Panetta calls on NATO to "fill the gap" in training Afghanistan's national defense forces

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks after a meeting of NATO Defense Ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Oct. 10, 2012. / AP
BRUSSELS Defense Secretary Leon Panetta urged NATO defense ministers Wednesday to help fill the shortfall of military training teams in Afghanistan in order to build the capabilities of the Afghan forces so they can take control of their country's security by the end of 2014.
In remarks to the ministers' conference here, Panetta asked that they provide the 58 teams that are needed, and give those commitments by later next month.
"The U.S. has filled a disproportionate number of these teams in recent years, and I ask for your help to fill the gap," Panetta said, calling this a "critical moment" in the war.
- Video: War in Afghanistan enters 12th year
- Pakistan blocks protest of U.S. drone strikes
- 2 U.S. troops, 2 Afghan police killed in fighting
The ministers are gathering in Belgium to deliberate the next phase of the Afghanistan war and to hear how military commanders plan to tamp down the insider attacks that have killed or injured 130 allied forces.
Officials here are also expected to formally announce that the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Marine Gen. John Allen, will be the next NATO supreme allied commander. Allen is slated to take over early next year, and Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, the assistant Marine commandant, would take the top Afghanistan job. The changes must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
During the meeting, Allen and Panetta assured the ministers that commanders have come up with a range of ways to reduce the insider attacks in which Afghans, or insurgents wearing their uniforms, have turned their guns on allied forces.
The tactics to reduce the attacks have largely been in place for some time. They include increased vetting of Afghan recruits, enhanced training and cultural awareness, greater use of so-called guardian angel troops who stand guard to protect their comrades, and a new system that requires partnered operations with small units to be approved by top commanders.
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen began the meeting saying that the coalition of 50 nations contributing to the Afghanistan fight will begin to withdraw their forces between now and the end of 2014, as planned. And he seemed to reject any idea that there will be any acceleration in the drawdown, despite concerns about the insider attacks.
"This is not about speeding up," said Rasmussen, adding that the coalition will execute a careful, deliberate and coordinated process for the transfer of security to the Afghans by the time the NATO combat mission ends in 2014.
At that time, NATO will change to a training and advisory mission. NATO ministers are expected to endorse a broad framework for that transition during their meeting here.
That mission is also likely to include continued counterterrorism efforts by the U.S. There have been suggestions that a force of as many as 20,000 troops could remain in Afghanistan after the end of 2014, but no decisions have been made. Allen is expected to provide some recommendations before the end of the year on the pace and number of U.S. troops leaving Afghanistan beginning in 2013.
Dunford has been assistant commandant since October 2010. Allen took over the Afghanistan job in July 2011, after serving as the acting commander of U.S. Central Command for a short time.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Iran hangs alleged U.S., Israeli spies
- North Korea fires short-range missiles for second day
- Two imprisoned over killing Malcolm X's grandson
- Afghanistan to ask India for military aid
- Photos of the Week 21 Photos
- Assad: Syria transition talks are internal matter
- Plane catches fire on Moscow runway Play Video
- Dramatic video appears to show 747 crash in Afghanistan
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Whatever the right-wing thugs in Washington order, NATO always does without fail. Those useless bureaucrats over these have no moral principles so the only thing that matters with them is the sheer will of Washington D.C. no matter how many lives are needlessly lost in the process!
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Why don't we outsource the training operations to the Taliban? They obviously know their tactics better than anyone, and they can use the money. We meanwhile will get to engage in our favorite national pasttime, contracting military operations out to private entities.
- reply













