AP: U.S. weighs more direct involvement in Syria
A fighter from the Syrian opposition aims during clashes with forces loyal to President Bashar Assad in the center of Syria's restive northern city of Aleppo, Syria, July 25, 2012. / AFP/Getty Images
(AP) WASHINGTON - The Obama administration is weighing its options for more direct involvement in the Syrian civil war if the rebels opposing the Assad regime can wrest enough control to create a safe haven for themselves, U.S. officials told the Associated Press.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton says it's only a matter of time before the rebels have enough territory and organization to create such areas.
"More and more territory is being taken," Clinton said this week. "It will eventually result in a safe haven inside Syria, which will then provide a base for further actions by the opposition."
Despite the apparent gains by rebels, the Obama administration is warning of a possible massacre in the city of Aleppo.
State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland says the U.S. has "grave concerns" about tanks and fighter jets being used in a densely populated city.
She says thousands of people are spilling out of Aleppo and calls the onslaught a "desperate" attempt by a government losing control of its country.
Rebels who have been fighting for six days in Syria's commercial capital of 3 million people are bracing themselves amid reports the government is massing reinforcements to retake the city. They are reporting artillery strikes and strafing by attack helicopters and fighter jets.
Nuland said: "The concern is that we will see a massacre in Aleppo, and that's what the regime appears to be lining up for."
Officials are already starting to brainstorm how a safe zone might allow Washington to step up its assistance, which has been limited to humanitarian aid and nonlethal equipment such as medical supplies and communications gear.
A senior American official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the administration's thinking publicly, said the U.S. is seeing "increased unity, cohesion and better military performance" among the rebels, including greater effectiveness in coordinating attacks, which the administration sees as proof the rebels are better employing the encrypted radios supplied by the U.S.
Special Section: The Arab Spring
Syria opposition gathers; Aleppo in crosshairs
Syrian war draws gawking tourists to border
For now, U.S. officials are standing by their assertion that they won't provide arms to Syria's anti-Assad forces or push for a no-fly zone over rebel-controlled areas. With Syria's government fighting back forcefully against opposition offensives in Damascus, Aleppo and elsewhere, it's still unclear whether the rebels could create a secure staging ground for the rebellion.
The Libyan militia that chased from power and killed Muammar Qaddafi last year had set up the city of Benghazi as a safe haven, creating a central place to meet and strategize and an entry point for supplies from NATO and Arab countries. The U.S. set up a consulate.
The discussions on Syria come as the U.S. and its international partners look for a possibly game-changing shift in the country's bloody, 16-month conflict, which began with Syrian President Bashar Assad's brutal crackdown on protesters, followed by dissenters taking up arms against the government. More than 19,000 people have been killed, according to opposition activists, and despite increased cracks in the regime's military and political stability, there remains little to suggest an imminent end to the violence.
The establishment of a safe zone would settle one issue: the lack of an actual place inside Syria for other nations to engage with the opposition on the ground and deliver supplies into the heart of the conflict.
The U.S. would be able to shift Syria-watching officials they've deployed in places such as Jordan and Turkey into Syria. And governments such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar that have been providing weapons to the opposition would have a more direct pipeline for military assistance.
But officials cannot point to when the rebels might be able to carve out some autonomous space for themselves within Syria. The rebels remain heavily outgunned by Assad's better trained forces. And while they've been able to increase the breadth of their attacks across Syria, they've been constantly forced to cede back any temporary territorial gains they make.
Under the current circumstances, U.S. diplomatic efforts have been stymied. Russia and China have shielded the Assad regime from U.N. Security Council action three times, most recently last week. And U.S.-led efforts such as sanctions and a campaign of international isolation may have sapped Syria's government of funds, but not its resolve to crush what it regards as an armed insurgency.
In the last month, the Obama administration has spoken of the rebels' growing ability to challenge the Assad regime's military supremacy.
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor noted the pace of high-level regime defections was accelerating and that the U.S. and its partners were still advocating a political transition away from four decades of dictatorship under the Assad family dynasty. The sooner that happens, he said, "the greater the chance we have of averting a lengthy and bloody sectarian civil war and the better we'll be able to help Syrians manage a stable transition to democracy."
