Top U.S. counterterrorism adviser John Brennan in Libya amid questions over security missteps
John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, in Washington, Sept. 7, 2011. / AP
Senior White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan was in Tripoli to meet Libyan officials Tuesday as the Obama administration continues trying to build a complete picture of the events which led up to a fatal attack on the U.S. Consulate in the eastern city of Benghazi.
The visit by President Obama's senior counterterrorism adviser was leaked by a Libyan source to the media, to the consternation of White House officials who told CBS News correspondent Bill Plante the leak created a considerable security risk.
Brennan was to meet Mohammed Mageref, president of the Libyan Congress, as well as officials from the Libyan army, intelligence agencies and the interior and foreign ministries, according to the Reuters news agency, citing the anonymous Libyan official.
The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.
The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.
Ex-U.S. security team leader in Libya: "We needed more, not less" staff
According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.
Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less. For what reasons, I don't know."
Wood and others have portrayed a State Department in Washington that was either unwilling to provide American officials in Libya with the security they required or ignorant of the pressing security concerns in a country where the central government is weak, and Islamic extremist militias have enjoyed virtual free reign in the power vacuum created by the toppling and killing of long-time dictator Muammar Qaddafi.
Official on Libya attack: Al Qaeda rally was warning
In an interview for CBS This Morning on Tuesday, Wood told CBS News there were clear signs of the threat posed by Islamic militants in Benghazi in the weeks and months before the attack on the U.S. consulate. He claims there was a rally or protest organized by al Qaeda supporters in June 2012 in the city, which is about 400 miles east of Tripoli.
"That was another indicator to watch, to be aware of, and to try and compensate for as well," claimed Wood.
The State Department has told CBS News that Wood was stationed in Tripoli and was not involved of the assessment of security in Benghazi ahead of the Sept. 11 visit.
While Ansar al-Sharia - an Islamic fundamentalist militia in Benghazi considered a likely suspect in the consulate attack - is believed to have links to al Qaeda's North African branch, there has been no clear evidence that al Qaeda as an organization has a presence in Benghazi or played any direct role in the attack.
Several other militant groups have been mentioned as possible culprits, and CBS News senior correspondent John Miller says that discerning the specific identity of those responsible will be difficult due to the blurred lines between the myriad extremist groups operating in Libya, and the wider region.
"We want an organized picture: 'It was al Qaeda who ordered it, it was Ansar al-Sharia who carried it out, it was this group that assisted,'" Miller told CBS This Morning in late September. "The problem is, the lines have blurred between those groups and their members. Ansar al-Sharias are popping up in places like Benghazi, but also in Yemen, also in Tunisia, in all these countries. And they're not al Qaeda, but they are reading from the al Qaeda narrative and they are being influenced by people who are formerly influential extremists in al Qaeda."
Defense chief Leon Panetta has only gone so far as to say that "terrorists" were behind the attack, and it took him "a while" to even reach that conclusion.
Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that before the attack in Benghazi there was some intelligence about security threats in Libya, but it was not specific to the U.S. Consulate.
"There was a thread of intelligence reporting that groups in the environment in western -- correction -- eastern Libya were seeking to coalesce, but there wasn't anything specific and certainly not a specific threat to the consulate that I'm aware of," Dempsey said.
The State Department told CBS News' State Dept. correspondent Margaret Brennan that the withdrawal of security personnel prior to the Benghazi attack had, "no impact whatsoever on the total number of fully trained American security personnel in Libya overall or in Benghazi specifically." There was a Quick Reaction Force on standby in Tripoli to deploy if needed. That team did arrive in Benghazi on the night of the attack, but not until hours after the assault began.
There were five Diplomatic Security agents present at the compound in Benghazi on the night of the attack, the State Department says. Three of those agents were injured and survived, and it still isn't clear how or why they became separated from Stevens.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- S. Korea: N. Korea launches short-range missiles
- U.K. police announce new leads in missing girl case
- Photos of the Week 21 Photos
- Plane catches fire landing in Moscow
- Plane catches fire on Moscow runway Play Video
- Drone technology myths, facts and future feats
- Dramatic video appears to show 747 crash in Afghanistan
- Russia strikes back after expelling alleged U.S. spy
I too have questions? Like, if Stevens was really as fearful as some think, why was he still out running every morning as was his custom? And why didn't he get out of there or at the very least, go to the Embassy in Libya rather than remaining at the Consultant that had very little protection. Who were the 11 Libyans killed that night ? Were they guarding the consultant? And where was the Libyan Government. I DO NOT KNOW and NEITHER DO YOU.
Notice that the Obama Administration said that 'leaking news of Brennan's visit created a considerable security risk' - um, hey Obama - WHAT ABOUT PULLING THE EMBASSY SECURITY DETAIL IN AUGUST DESPITE MUTLIPLE TERRORIST ATTACKS IN THE AREA AND REQUESTS BY AMBASSADOR STEVENS FOR MORE SECURITY???
Don't get up in anyone's grill about 'considerable security risks'...your lame Administration got American's killed.
Secondarily, it might also be nice to know why members of this administration still can't seem to get their stories straight about it.
Tomorrow's hearing in Congress will finish Susan Rice for sure, and hopefully will spill over and knock Clinton silly as well.
BTW, our government still has not came out and talked to the American people about this attack, if this would have been ANY OTHER administration we would have had a prime time speach by now! Crickets from our President!!