AP/ August 1, 2012, 9:33 AM

Israel unconvinced as U.S. urges patience on Iran

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, listens as U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks during a meeting at the prime minister's office in Jerusalem Aug. 1, 2012.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, listens as U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks during a meeting at the prime minister's office in Jerusalem Aug. 1, 2012. / AP Photo

Updated at 2:11 a.m. ET

(AP) JERUSALEM - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, standing next to the U.S. defense chief, said Wednesday without qualification that international economic sanctions have had no effect on Iran's nuclear program and suggested Israeli patience was wearing thin, a statement that amounted to an indictment of President Barack Obama's policy toward the Islamic republic.

Netanyahu dismissed U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's assurances that the United States shared its goal of a non-nuclear Iran, saying the central features of Washington's strategy for stopping the Islamic republic's nuclear ambitions - sanctions and diplomacy - were perilously close to failure.

Netanyahu did not explicitly threaten to attack Iran, but that was the unspoken implication of his assertion that all non-military measures have proven ineffective in persuading Iran to change its course.

"Right now the Iranian regime believes that the international community does not have the will to stop its nuclear program," Netanyahu said. "This must change, and it must change quickly because time to resolve this issue peacefully is running out."

His message was particularly striking, given that he delivered it beside Panetta, who spent two days in Israel offering reassurances that the two allies shared the same goals on Iran.

"I want to reassert again the position of the United States that with regards to Iran, we will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. Period," the Pentagon chief said. "We will not allow them to develop a nuclear weapon. And we will exert all options in the effort to ensure that that does not happen."

Panetta argued that all non-military means of pressuring Iran must first be exhausted before military action is called for. He said repeatedly that Washington still considers military action an option for the future.

But Netanyahu was unyielding in his view that more must be done now. He said sanctions have hurt Iran's economy but not achieved their ultimate purpose, which is to change the calculus of Iran's rulers.

"Neither sanctions nor diplomacy has yet had any impact on Iran's nuclear weapons program," the Israeli leader said.

"America and Israel have also made clear that all options are on the table. You yourself said a few months ago that when all else fails, America will act," he said, referring to statements by Panetta. "But these declarations have also not yet convinced the Iranians to stop their program."

Iran asserts that its nuclear program is meant to produce civilian energy, not to make weapons. And it insists that it has a right under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich the uranium that can be used either to power civilian nuclear reactors or to build bombs.

Panetta's visit came on the heels of a stop here by Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, who has accused the Obama administration of doing too little to help Israel and too little to stop Iran.

In his joint appearance with Panetta at an air defense site in southern Israel, Defense Minister Ehud Barak sought to emphasize solidarity with the Obama administration, crediting Panetta and Obama for the "extraordinary" strength of the U.S.-Israeli defense relationship.

But he, like Netanyahu, parted ways with Washington by expressing doubts about the viability of the sanctions strategy.

Standing beside Panetta and flanked by American and Israeli flags, Barak said he sees an "extremely low" probability that international economic sanctions will cause the Iranian leaders to give up their nuclear ambitions.

"We have clearly something to lose" while the world waits for sanctions to have the desired effect, "because the Iranians are moving forward," Barak said.

Netanyahu's and Barak's statements, taken together, dramatized the growing strain in U.S.-Israeli relations.

The Obama administration has steadily ratcheted up the severity of economic sanctions on Iran, and on Monday Congress agreed on a new package of sanctions that expand financial penalties and further target Tehran's energy and shipping sectors. Iran angrily equated the moves to economic "warfare."

Some argue that tough economic sanctions are a blunt instrument of power that harms a wide swath of ordinary Iranians without punishing those whose political decisions are the target of the penalties.

The National Iranian American Council, which seeks to promote better relations between the two countries, denounced the latest sanctions.

"The bill imposes collective punishment on the Iranian people by seeking to destroy the Iranian economy," said the council's policy director, Jamal Abdi. "Meanwhile, Iranian regime officials do not suffer from lack of food or medicine and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps enjoys an increasing share of economic power under a sanctions economy."

Panetta highlighted a series of measures the Obama administration has taken recently to improve Israel's defenses. He noted that the U.S. has invested more than $200 million in an air defense system known as Iron Dome, which is designed to shoot down short-range rockets, mortars and artillery shells fired into northern Israel from southern Lebanon and into Israel's south from the Gaza Strip. An Iron Dome launcher formed the backdrop to Panetta's news conference with Barak near the city of Ashkelon, five miles north of Gaza.

