AP/ October 9, 2012, 10:54 AM

Pakistani teen girls' activist Malala Yousufzai shot on school bus by Taliban gunman

A wounded Pakistani girl, Malala Yousufzai, is moved to a helicopter to be taken to Peshawar for treatment in Mingora, Swat Valley, Pakistan on Oct. 9, 2012.

A wounded Pakistani girl, Malala Yousufzai, is moved to a helicopter to be taken to Peshawar for treatment in Mingora, Swat Valley, Pakistan on Oct. 9, 2012. / AP

MINGORA, Pakistan A Taliban gunman walked up to a bus taking children home from school in Pakistan's volatile Swat Valley on Tuesday and shot and wounded a 14-year-old activist known for championing the education of girls and publicizing atrocities committed by the Taliban, officials said.

The attack in the city of Mingora targeted 14-year-old Malala Yousufzai, who is widely respected for her work to promote the schooling of girls — something that the Taliban strongly opposes. She was nominated last year for the International Children's Peace Prize.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack, calling Malala's work "obscenity."

"This was a new chapter of obscenity, and we have to finish this chapter," said Taliban spokesman Ahsanullah Ahsan by telephone. "We have carried out this attack."

The school bus was about to leave the school grounds in Mingora when a bearded man approached it and asked which one of the girls was Malala, said Rasool Shah, the police chief in the town. Another girl pointed to Malala, but the activist denied it was her and the gunmen then shot both of the girls, the police chief said.

Malala was shot twice — once in the head and once in the neck — but her wounds were not life-threatening, said Tariq Mohammad, a doctor at the main hospital in Mingora. The second girl shot was in stable condition, the doctor said. Pakistani television showed pictures of Malala being taken by helicopter to a military hospital in the frontier city of Peshawar.

A wounded Pakistani girl, Malala Yousufzai, is moved to a helicopter.

Malala Yousufzai is moved to a helicopter to be taken to Peshawar for treatment in Mingora, Swat Valley, Pakistan, Oct. 9, 2012.

/ AP

In the past, the Taliban has threatened Malala and her family for her activism. When she was only 11 years old, she began writing a blog under a pseudonym for the BBC's Urdu service about life under Taliban occupation. After the Taliban were ejected from the Swat Valley in the summer of 2009, she began speaking out publicly about the militant group and the need for girls' education.

While chairing a session of a children's assembly supported by UNICEF in the valley last year, the then-13-year-old championed a greater role for young people.

"Girl members play an active role," she said, according to an article on the U.N. organization's website. "We have highlighted important issues concerning children, especially promoting girls' education in Swat."

The attack displayed the viciousness of Islamic militants in the Swat Valley, where the military conducted a major operation in 2009 to clear out insurgents. It was a reminder of the challenges the government faces in keeping the area free of militant influence.

The scenic valley — nicknamed the Switzerland of Pakistan — was once a popular tourist destination for Pakistanis, and honeymooners used to vacation in the numerous hotels dotted along the river running through Swat. But the Taliban's near-total takeover of the valley just 175 miles (280 kilometers) from the capital in 2008 shocked many Pakistanis, who considered militancy to be a far-away problem in Afghanistan or Pakistan's rugged tribal regions.

Militants began asserting their influence in Swat in 2007 — part of a wave of al Qaeda and Taliban fighters expanding their reach from safe havens near the Afghan border. By 2008 they controlled much of the valley and began meting out their own brand of justice.

They forced men to grow beards, restricted women from going to the bazaar, whipped women they considered immoral and beheaded opponents.

During the roughly two years of their rule, Taliban in the region destroyed around 200 schools. Most were girls' institutions, though some prominent boys' schools were struck as well.

At one point, the Taliban said they were halting female education, a move that echoed their militant brethren in neighboring Afghanistan who during their rule barred girls from attending school.

While the Pakistani military managed to flush out the insurgents during the military operation, their Taliban's top leadership escaped, leaving many of the valley's residents on edge.

