said.

The hacking scandal has rocked Britain's press, political and police establishments, who were revealed to enjoy an often cozy relationship in which drinks, dinners and sometimes money were traded for influence and information.

Several senior police officers resigned over the failure to aggressively pursue an earlier investigation of phone hacking at the News of the World in 2007. But Leveson said "the inquiry has not unearthed extensive evidence of police corruption."

He said over the past three decades, political parties "have had or developed too close a relationship with the press in a way which has not been in the public interest."

He acquitted senior politicians of wrongdoing, but recommended that political parties publish statements "setting out, for the public, an explanation of the approach they propose to take as a matter of party policy in conducting relationships with the press."

Former Murdoch editors and journalists subsequently charged with phone hacking, police bribery or other wrongdoing include Cameron's former spokesman, Andy Coulson, and ex-News of the World editor Rebekah Brooks, a friend of the prime minister.

Coulson and Brooks were appearing in court Thursday on charges of paying public officials for information.

[IPonUall2]

In America,
What we need is corporate regulation.
We don't need a ministry of propaganda.
What we need is infrastructure investment.
What we need is reform.
We have to rid ourselves of this bush legacy dept. of Homeland Defense, which is akin to the GESTAPO.
We need prosecution of the previous administration's officers.

In England,
Remove the authority of the Queen to place ministers of her church into political office.
Remove the House of Lords from Parliament.
Government reform, allow direct vote of the people to elect the Prime Minister.
Bring back civil liberty, rights to privacy, gun rights etc.
Post all areas that have police cameras with signs letting the community know they are being observed. It's Orwellian there.
Dont change your healthcare system, it fine.

[usunus]

An " independent ' regulator will be as meaningful as the " non-profit " ans " non-partisan " outfits in the U.S.The days of independent thinkers are dead and gone.

[samXXkiley]

coucou,
An independent media regulator would be more appropriate it will limit the intervention of the system
anyway, a free press to 100% does not exist.
"au revoir"

[busterthedawgy]

I say this as a liberal and former newspaper reporter: Do nothing to limit a free press. That takes us down a slippery slope to outright censorship.

[sciline]

In case it hasn't been noticed, the days of "Self-Regulating" and "Self-Policing" on the Assumption that Ethical Behavior will be adhered to and maintained by any individual or Company, have been long gone! Gone, because it has long been replaced by GREED! When it comes to a choice between Ethical Behavior and "Profits", "Profits" will win every time! This is why STRICT ENFORCEMENT of any and all Regulations through regular and FULLY DOCUMENTED, and C0-Signed, INSPECTIONS are, not only essential, but Imperative for the sake of the Health, Physical and Mental, of our Society. Any one or any Agency that "Assumes " otherwise, or "Assumes" anything, is either too lazy or too incompetent to verify!

[busterthedawgy]

Which type of dictatorship do you want?

[nerdavenger]

Horrible. Those acts were already criminal, so how do new laws and regulations help? And why does this new "independent" body have the power to force "corrections" and fines, when (a) such power just invites abuse, and (b) it has nothing to do with the illegal phone tapping that is *supposedly* the trigger for all of this?

I think someone just sees this criminal scandal as an opening for press regulation that he had wanted for a long time. Reminds me a bit of the 2009 financial crisis that apparently could only be stemmed by healthcare reform.

[hlmelsaidtwitter]

New body of regulatory to prevent bad press behavior.

[touria55]

we need one in America...

[tryingtodogoodwork]

It's long past time for Murdoch to go. The U.K. finding that he is unsuitable to run a corporation opens the door for the U.S. to forbid him from doing business in this country.

The Murdoch cancer needs to be cut out. Now.

[Johnson-4]

There are plenty of laws already on the books to regulate this activity. This is just another politician showboating to get more votes. Also, the term "independent regulator" is an oxymoron.