Panetta also said the administration is working with the builder of the Air Force's next-generation F-35 fighter to include a special package of enhancements on the version that Israel intends to purchase.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
19 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eileenfleming says:
During my many interviews with Israel's Nuclear Whistle Blower, Mordechai Vanunu beginning in 2005 during my first of 7 trips to Israel Palestine, he told me what EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW:

"Did you know that President Kennedy tried to stop Israel from building atomic weapons? In 1963, he forced Prime Minister Ben Guirion to admit the Dimona was not a textile plant, as the sign outside proclaimed, but a nuclear plant. The Prime Minister said, 'The nuclear reactor is only for peace.'

"Kennedy insisted on an open internal inspection. He wrote letters demanding that Ben Guirion open up the Dimona for inspection. The French were responsible for the actual building of the Dimona. The Germans gave the money; they were feeling guilty for the Holocaust, and tried to pay their way out. Everything inside was written in French, when I was there, almost twenty years ago. Back then, the Dimona descended seven floors underground.

"In 1955, Perez and Guirion met with the French to agree they would get a nuclear reactor if they fought against Egypt to control the Sinai and Suez Canal. That was the war of 1956. Eisenhower demanded that Israel leave the Sinai, but the reactor plant deal continued on.



"When Johnson became president, he made an agreement with Israel that two senators would come every year to inspect. Before the senators would visit, the Israelis would build a wall to block the underground elevators and stairways. From 1963 to '69, the senators came, but they never knew about the wall that hid the rest of the Dimona from them. Nixon stopped the inspections and agreed to ignore the situation. As a result, Israel increased production. In 1986, there were over two hundred bombs. Today, they may have enough plutonium for ten bombs a year."-excerpted from "BEYOND NUCLEAR: Mordechai Vanunu's FREEDOM of SPEECH Trial and My Life as a Muckraker: 2005-2010" by Eileen Fleming

I am Eileen Fleming for US HOUSE, D. 5, Fl. and I approve of all of my messages.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lami987 says:
Netanyahu could't wait to see Romney got elected in November. Regardless of who get elected, we must not get involved in the war with Iran. If Israel want to fight let them do it but without any American involvement. Besides Israel's intelligence is not that good anyway. Bush was duped into believing Iraq's WMD partly because of Israel's intel. Israel contributed nothing in fighting the war just contributed a lot in creating the war.
reply
DovBenMen replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The yellowcake assertion and forged documents came from the Italians, as has been well documented. What was "Israel's intel" you allude to that played any role in the Bush '43 decision to invade Iraq?
eileenfleming replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Message to Mitt: Courtesy of CIA, FBI, Bibi's nephew, Israel's Nuclear Whistle Blower and This Candidate for US HOUSE @
http://wearewideawake.org/
linkicon reporticon emailicon
worldcitizen1 says:
Many US and Israeli citizens seem to be as easily persuaded into war as were the German people in the late 30's and early 40's.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GTR5 says:
We don't owe Israel anything. Not one American soldier needs to die supporting Israel's war. I'm fed up with being forced to pay for their support with my tax money.
reply
gmcgmc replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kkltr76, monies going to Egypt, Jordan, etc, are for having peace with Israel. In behalf of Israel, we also have to pay for allegiance by this other nations in M.E. Talk about a double edged sword. (Monies)
linkicon reporticon emailicon
UForgotPoland says:
Israel is blood hungry. It's been awhile since they've been in a major conflict and they have forgotten the harsh realities of war, they should go ahead and bomb Iran to learn the costs of something they've been chasing after for so long. They also shouldn't hide behind us, if they want a war we shouldn't have to fight it for them, if that's their strategy then they're nothing but cowards.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
superdem1 says:
Step back and look at this - a tiny nation of a few million - armed with many nuclear weapons - is threatening war against a hugh nation of many, many millions, with no nuclear weapons. Does this sound like a good idea to you ? What can be the United States' interest in this horrendous situation ? What can the world say about such a ridiculous development ? Iran has always been a regional power, remember the Persian Empire ? We are the ones backing the intruding power, the occupying power, the suppressing power. We are the ones who back the power that will not sign any international agreements. If Israel starts a war, there will be war within THIS country, because a great many Americans feel the support of a beligerant Israel is contrary to basic American values. Any time a tiny minority is dominating the huge majority, Democracy has been lost. And that is what we are supporting.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Nikos_Retsos says:
Netanyahu cannot claim to speak on behalf of the "international community." (Paragraph 3, this article) Surely Israel is irritated because it used to be a "superpower" in Middle East, but the military ascendance of Iran, and the top Iranian clout in the Muslim world has cut Israel's former superpower status in then region down to just another regional fella! Add to this equation Israel's cut off relations with Turkey; add the Arab Spring changes in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya that have been anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli oriented; add the constant protests in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia; add the uncertainty in Syria; add the upcoming U.S. busting in Afghanistan and a more hostile day-by-day Pakistan, and the Israelis have started to feel lost in a dark and hostile regional Muslim forest!

