AP/ September 21, 2012, 12:41 AM

Last of U.S. surge troops out of Afghanistan

U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

U.S. troops in Afghanistan. / JANGIR

Updated 12:30 a.m. Friday, Sept. 21, 2012

(AP) AUCKLAND, New Zealand — Nearly two years after President Barack Obama ordered 33,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan to tamp down the escalating Taliban violence, the last of those surge troops have left the country, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Friday.

Panetta said the "surge did accomplish it objectives of reversing the Taliban momentum on the battlefield and dramatically increase the size and capability of the Afghan national security forces."

Calling it a "very important milestone," Panetta said he believes the U.S. is on track to accomplish its goals in Afghanistan.

Panetta said the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Allen, "is saying that the force he has put in place is sufficient to accomplish that mission."

The withdrawal, which leaves 68,000 American forces in the war zone, comes as the security transition to Afghan forces is in trouble, threatened by a spike in so-called insider attacks in which Afghan Army and police troops, or insurgents dressed in their uniforms, have been attacking and killing U.S. and NATO forces.

Afghan president urges peace, despite attacks
NATO: Afghan drawdown unaffected by ops change

And it's called into question the core strategy that relies on NATO troops working shoulder to shoulder with Afghans, training them to take over the security of their own country so the U.S. and its allies can leave at the end of 2014 as planned.

The number of U.S. forces there peaked at about 101,000 last year, and they have been coming out slowly over the past several months.

The surge was aimed at beating back the Taliban to give the Afghan government and its security forces the time and space to take hold. The key goal was to ensure that the Taliban did not regain a foothold in the country that could allow it once again to become a safe haven for terror groups. And there was hope that Taliban members would be willing to come to the peace table.

Military commanders say they have made broad gains against the Taliban, wresting control of areas where the insurgents once had strong footholds. And Panetta has characterized the insider attacks as the last gasp of a desperate insurgency.

But other top military leaders, including U.S. Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are worried about the impact of the attacks on the troops. Dempsey called them a "very serious threat" to the war campaign and has declared that "something has to change."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
20 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DOGGYPANTS says:
Since Obama took office, US Deaths have nearly doubled, but thisi nformation is not being reported, like when Bush was President. Apparently, the media has used the deaths of American Soldiers as a poltical weapon against Republicans.
reply
JediWoman58 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Apparently you have forgotten how we landed there to begin with. The Neocons had an agenda and they used 9/11 to put us there. Obama was handed this mess. He didn't use lies and subterfuge to get us to attack Iraq. Nor did he send our troops to Afghanistan. By the time he came in there was a big mess that he was left to clean up. If you want to play mouth piece for the Republicans, try Fox News.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
no1blonde says:
Well, at least they will be rested for the boots on the ground in Syria philosphy Mr. Romney seems to be charting a course for. Why oh why do they want to put our young people in harm's way for lack of diplomacy and keeping funds at home?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stevex47 says:
Thank you President Obama of keeping another promise and fixing yet another birther catastrophe.

US soldiers lives saved again because of Obama.

Why do birthers love to start wars?
reply
quincytodd replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Actually steve, we never had any right whatsoever to be in Afghanistan any more than the Russians did some 30 years ago. The only true difference is that while the Russians were motivated by their ideology, we're motivated by our desire to exploit Afghanistan's natural resources!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
STBY21 says:
More troops are leaving for Afghanistan today. Heading over for a 9 month deployment. Some have deployed 4 times in the past 6 years. Bring them home and rest them up. The world is about to be lit on fire with uprisings.

The middle east protests are just the shark bump to see our reaction. China and Russia will amp up their agression as well. They are guaging our response.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
The US should have pulled ALL of our troops out of Afghanistan.

Obama LOVES to leave Americans in harm's way, just as he did with our ambassador in Libya!
reply
quincytodd replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
How true that rings, tsigili. Thank you.
JediWoman58 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"Obama LOVES to leave Americans in harm's way, just as he did with our ambassador in Libya!" That statement demonstrates how little you understand about world history, war, and politics. Stop listening to Limbaugh and get a clue.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SummersideKate says:
Saigon, 1975.
reply
xJohnPx replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"Saigon, 1975"
Yes a great victory for US taxpayers. The only country we have been to war with the last 120 years where we do not have to support a miliatary base.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
zibulki says:
Those barbarians over there in the Middle East are un-trainable.
They only know how to jump around in the dirt, wave their arms, and scream like a goat. The other people over there are cowards for letting those animals ruin their countries.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
UForgotPoland says:
Quick! Let them all out before Mittens gets elected and forces them to stay there forever.
reply
JediWoman58 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Mittens will have us in Iran, too. Is that any better?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
36mike says:
General Dempsey says "something has to change" alright. How about the present Obama administration which seems to handle everything with kid gloves? Bring our men and women home for Christmas..last man out turn out the lights!
reply
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Obama Bush Obama Bush how can you not see the con?
jgnv replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amen! The sooner, the better.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Fareed17 says:
Like the Iraqi's the shaky Afghanistan leadership want American presence for their protection. These countries have to stand on their own. We are done with both. We will maintain a small presence going forward, nothing more.
reply
Solarrays247 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We should never have invaded either country in the first place. Osama bin Laden was taken out by a small contigent. Imagine how many lives could have been saved over the past eleven years?
See all 20 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right