Activists: U.S. used waterboarding more than it admits

CBS
(AP) CAIRO Human Rights Watch says it has uncovered evidence of a wider use of waterboarding in American interrogations of detainees than has been acknowledged by the United States.
The group's report details further brutal treatment at secret CIA-run prisons under the Bush administration-era U.S. program of detention and rendition of terror suspects.
The report also includes information about Washington's close cooperation with the regime of Libya's former dictator Muammar Qaddafi in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
The U.S. handed over to Libya the Islamist opponents of Qaddafi who it detained abroad with only thin "diplomatic assurances" that they would not be mistreated. Human Rights Watch says several of them were subsequently tortured in prison.
The report comes days after the Justice Department announced it would not bring criminal charges against any CIA personnel over severe interrogation methods used in the detention and rendition program.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack 81 Comments
- N. Korea sends top envoy to China as tensions mount
- Mexican volcano on verge of eruption 15 Photos
- People cling to car in "sidewalk skiing" stunt Play Video
- 12 years post-Taliban, Afghan women's rights under fire
- Costa Concordia captain ordered to stand trial
- Visitors evacuate after suicide at Paris' Notre Dame Cathedral
- Graphic video: knife-wielding suspect talks to camera Play Video















Think for a minute. If you're the commander on the scene and you've captured a suspected Al Qaeda safe house, are you going to let people go just because the owner of the house claims he didn't know the lodger was a terrorist? No, of course not. But most of the people who might be in posession of useful information are people who *also* may be completely innocent - the janitor *might* be planning to kill all the Americans he can, or he might be planning nothing more nefarious than the theft of Zarqawi's silverware. Does the fact that the janitor says he knows nothing useful mean that he's innocent, or that he's a terrorist protecting his allies?