AP/ August 16, 2012, 1:55 PM

Julian Assange granted political asylum in Ecuador

Julian Assange, the founder of the WikiLeaks whistleblowing website, leaves the Supreme Court Feb. 2, 2012, in London.

Julian Assange, the founder of the WikiLeaks whistleblowing website, leaves the Supreme Court Feb. 2, 2012, in London. / Getty Images

Updated at 1:55 p.m. ET

(AP) LONDON - He's won asylum in Ecuador, but Julian Assange is no closer to getting there.

The dramatic decision by the Latin American nation to identify the WikiLeaks founder as a political refugee is a symbolic boost for the embattled ex-hacker, but legal experts say that does little to help him avoid extradition to Sweden — and does much to drag Britain and Ecuador into an international faceoff.

"We're at something of an impasse," lawyer Rebecca Niblock said shortly after the news broke. "It's not a question of law anymore. It's a question of politics and diplomacy."

Special Section: WikiLeaks
U.K.: WikiLeaks' Assange won't be allowed to leave
Ecuador official: U.K. made threat over Assange

The silver-haired Australian shot to international prominence in 2010 after he began publishing a huge trove of American diplomatic and military secrets — including a quarter million U.S. embassy cables that shed a harsh light on the backroom dealings of U.S. diplomats. Amid the ferment, two Swedish women accused him of sexual assault; Assange has been fighting extradition to Sweden ever since.

The convoluted saga took its latest twist on Thursday, when Ecuadorean Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino announced that he had granted political asylum to Assange, who has been holed up at the small, coastal nation's embassy since June 19. He said Ecuador was taking action because Assange faces a serious threat of unjust prosecution at the hands of U.S. officials.

That was a nod to the fears expressed by Assange and others that the Swedish sex case is merely the opening gambit in a Washington-orchestrated plot to make him stand trial in the United States — something disputed by both by Swedish authorities and the women involved.

Patino said he'd tried to get guarantees from the Americans, the British, and the Swedes that Assange would not be extradited to the United States, but that all three had rebuffed him. If Assange were extradited to the U.S. "he would not have a fair trial, could be judged by special or military courts, and it's not implausible that cruel and degrading treatment could be applied, that he could be condemned to life in prison, or the death penalty."

Patino's decision was warmly received by Assange, who in a statement praised Ecuador's "courage."

Pro-Assange demonstrators gathered outside the Edwardian-era embassy building, just down the street from the famous Harrods department store, and broke out into cheers when the news filtered out onto the street.

"It must have been a tough decision for Ecuador because they had pressure," said Alejandra Cazas, an 18-year-old British-Bolivian citizen just outside the embassy. "Now they have to watch out that he arrives to Ecuador safely."

But British Foreign Secretary William Hague said Britain will not allow Assange safe passage to Latin America.

"There is no legal basis for us to do so," he said.

He said Assange was wanted in Sweden to answer allegations of "serious sexual offenses" and that the extradition had nothing to do with the work of WikiLeaks or with the United States.

The diplomatic repercussions continued Thursday with an unlikely confrontation between Sweden and Ecuador.

In a mark of its anger over the asylum ruling, the Swedish Foreign Ministry said it had summoned Ecuador's ambassador to complain about the decision. The country's foreign minister, Carl Bildt, said in a message posted to Twitter that "our firm legal and constitutional system guarantees the rights of each and every one. We firmly reject any accusations to the contrary."

Ecuador's President Rafael Correa did not seem to be any mood for compromise either, posting a tweet which read: "No one is going to frighten us."

The issue already seems to have frayed diplomatic ties between the U.K. and Ecuador. Britain's previous ambassador to Ecuador, Linda Cross, departed earlier this year and had been due to be replaced this month by Patrick Mullee. But his arrival has been delayed.

They could fray further if Britain's decides to enforce a little-known 1987 law that gives the U.K. the right to enter the embassy to arrest Assange — a development most legal experts called unlikely and potentially dangerous.

The inviolability of embassies "is a fundamental premise of international law," said Niblock, who practices at London law firm Kingsley Napley.