Kamila Hayat, a senior official of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, praised Malala for standing up to the militants and sending a message across the world that Pakistani girls had the courage to fight for their rights. But she also worried that Tuesday's shooting would prevent other parents from letting their children speak out against the Taliban.

"This is an attack to silence courage through a bullet," Hayat said. "These are the forces who want to take us to the dark ages."

The problems of young women in Pakistan were also the focus of a separate case before the high court, which ordered a probe into an alleged barter of seven girls to settle a blood feud in a remote southwestern district. Such feuds in Pakistan's tribal areas often arise from disputes between families or tribes and can last generations.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry began proceedings into the allegations, which were first reported in the local media. The alleged trade happened in the Dera Bugti district of Baluchistan province between two groups within the Bugti tribe, one of the more prominent in the province.

A tribal council ordered the barter in early September, the district deputy commissioner, Saeed Faisal, told the court. He did not know the girls' ages but local media reported they were between 4 and 13 years old.

However, the Advocate General for the province could not confirm the incident.

Chaudhry, the chief justice, ordered Faisal to ensure that all members of the tribal council appear in court on Wednesday, as well as a local lawmaker who belongs to one of the two sub-tribes believed involved in the incident.

The tradition of families exchanging unmarried girls to settle feuds is banned under Pakistani law but still practiced in the country's more conservative, tribal areas.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
85 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
quincytodd says:
I see that the right-wing thugs in Washington through the right-wing news media are milking this story for everything It's worth. Now they found yet another excuse to keep us in Pakistan and the American public is falling for it, sadly enough. This is quite repulsive indeed!
reply
rong2right replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Wow, Treadstone, nice heart.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ziayousufzai says:
she is hero and Taliban are coward.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AnyseJoslin says:
OK. Not ALL Muslims are crazy, thankfully. It is the few that poison the whole apple barrel. Shooting children is insane: totally, F*****g insane! I feel for her and her school mate who was also shot. However, what will resonate in the rest of this school for girls? They, too, will become victims of some radical pig one day? How can they return to school and "feel" safe again. What a bunch of sorrowful crap this is!
reply
quincytodd replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Please Anysejoslin, do keep the Tea Party lingo out of this as it has no place here. Pakistan needs a Communist Revolution and that's all there is to it, judging by this incident!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lerianis4 says:
Agreed, TONYROMANO63. We CAN cause some of these things ourselves by playing to the image of the "Great Satan" that some Muslims think we are. By killing men, women and children and then trying to ******** that "We are trying to FREE you!" and not realizing that some people can reason "Bullcrap! You are trying to kill us and doing a damned fine job of it!"........ we cause these things by marking everyone who cooperates with us and our interests/positions as a traitor to their home nation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Repubs_R_Fiscal_Liberals says:
Shot on a schoolbus?

Now that's class. <cough>
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
The obscenity in this is the Taliban.
reply
Lerianis4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sure about that? I could go over to Afghanistan and say that I was killing Afghanis on the orders of the American government, but that wouldn't make that true.

I think that mostly, this is a small cadre of whackjobs in the Taliban who are doing things like this and the Taliban leadership start banging their heads on the desks every time something like this happens, saying "You imbecile! This will turn a good portion of our supporters against us! Why did you do this horrible thing!?"

It could also be (and this is bluntly damned possible) that the "Taliban" person who did this was actually a CIA or other government stooge.