Clinton went a step further earlier this week, offering a battlefield picture that included Syria's ragtag alliance of militia beginning to take control of parts of the country.
She said the opposition should be preparing for how it will maintain order when it controls territory.
"They have to start working on interim governing entities. They have to commit to protecting the rights of all Syrians, every group of Syrians. They have to set up humanitarian response efforts that we can also support. They've got to safeguard the chemical and biological weapons that we know the Syrian regime has," she said.
The U.S. is also preparing, though it doesn't want to call its shots. And administration officials insist that it won't be the U.S. military that creates safe zones for the Syrian opposition — as proponents of intervention such as Republican Sen. John McCain have proposed.HEREHEREHERESince the Syrian conflict started, U.S. officials have repeatedly cited the lack of a safe zone in Syrian territory as one of several hindrances to more aggressive American assistance — from establishing a no-fly zone over parts of the country to providing weaponry to the opposition.
Other hurdles have included a lack of regional and international consensus, the opposition's disorganization and internal rivalries, the inability to get any U.N. mandate for action and a lingering sense that American or other foreign intervention might actually mean more lives lost than saved. American officials also say involvement could prompt greater instability in a powder-keg region.
The opposition has been essentially limited to hit-and-run attacks and unable to hold any major Syrian population centers. In addition, officials note that the Assad regime is unlikely to cede a city like Aleppo without the kind of fight the rebels are unable to win.
The likely result is that any territory the rebels are able to take, occupy and defend will be far from the Mediterranean coast and not well served by existing infrastructure like good roads, solid bridges, power and water. That would complicate the establishment of foreign consulates or liaison offices, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they said planning was at an early stage and they were not authorized to discuss it publicly.
Underscoring the value some see in the safe zones, more than 60 foreign policy experts and former U.S. government officials sent a letter to President Obama this week urging him to use U.S. air power immediately to patrol territory seized by the opposition. The mainly Republican group accused the president of "complicity in oppression" for failing to halt the bloodshed.
Popular on CBSNews.com
-
One year after Afghan massacre, villagers work with U.S. troops One year after U.S. Staff Sgt. Robert Bales was accused of slaughtering 16 Afghan civilians, the villagers in the town where the atrocity took place have joined the U.S. special forces stationed there to assist in the fight against the Taliban.
- 50th Paris Air Show 19 Photos
- Widespread protests in Brazil 23 Photos
- Celebration and devotion in India 14 Photos
- One of FBI's Ten Most Wanted nabbed in Mexico
- Afghan gov't halts talks with U.S. on security pact
- Somali militants wage deadly attack on U.N. office
- Torrential rain devastates Northern India 15 Photos
- Brazil protesters flood Sao Paulo streets for 2nd night
Read this arcticle (before it is removed)
salon(dot)com/2012/07/27/swallowing_the_syria_lie_salpart/
Pobably an exaggeration. Even if true its still a walk in the park compared to the death and destruction caused by the USA's invasion of Iraq.
"U.S. has "grave concerns" about tanks and fighter jets being used in a densely populated city."
What's the problen we used them in Iraq all the time. What a bunch of hypocrites.
Estimates range from a low of 100,000 to a high of one million hardly minimal.
If he is successful, then it will be just a matter of taking lighter held places one at a time; regaining what they walked away from.
Stability is what we should be aiming for. And that means quit fostering wars and rebellions all over the world. The govt's that we are trying to overthrow, if you leave them alone, they will not bother you. It is an Islamic law that they will only fight against those who fight against them. And you will never replace the religion of Islam with the religion of democracy. It must always come out as number one, even if it takes a century.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
You mean like the U.S.did in Iraq? Saddam was accused of the same things but no one mentioned that his generals were trained in the U.S. in torture and chemical warfare and that a great part of the chemicals he used against Iran and the Turks came from the U.S. Like the U.S. turned its back on Gaddafi after he had been called an "asset" by the CIA? Now the villain is Assad even though the Arab League presented evidence taht M16 and the CIA are behind the violence and no one can be sure how much of Assad's alleged crimes are nothing more than Washington propaganda.