If Britain carried through with the move, "it would threaten their embassy premises around the world."

Meanwhile, legal experts and diplomatic historians were abuzz with various unlikely scenarios for Assange's escape from Britain — perhaps hidden in a diplomatic car or smuggled in an oversized diplomatic bag.

Niblock said she foresees a lengthy stay at the Ecuadorean Embassy for the famous secret-spiller, and Hague, the British foreign minister, appeared to echo her prediction.

"This could go on for quite a considerable time as things stand," he told reporters. "There is no time limit for resolving this."

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
16 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ZxdpNQrVbdfg says:
Love your enemies...including Julian if he is that...and 'thou shalt not kill'.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kwarrant says:
I fully support Mr. Assange. NO government reserves any right to with-hold information. "Assange shot to prominence after WikiLeaks repeatedly released huge troves of U.S. secret documents, moves which have outraged Americans and led to calls from American politicians to have him hunted down like a terrorist." ...I am an American, and I am not outraged because I believe in accountability and within the U.S. regime there is none. Good job to Ecuador, it was the right thing. The U.S. Gov. is so far out of control it's scary. With talks about 30K drones over U.S. skies, all the laws, talk and preparations this Gov. is taking against the people. Everyone is a "terrorist" by their stupid definition. So be it, i'm an American, born raised and I love my country and it will be one cold day in hell before I let the real terrorist (the U.S. Gov.) hamper my freedoms and liberty. THEY are the TERRORISTS.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NB62 says:
This piece of human waste should be in a prison cell for the rest of his life.Better yet a few bullets to the head will even be a better solution for this tratior and gutless coward
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
josephp5 says:
Something is very wrong about the way Assange was being pursued by Britain, Sweeden, and the United States. He has not been charged with any crime in any country. Yet Britain (with the encouragement of the U.S.) was forcing him to be "extradited" to Sweeden---not to be charged for any crime, but merely for "questioning" in a rape case completely unrelated to Wikileaks (and even the victim of the alleged rape has stated publicly that Assange is being railroaded). Since when do countries forcibly extradite people merely to be questioned for an alleged crime? It really seems obvious that the government wants to get him out of sight, or at least discredit him, without actually having to to any of those messy Constitutional things like arresting him, charging him with a crime, presenting evidence against him, and convicting him. It's sad that a country like Ecuador has to step in in order to protect someone from his rights being abused from countries like the U.S. and Britain, where supposedly the rule of law is supreme.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
emaracin says:
I have a thought, if the UK uses Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act of 1987 then Ecuador should revoke the UK Embassy in their country.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
emaracin says:
I have a thought, if the UK uses Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act of 1987 then Ecuador should revoke the UK Embassy in their country. Let the chips fall where they may. People of the US owe Assange a debt of gratitude for exposing the corruption of our country. I support Assange and what he's doing.It sickens me that the US thru the UK and Sweden are trying to get their hands on Assange to probably torture and kill him or lock him up forever. Ecuador is doing the RIGHT thing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wardove says:
thank you Julian, they also say i cant leave the usa , i dont get it this world.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
damnedreligion says:
EQUADORIAN PRESIDENT CORREA ALIGNED WITH:

Chavez of Venezuela
Castro of Cuba
Ahmadinejad of Iran
Assad of Syria
Hezbolla of Lebanon
and a host of other enemies of America and The West.

In addition to the above-mentioned, Correa, Ahmadinejad and Chavez, advocate uniting a military confederation to invade and destroy The United States.

Julain Assange has committed a large number of 'secrecy violations', against many countries, and has in fact endangered many American diplomats, soldiers, and others, by his 'Wiki leaking activities', and believes he has done so for 'righteous purpose'.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
norulers says:
Viva, Ecuador! Viva Ecuador! Viva, Ecuador!
F- the US/UK! F- the US/UK! F-the US/UK!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
88Ronin says:
WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES and PEOPLE OF THE WORLD
wish to thank Julian Assange and ECUADOR for doing the right thing!
reply
See all 16 Comments