House panel: State Dept. confirmed Libya threats
Updated 6:30 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON A House committee says a State Department officer told panel members there were 13 threats made against the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya during the six months before the Sept. 11 attack on the facility.
The assault left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
The panel adds that the officer told it the U.S. mission had made repeated requests for increased security.
A spokesman for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which is holding a hearing on the controversy next week, says its source is Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom, who was stationed in Libya from September 2011 to June 2012.
According to the panel, Nordstrom has already given a private briefing to members and will be called to testify at the session next Wednesday.
Separately, The Washington Post says one of its reporters found "sensitive documents" that were "only loosely secured" in the burned-out remains of the consulate Wednesday. The newspaper says the discovery "further complicates efforts by the Obama administration to respond to what has rapidly become a major foreign-policy issue just weeks before the election."
The oversight committee has also requested testimony from a second State Department official, Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Programs Charlene Lamb, who is involved in reviewing security requests.
Republicans have accused the Obama administration of being unprepared for the terrorist attack by Muslim extremists on the consulate, then allegedly issuing misinformation about it.
Initially, U.S. United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice suggested the attack was spontaneous, sparked by an anti-Islam video on the Web.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said she's committed to finding out exactly what happened leading up to the assault and whether security requests were made but denied.
"No one wants the answers more than we do here at the (State) Department," Clinton said. It has appointed a review board to investigate the controversy.
A letter to Clinton from the committee chairman, Darrell Issa (R, Calif.) and panel member Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R, Utah) had said the information came from "individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya."
Popular on CBSNews.com
-
One year after Afghan massacre, villagers work with U.S. troops One year after U.S. Staff Sgt. Robert Bales was accused of slaughtering 16 Afghan civilians, the villagers in the town where the atrocity took place have joined the U.S. special forces stationed there to assist in the fight against the Taliban.
- 50th Paris Air Show 13 Photos
- Basement living in China 6 Photos
- Italy top court cites "erotic game" hypothesis in Knox case
- Widespread protests in Brazil 23 Photos
- Torrential rain devastates Northern India 15 Photos
- 100,000 line streets of Brazil to protest corruption
- Hungary indicts 98-year-old for Nazi war crimes
- Egypt and Ethiopia try to roll back threats of war
The major complaint now is he is responsible if he spends too much money; especially more than congress authorizes and appropriates. Some say he spends too much money even if he stays within the limits approved by congress, and in some cases when he does not expend exactly what congress says.
The executive branch is at a minimum responsible for misuse of money or mismanagement, which is usually determined and pounced upon in hindsight by those also somewhat culpable.
Romney and the GOP have invented an imaginary Obama, similar to the one sitting in Clint Eastwood's chair - a "foreign born socialist who hates America". So, Romney has crafted his campaign to run against this imaginary Obama.
But the real Obama isn't the "foreign born socialist who hates America" that the right created. Obama is a left of center politician who has been below average in economy, average in domestic matters and above average in foreign policy. Not unlike any number of politicians in the last fifty years - an average president. If Romney recognized and ran against this Obama, he might have a chance.
But Romney and the GOP continue to run against their imaginary Obama, continuing to dwell on the ridiculous and, if its not ridiculous enough, they alter or take the mundane out of context to make it ridiculous. They, in effect, are trying to make Obama into what they want him to be, not what he actually is.
It is one thing to create a fantasy. Its another to actually start believing it and run a political campaign around it.
No one that loves this guy in our White House wants to open their eyes and see clearly what is going on. And they hated Bush?