Opponents of same-sex marriage march in France

People demonstrate against the government's plan to legalize same-sex marriage and adoption for same-sex couples, in Marseille, France, Saturday, Nov. 17, 2012. Banners read "Marriage = one man + one woman, child = one mother + one father." / AP Photo/Claude Paris
PARIS Groups opposing President Francois Hollande's plan to legalize gay marriage and adoption took to the streets across France on Saturday.
Hollande said he would enact his "marriage for everyone" plan within a year of coming to power in May, but vocal opposition from religious leaders, some politicians and parts of rural France has divided the country.
Saturday's protest, called the "March for Everyone," included pro-family and Catholic groups. Several thousand people marched in Paris, carrying signs with slogans such as "One child (equals) one father + one mother."
Their final destination was the Invalides monument, the final resting place of Napeolon Bonaparte, the French leader who invented the country's prized civil code, which is still in force today. It states that marriage is a union between a man and a woman, a point the gay marriage bill seeks to overturn. Another reform would be to replace the entries in a child's registry book from "father" and "mother" to "parent 1" and "parent 2."
Elsewhere, France's largest demonstrations estimated to be several thousand people strong took place in Toulouse and France's second city, Lyon.
The marches Saturday had a dress code of blue, white and pink putting a spin on the French tricolore flag's traditional colors of blue, white and red.
A recent survey found that most French favor gay marriage, while support for adoption by gay couples hovers at around 50 percent.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Photos of the week 22 Photos
- Graphic video: Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack Play Video
- Toronto mayor: I don't smoke crack cocaine
- Bangladesh slum life 13 Photos
- NKorean envoy delivers letter to China's president
- Inside a Bangladesh garment factory 10 Photos
- Deadly car bombing at aid group's house in Kabul
- Tokyo's rockabilly scene 16 Photos













And Elohim blessed them, and Elohim said to them, "Be fruitful and increase",... Genesis 1:27-28
Elohim is the Hebrew term for God.
Elohim did not create homosexuals, nor lesbians, neither trans-sexuals. That is a result of sin.
And for those who wish to come out of that sin, there is a way----the way is Yahshuah(Jesus). He can deliver you from that demon.
Actually, God did create homosexuals. Ask any psychologist or therapist on the planet. Homosexuality is not pathologized, curable, or unhealthy. If you think that it is a sin then maybe you are listening to some demons of your own. If God is anything, he is benevolent. A true benevolent God would NEVER tell homosexuals that they are sinning. Only ignorance would lead you to believe such things.
But none of that matters because marriage as a religious institution is different from marriage as a social contract. No one has ever said that your religion can't choose who it allows to marry. Civil marriage is a social contract. It is a human right for anyone who is a consenting adult.
You seem to be back away from your beliefs based on some anti-Christ revisionist theory that supports such a prurient nature. That's why hell is there, to punish wicked people.
I never saw much about gay people marrying, genetic modified foods, and stem cells used for creating clones and or freezing embryos. Sure, the book "Brave new World," address the latter of these modern practices. But homosexual marriage, never.
It came from a Heavy-handed government-driven society that refused to allow any other view.
The idea of blacks being denied their rights is hideous to me but i just can't make the connect to blacks and not getting hunting licences. i dont agree with the comparison. I love all people gay or straight. But i personally dont see homosexuality as a race , It is their free choice. but i hold the view of traditional marriage between a man and woman . i need to get to work THANKS for the discussion