Russian female punk band Pussy Riot gets 2 years for hooliganism over Putin protest at church site
Updated at 1:56 p.m. ET
(CBS/AP) MOSCOW - A Moscow judge sentenced three members of the provocative punk band Pussy Riot to two years in prison on hooliganism charges on Friday following a trial seen around the world as an emblem of Russia's intolerance of dissent.
The trial inspired a wave of small but raucous protests across Europe and North America in support of the feminist rockers, who have been dubbed prisoners of conscience by Amnesty International. Hundreds of Pussy Riot supporters waiting outside the Moscow courtroom chanted "down with the police state" when the sentence was announced. Dozens were detained, including several opposition leaders.
The three women were arrested in March after a February guerrilla performance in Moscow's main cathedral where they high-kicked and danced while singing a "punk prayer" pleading with the Virgin Mary to save Russia from Vladimir Putin, who was elected to a third term as Russia's president two weeks later.
Judge Marina Syrova said in her verdict that the band members "committed hooliganism driven by religious hatred." She rejected the women's arguments that they were protesting the Orthodox Church's support for Putin and didn't intend to offend religious believers.
Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, Maria Alekhina, 24, and Yekaterina Samutsevich, 30, stood in handcuffs in a glass cage in the courtroom for three hours as the judge read the verdict. They smiled sadly as the judge recounted testimony of prosecution witnesses accusing them of sacrilege and "devilish dances" in church.
Tolokonnikova laughed out loud when the judge read the testimony of a psychologist who said that her "active stance on social issues" was an anomaly.
The three women remained calm and kept smiling after the judge announced the sentence. Someone in the courtroom shouted "Shame!" They waved at relatives from behind the glass.
Samutsevich's father said he met with his daughter before the court session and she was prepared for a prison sentence. "We tried to comfort her," said Stanislav Samutsevich.
The charges carried a maximum penalty of seven years in prison, although prosecutors had asked for a three-year sentence.
When they called the band Pussy Riot and began performing in-your-face protest-punk, they knew they'd draw some attention, CBS News correspondent Charlie D'Agata reports. That was the point.
But when they chose the most sacred site in the Russian Orthodox Church to bang out a flash protest song against Putin, Russian authorities decided it was time for a crackdown.
"We accept our ethical misdemeanor, but an ethical misdemeanor should not be a cause of criminal punishment," Tolokonnikova said through a translator before the verdict.
Paul McCartney sends support to Russian punk band
Support grows for jailed Russian punk trio
Russian prosecutors ask for 3 years in punk case
D'Agata reports the band's cause was taken up by artists and musicians around the globe who saw the case as part of Putin's wider attempts to crush the protest movement and free speech, including the Red Hot Chili Peppers and Paul McCartney, who posted a message to Twitter Thursday saying:
"I hope you can stay strong and believe that I and many others like me who believe in free speech will do everything in our power to support you and the idea of artistic freedom."
Madonna recently performed with the name of the band on her back.
"They have done something courageous," she said. "I think they have paid the price for this act, and I pray for their freedom."
The remaining members of the band had said that, whatever the outcome, women in Russia and beyond should grab a facemask, gather together and cause a riot of their own in support.
Putin himself had said the band members shouldn't be judged too harshly, creating expectations that they could be sentenced to time served and freed in the courtroom. This, however, would have left the impression that Putin had bowed to public pressure, something he has resisted throughout his 12 years in power.
"Putin has doomed himself to another year and a half of international shame and humiliation," said Boris Akunin, one of Russia's most popular authors, who was among the Pussy Riot supporters outside the courthouse. "The whole thing is bad because it's yet another step toward the escalation of tensions within society. And the government is absolutely to blame."
Defense lawyers said they would appeal the verdict, although they had little hope that it would be overturned. "Under no circumstances will the girls ask for a pardon (from Putin)," said Mark Feygin. "They will not beg and humiliate themselves before such a bastard."
Outside the court, police rounded up a few dozen protesters, including former world chess champion Garry Kasparov, who is a leading opposition activist, and leftist opposition group leader Sergei Udaltsov.
When a prison bus drove the three women away, hundreds of supporters cheered their support.
Amnesty International strongly condemned the court's ruling, saying it "shows that the Russian authorities will stop at no end to suppress dissent and stifle civil society." Western governments criticized the sentence, with the U.S. State Department and German Chancellor Angela Merkel calling it disproportionately harsh.
"We urge Russian authorities to review this case and ensure that the right to freedom of expression is upheld," State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said in a statement.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said, "The United States is disappointed by the verdict, including the disproportionate sentences that were granted."
Russian female punk band on trial
- no previous page
- next
1/2
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Iran hangs alleged U.S., Israeli spies
- Photos of the Week 21 Photos
- North Korea fires short-range missiles for second day
- Two imprisoned over killing Malcolm X's grandson
- Afghanistan to ask India for military aid
- Assad: Syria transition talks are internal matter
- Russia strikes back after expelling alleged U.S. spy
- Plane catches fire on Moscow runway Play Video
praising and protecting degenerate hooligans of ***** Riot. This is no
accident. I suggest you read these articles on west's obsession with
***** Riot.
Western media concealing facts about female punk band's desecration of Russian cathedral http://******/Pc9fcJ
It's A Culture War, Stupid | Why is west obsessed with ***** Riot or what is Putin Derangement Syndrome http://******/NoIUTV
praising and protecting degenerate hooligans of ***** Riot. This is no
accident. I suggest you read these articles on west's obsession with
***** Riot.
Western media concealing facts about female punk band's desecration of Russian cathedral http://******/Pc9fcJ
It's A Culture War, Stupid | Why is west obsessed with ***** Riot or what is Putin Derangement Syndrome http://******/NoIUTV
Even if I buy your argument it's clear that the "crime" doesn't fit the time.
***
By the way, it's not an argument. It's a fact. Even *you* have the right to deny someone access to your property, regardless what message they might wish to enter and present to you.
"Come back and post your account of what happens next."
I can guarantee that whatever happens it WON'T be a 2 year prison sentence and you know it very well. You just proved the point that what happened to the band members would never happen in any democratic country with anything resembling human rights.
***
It is annoying yet amusing when idiots try the "...you just proved..." argument, largely demonstrating the parasitic nature of their own thinking. I "proved" nothing that supports your contention. Rather, I stated that it's a jurisdictional matter. In some (U.S.) jurisdictions, you'd get a ticket, in others; you'd be arrested.
Now the penalty is another matter. I know of at least two states that will consider trespassing a felony if the defendant has several trespassing convictions already or if there are other enhancing facts -- such as considerable property damage.
In one of those jurisdictions, Texas, you'd be facing two-to-ten for felony trespassing. I'm not sure what the other (Arizona, I believe) offers in the way of penalties. Now you can disparage either of those states to your heart's delight, but they each still belong to the U. S. and thus fall under your label of "democratic country."
Now, as for the time not fitting the crime, I tend to agree. As far as I've read thus far, the ladies in question did no property damage -- just trespassed. But then, whether or not you or I agree with a sentence is irrelevant, now isn't it?
There are some churches in the U. S. that support Obama; others that support Romney. Pick one, doesn't matter which. Next, go inside and start bad-mouthing their favorite candidate. When they tell you to knock it off and leave -- refuse.
Come back and post your account of what happens next.
That void seems to contain quite a few absolutes.