CBS/AP/ September 30, 2012, 5:53 PM

NATO, Afghanistan assure strong relations after attack

KABUL, Afghanistan The deputy commander of NATO's military force in Afghanistan said on Sunday that incidents such as the fighting in Wardak province that killed two Americans and three Afghan soldiers would not weaken the strong relations between international and local forces.

British Lieutenant General Adrian Bradshaw, of NATO's International Security Assistance Force or ISAF, called a last-minute news conference in Kabul to address the incident, even though he had few details to give.

He said the initial report of an insider attack should be amended to note that the incident "is now understood possibly to have involved insurgent fire," and tried to stress that relations between international troops and their Afghan allies "are very strong and they're very effective."

The fighting started on Saturday when what is believed to have been a mortar fired by insurgents struck a checkpoint set up by US forces in Wardak, a provincial government spokesman said.

The spokesman said the Americans thought they were under attack from a nearby Afghan army checkpoint and fired on it, prompting the Afghan soldiers to return fire.

The Afghan Defense Ministry said the gun battle was the result of a "misunderstanding" between international forces and Afghan soldiers manning a checkpoint in the Sayd Abad district.

While it may be days before it becomes clear who fired on whom first, the incident illustrates how tense relations have become between international troops and their Afghan allies.

Officials on both sides went into damage control mode, arguing that Saturday's violence did not mark a new low in Afghan-US relations and urging patience while investigators tried to figure out exactly what had happened.

The toll has climbed steadily in recent months with a spate of attacks by Afghan army and police against American and NATO troops, and questions about whether allied countries will achieve their aim of helping the Afghan government and its forces stand on their own after most foreign troops depart in little more than two years.

Attacks by Afghan soldiers or police - or insurgents disguised in their uniforms - have killed 52 American and other NATO troops so far this year.

The so-called insider attacks are considered one of the most serious threats to the U.S. exit strategy from the country. In its latest incarnation that strategy has focused on training Afghan forces to take over security nationwide - allowing most foreign troops to go home by the end of 2014.

Although Obama has pledged that most U.S. combat troops will leave by the end of 2014, American, NATO and allied troops are still dying in Afghanistan at a rate of one a day.

Even with 33,000 American troops back home, the U.S.-led coalition will still have 108,000 troops - including 68,000 from the U.S. - fighting in Afghanistan at the end of this year. Many of those will be training the Afghan National Security Forces that are to replace them.

"There is a challenge for the administration," O'Hanlon said, "to remind people in the face of such bad news why this campaign requires more perseverance."

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
8 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MonkeyTree1 says:
A VOTE FOR OBAMA IS A VOTE FOR DEMOCIDE

OBAMA AND HOLDER GAVE US GUNS TO DRUG DEALERS
AND TERRORISTS - CREATING TERRORISM THROUGHOUT THE AMERICAS

WITH EVERY SHOOTING WE MUST HOLD OBAMA AND HOLDER RESPONSIBLE FOR
PROVIDING THE GUNS - - unless we have proof to the contrary.

Obama and Holder are responsible for thousands of murders in the US and Mexico.

HOW MANY MURDERS IS OBAMA RESPONSIBLE FOR TODAY.

VOTE FOR ROMNEY - THE ANTI-OBAMA
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MonkeyTree1 says:
OBAMA IS established himself as a weak incompetent idiot by the world. Thus, there will be riots because there is no leadership coming from the White House.

Obama is just to Stupid to be president - vote the fool out.

Vote for Romney
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Feeduptoo says:
This is the height of ignorance and bull s#*t. Relations remain strong my butt. Easy for him to say when he's so far away from incidents like this that they might as well be myths. This is NOT combat; it's murder. And it's the murder of our kids who have little chance to even defend themselves. With a death toll approaching that of 9/11, why isn't there as much outrage about this as there was then?
Bring our troops home NOW. Replace them with all the hawks in Congress and the industrial/military complex and their kids if they are so keen on these "strong relations".
How easy to send our kids in harms way when those who do it have nothing to lose and lot's of money to gain. Worse then them are all the rest of of us who sit by and allow it happen, to our shame.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Calltwoarms says:
How can our troops be so slow to figure out a counter to these insider attacks? Why are our troops still within small arms fire distance of the threat? Do our Generals sleep 24/7 or are they just plain stupid? Or both!? Since when do the best trained soldiers on Earth get bush-whacked by cavemen wearing uniforms?

I certainly hope the American tax payer can get continued financial aid put on a referendum so the real people that foot the bill won't have to pay for these traitors to eat, sleep and raise their little terrorists.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
crisjcesar says:
what else are they going to say? that the millions killed on both sides is for the better of us all? why don't politicians NATO and Afghans go screw themselves.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
one4gipper says:
I would trust an Afghani muslim, so long as I had my M-4 trained on him -- with the safety off!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
beancube2010 says:
Who are still paying for this expensive war contract?
It is us, the Americans, only.
War contractors are still getting pays for their industry monopoly.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
robert1129 says:
None of these bigwigs can assure anyone regarding these incidents. None of the Afghan security forces requested permission to shoot our guys and if one of them look cross eyed at our guys, that Afghan is dead on the spot. This will continue until the last American troops leaves Afghan. Anybody saying different just does not know what he is talking about.
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right