Read the history books. The CIA has done some damned bad things in the name of this country over the past 80 years.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MarielLynne says:
CBS, thank you for your recent accurate reporting! The Obama Administration tries to portray the Taliban as greatly composed of moderate, reasonable men, opposed to violence, but that is simply not true, as your article sadly points out. There is a great deal of evidence coming out from the intelligence community in the US and reported in the media is the UK, that the Taliban is as strong as ever and is closely linked to al qaeda and other terrorist groups. I don't know if military action in Afghanistan is the answer or whether the US should just get out and tighten security within the US and for US interests abroad, or whether more intensive military action is needed. A significant problem is Pakistan... I don't know. Glad I don't have to make that decision, but the Obama Admin. should tell the truth, not half-truths and lies. Time to be honest about the Taliban and terorism.
reply
TonyRomano63 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Obama never said anything of the kind. Your statement is just typical republican propaganda in hopes it will eco aroound the interenet and some how become true. Anyone can research the taliban, watch a documentry, or a few agonizingly true movies on netflix to know what scum bags the taliban is.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Repubs_R_Fiscal_Liberals says:
REPUBS_R_FISCAL_LIBERALS says:

Taliban? Guns?

Was it Palin?


EMPIREGEORGE---_______-- replies:
You have become nothing but an American-hating muslim sympathizer.....for you to equate Palin with this....there are no words to describe how sick you are.

-------------------

Empire - I served this country for decades. You didn't serve a day.

I dislike ALL revealed religions, like yours AND theirs. The people I dislike are the extremists and terrorists, and your religion has its own fair share of both - even recently.

And my point about Palin is dead on: she loves to shoot, and she's part of the Christian Taliban here in America.

.
reply
TonyRomano63 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
This is pretty tame for the Taliban. I mean she is still alive after all. They are known for worse when a women is suspected or just accussed of adultery. They would bury the women to her waste, tie her hands, and have her relitives her own children, and neighbors throw stones at he until she is dead. So this story is nothing new. Anyhow not even I could be ignorant enough to bring sarah in on this one.
Repubs_R_Fiscal_Liberals replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not even you could be so ignorant? Stunning endorsement of yourself!

Plenty of stoning in the Bible. The difference? We're not a theocracy, and you Christians would go to jail for doing so.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rjack61 says:
I sincerely hope no one on this blog is suggesting that the US presence in the Middle East is causing these sick idiots to do something like this to a child. If you really believe this, please feel free to join them in HADES!! There is room.
reply
retiredgustav replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If we weren't there it still would be happening, we just wouldn't know about it!
MarielLynne replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree, but what I will add is that Obama is soft on terrorism. Yes, we are in Afghanistan, but we are presented with a false narrative that the Taliban now has a softer, more reasonable side, and that is not true. It's not possible to work with these fanatics. So, it seems the choices are to get very aggressive and fight the Taliban, or to get out. Just not possible to continue the strategies that have been used. The Obama Admin. does not recognize the danger to the use posed by the Taliban, al qaeda, and the Muslim Brotherhood (just gave them over a billion dollars) and opposed to the use even of the term terrorist, and insisted that the Fort Hood massacre be called "workplace violence". We Americans may not feel that these people are enemies, but they are obsessed with harming us.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bradkt1 says:
As unfortunate and tragic as this is, this is not our problem. It is NOT the mission of the USA to try to save the world. I have news for you...the world doesn't want to be saved.

There are people in the U.S. who will point to this as justification for us to stay in Afghanistan to try to protect the Afghan people from the Taliban. They will say that we must continue to sacrifice our soldiers to continue this never-ending longest war in our history that we cannot win anyway.

It is simply not possible to prevent incidents like this...however tragic...from happening.

I say get out of Afghanistan and let these Taliban/Pakistani-inspired maggots take it back to the Stone Age. If the U.S. wants to grant political asylum to some Afghan citizens...fine.

Get out of Afghanistan...now! We are fighting no battles. We are winning no victories. We are only suffering casualties.
reply
TonyRomano63 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We are in Afganistan not to promote democracy or womens rights or even human rights. We are in Afganistan because it has strategic circumstances such that who ever is able to control it could control the regions oil supplies. In fact the US would likely benift as long as the Taliban is in charge because they are in the stone age, and as long as they are in the stone age they won't disrupt our oil supplies.
See all 85 Comments