CBS/AP/ July 17, 2012, 12:12 PM

India: No warning from U.S. ship in Gulf shooting

A small vessel that was fired upon by the U.S. Navy off Dubai's coast July 16, 2012, is inset in a picture of the replenishment oiler USNS Rappahannock sailing in the Pacific Ocean Oct. 4, 2011.

A small vessel that was fired upon by the U.S. Navy off Dubai's coast July 16, 2012, is inset in a picture of the replenishment oiler USNS Rappahannock sailing in the Pacific Ocean Oct. 4, 2011. / CBS/AP Photo/U.S. Navy

Updated at 3:17 p.m. ET

(CBS/AP) DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - An Indian fisherman aboard a boat shot at by the U.S. Navy off Dubai's coast has told officials the crew received no warning before being fired upon, India's ambassador to the United Arab Emirates said Tuesday.

The account differs from that provided by the Navy, which said it resorted to lethal force Monday only after issuing a series of warnings.

Pentagon spokesman George Little said that after al Qaeda's 2000 bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen a series of measures was put into place that all Navy ships take into account, CBS News reports. Little said the refueling ship USNS Rappahannock did issue warnings against what it saw as a potential threat and those warnings were not heeded.

One Indian was killed in the incident, and three of his countrymen were seriously wounded. The shooting underscored how quickly naval encounters can escalate in the increasingly tense waters of the Gulf.

U.S. ship fires on boat off Dubai coast; 1 dead

The shooting happened Monday afternoon when a boat rapidly approached the Rappahannock about 10 miles off Dubai's Jebel Ali port, according to the Navy.

The Navy said the boat's crew disregarded warnings from the U.S. vessel, and only then did gunners fire on it with a .50-caliber machine gun.

A description of the incident posted online by the U.S. military indicates that a security team aboard the Rappahannock began issuing warnings as the boat headed toward it from about 900 yards away. Gunners opened fire when the boat closed in to about 100 yards, according to the account.

The white-hulled, dark-bottomed boat appeared to be a civilian vessel powered by three outboard motors. It had no obvious military markings. The skiff was 50 feet long and carried no communications gear, according to the U.S. military description.

Similar boats are used for fishing in the region, though Iran's Revolutionary Guard also employs relatively small, fast-moving craft in the Gulf.

Indian consular officials have met with the wounded. Indian Ambassador M.K. Lokesh told The Associated Press on Tuesday that one of the survivors reported that the men were returning from fishing when they encountered the American ship.

"He says there was no warning" before the shooting occurred, Lokesh said, though he noted that authorities are still working to determine what happened. "We are waiting for the investigation to be complete."

Guest workers from India and other South Asian countries have flocked to the Gulf for decades in search of well-paying jobs. Many are employed as low-skilled workers in industries such as fishing and construction.

Dubai's police chief, Lt. Gen. Dahi Khalfan Tamim, said an initial investigation suggests "the boat was in its right course and did not pose any danger," according to comments published by Abu Dhabi-based daily The National. He told the government-backed newspaper that the shooting appeared to be a mistake.

Lokesh said the casualties are all from the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Four other men — two Indians and two Emiratis — were unhurt because they were in the boat's cabin, he said.

The three injured men are recovering in a Dubai hospital and are "out of danger," the Indian ambassador added. It was not immediately possible to reach the fishermen directly.

The U.S. ambassador to India, Nancy Powell, has expressed regret for the loss of life and assured Indian officials that the U.S. government will conduct a full investigation.

India has separately asked the United Arab Emirates to investigate the incident, Indian External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna said Tuesday.

Emirati and American officials both say they are investigating.

Lt. Greg Raelson, a spokesman for the Navy's Bahrain-based 5th Fleet, declined to say what types of warnings the Rappahannock's crew issued before opening fire, though he said they acted in line with standard procedures.

"U.S. ships have an inherent right to self-defense against potential threats. The U.S. crew repeatedly attempted to warn the vessel's operators to turn away from their deliberate approach," he said.