Now Netanyahu tries desperately to keep the remnants of the prior Israeli clout in Middle East afloat by bugging and begging the U.S. to bomb Iran. The Israelis hope that such an action will salvage their already half-sunk military prestige in the region by piggy-backing on the U.S. military power, and then make headlines with un- earned bragging rights from the operation!

There is no Iranian nuclear threat in Middle East or against any state anywhere. The whole Israeli brouhaha about the Iranian threat is emanating from the rise of Turkey and Iran as powerful anti-Israeli states in Middle East. Israel now feels sidelined, and it is trying to draw the U.S. into a war to reverse its lost political clout! Nikos Retsos, retired professor, Chicago
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
honest_pols says:
HELL ON EARTH GUARANTEED, IF WESTERN FREE WORLD FAILS TO PREVENT IRAN FROM
NUCLEAR WEAPONS' PROCUREMENT, POSSESSION, OR FROM ACHIEVING NUCLEAR
CAPABILITY

What some of us are forgetting, is the current Iranian regime's INTENTIONS!

It is no less than certain, that based on Iranian rulers' intentions and on their HOLY ISLAMIC DUTY, that that country's regime is NOT working in the good interests of Non-Islamic peoples and Non-Islamic nations of the world.

Our world would become FUBAR, and all people and all nations would suffer more misery, pain, suffering, and deaths than ever, if our Western World Leaders fail to stop the Religiofascist Iranian regime's Nuclear Weapons development program.

The current Iranian regime cannot be trusted with ANY Nuclear Weapons or ANY Nuclear Devices!

Research The Mahdi, and Iran's "Divinely-inspired Holy Islamic Duty" to precipitate Nuclear World War III, as required to pave the way for The Mahdi's or The Islamic Messiah's arrival.
reply
hsinco-2009 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Netanyahu IMO is not credible.

If fact, I'd say he is the equivalent to John Bolton.
worldcitizen1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Iran is not the worlds largest superpower, invading and occupying other nations in the name of 'freedom and democracy. The USIsrael promotes war for their 'interests, (profit) wherever necessary. WWIII might be a result of the Israeli promoted war. Your quotes are absurd.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dmnnumberone says:
Would you like to know what will help get Iran's (and all Nations in similar situations), attention? Drop the sanctions. Apologize and start with a team of diplomats.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gmcgmc says:
I think it's about time Israel provides FACTS of Iran developing nuclear weapons. Talk is cheap; actions speak louder than words Israel. PROVE IT I ask
reply
DovBenMen replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Here is but one item from just the first 3 days of just this week:

'The IISS said that Western experts who monitor Iran's compliance with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1929 of June 2010, which banned Tehran from developing nuclear-capable ballistic missiles, have reported that vital propellant ingredients are being seized before they reach Iran.

'These include "the interception in Singapore on Sept. 30, 2010, of 302 drums of pure aluminum powder destined for Iran from China," the IISS said. "The seized powder was suitable solely for solid-propellant production.

"Diplomatic cables made public by WikiLeaks provide additional evidence of Iran's worldwide search for propellant ingredients, including attempted acquisitions from India and China ..."

[ref. http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2012/07/20/Sanctions-slow-down-Iran-missile-program/UPI-16591342803443/]
gmcgmc replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DovBenMen, here is a quote in that article: "If true, and if future applications of sanctions prevent Iran from establishing a reliable source of propellant ingredients regulated by the Missile Technology Control Regime, the Islamic Republic will not be able to create missiles capable of threatening Western Europe, much less the United States, before the end of this decade." Whats your take on that?
See all 4 Replies
See all 19 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right