AP/ November 16, 2012, 7:39 AM

Outrage grows after death of woman denied life-saving abortion

Demonstrators from India's main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) shout slogans against the Irish government for the death of Indian national Savita Halappanavar, who died in Ireland after doctors allegedly refused her an abortion, in front of the Embassy of Ireland in New Delhi on November 16, 2012.

Demonstrators from India's main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) shout slogans against the Irish government for the death of Indian national Savita Halappanavar, who died in Ireland after doctors allegedly refused her an abortion, in front of the Embassy of Ireland in New Delhi on November 16, 2012. / RAVEENDRAN/AFP/Getty Images

DUBLIN Pressure mounted Thursday for the Irish government to draft a law spelling out when life-saving abortions can be performed - a demand that came after a pregnant woman who was denied an abortion died.

Activists protested Thursday night in Belfast a day after thousands rallied in London, Dublin, Cork and Galway in memory of Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old dentist who died a week after doctors said she was starting to miscarry her 17-week-old fetus.

Despite her rising pain, doctors refused her request for an abortion for three days because the fetus had a heartbeat. She died in the hospital from blood poisoning three days after the fetus died and was surgically removed.

Irish gynecologists demanded Thursday that the government close a 20-year-old hole in the country's abortion law that leaves them fearing prosecution if they abort a fetus to protect a woman's life.

"We would like to be able to practice medicine in a safe environment legally. The current situation is like a sword of Damocles hanging over us," Dr. Peter Boylan of the Irish Institute of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said Thursday. "If we do something with a good intention, but it turns out to be illegal, the consequences are extremely serious for medical practitioners."

Savita Halappanavar

/ Courtesy of The Irish Times

Halappanavar died Oct. 28 but her husband went public with the situation this week after taking his wife's body back home to India for cremation.

In India, newspaper headlines Thursday accused Ireland of committing a murder. Halappanavar's husband and parents gave a string of interviews expressing incomprehension that Ireland - a country boasting one of the world's lowest maternal mortality rates - could have handled her emergency so poorly.

"In an attempt to save a 4-month-old fetus they killed my 30-year-old daughter. How is that fair, you tell me?" her mother, A. Mahadevi, told Indian television.

Some of Ireland's leading experts on maternal care said they long had feared that a death like Halappanavar's would happen - not because doctors don't want to save the lives of their patients, but because Irish law on abortion makes them fearful of taking action on borderline cases.

In parliament, hours after 2,000 citizens outside the gates held a candlelit vigil demanding reforms in Ireland's prohibitive abortion laws, Deputy Prime Minister Eamon Gilmore said the government would act "to bring legal clarity to this issue as quickly as possible."

That would mean a law, or Health Department regulations, spelling out the precise medical circumstances when a doctor can abort a fetus in a country that officially bans the practice except to save the life of the mother.

Boylan, former chief of one of Dublin's leading maternity hospitals, Holles Street, said this often is a difficult call to make.

While he declined to discuss Halappanavar's case specifically, he noted that cases such as hers, where a woman's cervix is fully dilated for days and the risk of infection grows, represent a potentially life-threatening condition but not a certain one.

" There are very few absolute certainties in medicine," he said. "As you get less probable, that's where we run into difficulties. ... there are circumstances where our hands are tied."

Despite the pressure, few political analysts expect Ireland's government to take swift action to make clear when abortions can take place. For the past two decades, successive governments have refused to pass legislation in line with a landmark 1992 Supreme Court judgment that found women should receive abortions in Ireland if their pregnancy posed a "real and substantial risk" to their life, but not their health.

Abortion remains perhaps the most polarizing issue in Ireland despite the decline of faith in the Catholic Church, battered by a string of child-abuse scandals. Opinion polls show majority support for legalizing abortion, but politicians advocating liberalized access to abortion are confined largely to Gilmore's Labour Party, the smaller member of Ireland's 20-month-old coalition government. Other parties, including Prime Minister Enda Kenny's Fine Gael, are broadly opposed.

"For Irish society, abortion is an intractable issue. For politicians it's untouchable," said Dearbhail McDonald, legal editor of the Irish Independent. "This is the kind of thing that brings down a government. They will not risk it."

She wrote a deeply personal column Thursday in her paper, noting she was the same age - 35 - as the woman at the center of the 1992 Supreme Court ruling. That girl, then 14, had been raped by a neighbor. When her parents went to the police, the government tried to stop her from traveling to England for an abortion. The court ruled that the girl should receive an abortion in Ireland because she was threatening to kill herself if refused.

McDonald said many Irish women identified with the plight of that girl, identified only as X, and with Halappanavar, whose smiling face dominated the front page of every Irish newspaper Thursday.

"It's hard to explain the depth of anger and sorrow Savita's death has ignited in me - a visceral rage that has reduced me, and many of my friends, to tears of exasperation and despair," she wrote. "All of us thinking: That could have been me. All of us thinking: Why haven't we sorted out this mess?"

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
29 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kylem814 says:
This story was especially painful for me to swallow because not only did a woman die in dreadful circumstances, but it happened as a result of her first amendment freedoms being denied. She was already planning on sacrificing an awful lot, realizing she was going to lose her child, but for her to not be allowed to save herself is sickening.

I mean this is about 100 levels above being denied her freedom of speech,she was literally denied her right to life. There is no justification for the rights that this woman was denied. You can't play the "you are killing a person when you get an abortion" card because if that's the case, this time two people died.

I hold a heavy heart for her family because she was forced to her own death. She was not allowed to excercise her freedom of expression and died because so.

I hope the people in control of these decisions are happy, now that they have contributed to making a woman die against her will.

--Kyle Macedo
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wtcmedic911 says:
Why dont they take a plane back home to India?
Ive worked/lived in countries where I KNEW what the laws, rules, customs are. Dont like Ireland? GO HOME!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jnj3225 says:
+Men would only become pregnant in the right relationship.
We wouldnt so easily spread our legs because the other person says
they love us. BAM!
reply
MWMaury replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They were married. She wanted to have a child and so did he. The baby died.....................

The baby was dead inside her already. They just refused to take it out. You didn't even read the article instead of preaching about dating.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jnj3225 says:
If they would have aborted the baby,she still would have died.
reply
MWMaury replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JNJ3225 You are obviously a stupid moron. A very stupid one who is ill informed. Did you even read the article? She was MARRIED, and yes she would have survived--the baby was dead. Something decaying inside you poisons the blood.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jnj3225 says:
If they would have aborted the baby,she still would have died.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tvwatcher5345 says:
i don't understand the loyalty to the roman catholic church in ireland, it just preyed on the children in ireland, finally the government found some backbone and recalled its ambassador from the vatican, but the hindus are wierd with their caste system with untouchables?? ....i think these two deserve eachother
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
flexsf says:
You own this, Catholic Inc. Your attitude sucks and I support all efforts to break your back!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
smc021-2009 says:
Hindus wont eat beef but they will kill and unborn child
reply
KPeters_from_UK replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OMG!!! What the freak does that comment have to do with the needless death of a viable intelligent woman? Needless...unnecessary...preventable death of a viable woman?
Larnan5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Serious insanity. SMC021 needs interention
linkicon reporticon emailicon
npbstl says:
Christian oppression.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus111 says:
Yes, it was MURDER.
reply
See all 29 Comments