The Gulf federation, which includes the commercial hub of Dubai and the oil-rich capital Abu Dhabi, is a key American ally in the Gulf. American warships frequently visit Jebel Ali port, a popular rest stop among U.S. sailors.

Tensions are high in the Gulf after nearby Iran last week renewed threats to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz — the route for one-fifth of the world's oil — in retaliation for tighter sanctions over Iran's nuclear program.

In Tehran, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast used Monday's incident to challenge the U.S. over what he called a provocation in the Gulf, according to comments carried by the semi-official Fars news agency.

"The reason why we have repeatedly announced that the presence of foreign forces can threaten (the) security of the region is visible in the incidents that are happening," he said at his weekly news conference.

"Any move or policy which can somehow endanger the security of this region or the security of energy supplies can threaten the interests of the regional countries," he added.

The U.S. recently boosted its naval presence in the Gulf with additional minesweepers and other warships. The Pentagon said Monday it is sending another aircraft carrier to the Middle East several months early to ensure it has two carriers continuously in the region.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
33 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AnnieDanny says:
Well sure, it's best to CYA if you've caused an international incident. And if you can't CYA with anything but an outright lie, I suppose that'll have to do.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rafterman11 says:
My guess is that these fishermen weren't exactly the best seamen in the world and got too close to the ship. And of course, what's the survivor going to tell them, "yeah, we got too close to an armed warship because we're dumbazzes"?

Often, during encounters, video on the bridge is sometimes taken (like the Iran airline shootdown). I wonder if there is any video of this incident?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rejco100 says:
Add another brutally murder to the list of innocent people killed by the USA....
reply
IPonUall replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
All morons make me sick...
tigrissupinus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Henry J. Kaiser class

The Henry J. Kaiser-class is a class of fleet replenishment oilers for which construction began in August 1984. This class is composed of eighteen underway replenishment oilers which are operated by the Military Sealift Command to provide underway replenishment of fuel to Navy combat ships and jet fuel for aircraft and helicopters aboard aircraft carriers and surface warships. The Kaisers also have a limited capacity to supply ammunition, dry stores and refrigerated stores, although not as much as the AOEs and AORs; they do not have helicopter embarkation facilities. A Kaiser-class oiler operating in tandem with a Lewis & Clark-class AKE is considered to be the equivalent of one Supply-class AOE

Thats a lot of explosive potential,

The job of the security team on that ship is to prevent anything that could cause that ship to potentially go boom.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
You would have to have lived under a rock to think approaching a US naval vessel at high speed and ignoring warnings isn't going to get you in trouble.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sepa2 says:
Soon there will be an official heartfelt apology
reply
Rafterman11 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ah, yes, the right wing myth of the Obama apology.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thefatcat2 says:
1)..why did the India boat use an "attack" posture if it is a fishing boat.?
2)..If I was the U.S. Captain I would have had 1 or 2 people video
record all or most.
...Hmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AOCGUY says:
There is nothing in this article that explains why a "fishing boat" was approaching a US Warship. Hell, if I was a commerical tanker in those waters and a high speed boatappproached like that I would have openedas well.
reply
AOCGUY replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As I heard on a cop show last night "better to face a jury of twelve than carried by six"
linkicon reporticon emailicon
parisdakar says:
Give them a break, eh? They thought the warning shots were fireworks and came in for a better view.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
viksman says:
A lot of hateful comments here.
What goes around, comes around.

All empires come to an end and the decline of this one has started. Some humility will help as we go through the decline.
reply
JoeBGud13 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are wecome to move to another any time you want too, unlike the places you claim are better, we will not lock you up for wanting to leave.
Go ahead and get the Heck out of my country! the United States of America. Bravo Zula to the crew of the USNS tanker, well done.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
formerlyluvnut says:
Waaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh....MOMMEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boo hoo.
reply
See all 33 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right