AP/ July 7, 2012, 1:23 AM

U.S. declares Afghanistan major non-NATO ally

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, second from right, speaks as Afghan President Hamid Karzai, right, listens during a press conference at the Presidential Palace Saturday, July 7, 2012 in Kabul, Afghanistan. Clinton arrived earlier in the day on an unannounced visit to meet Karzai ahead of the Tokyo conference on Afghanistan's reconstruction.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, second from right, speaks as Afghan President Hamid Karzai, right, listens during a press conference at the Presidential Palace Saturday, July 7, 2012 in Kabul, Afghanistan. Clinton arrived earlier in the day on an unannounced visit to meet Karzai ahead of the Tokyo conference on Afghanistan's reconstruction. / Pool,AP Photo/Brendan Smialowski

Updated July 7, 2012, 1:13 AM ET

(CBS/AP) KABUL, Afghanistan - The Obama administration on Saturday declared Afghanistan the United States' newest "major non-NATO ally," an action designed to facilitate close defense cooperation after U.S. combat troops withdraw from the country in 2014 and as a political statement of support for Afghanistan's long-term stability.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced that President Barack Obama had designated Afghanistan as a major non-NATO ally shortly after arriving in the country for talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

"We see this as a powerful commitment to Afghanistan's future," she said at a news conference in the grand courtyard of Kabul's Presidential Palace. "We are not even imagining abandoning Afghanistan."

Clinton insisted that progress was coming incrementally but consistently to the war-torn nation after decades of conflict. "The security situation is more stable," she said. Afghan forces "are improving their capacity."

At the news conference, Karzai welcomed Clinton to Kabul and thanked the U.S. for its continued support.

Clinton repeated the tenets of America's "fight, talk, build" strategy for Afghanistan. The goal aims first to defeat dangerous extremists, win over Taliban militants and others willing to give up violence and help in the long reconstruction of Afghanistan ahead.

Reconciliation efforts haven't gained steam, but Clinton said she was pleased to be meeting the foreign ministers of Afghanistan and Pakistan together in Tokyo — a three-way relationship seen as key to stabilizing Afghanistan.

From Kabul, Clinton was heading later Saturday to Japan for an international conference on Afghan civilian assistance. Donors are expected to pledge around $4 billion a year in long-term civilian support.

Clinton stressed the importance of the pledges for civilian aid. Afghanistan's cash-strapped government is heavily dependent on foreign largesse, and any significant drop-off in financial assistance after 2014 could set back the country's development.

Asked about the systemic corruption that has plagued the Afghan government, Clinton said the U.S. was working hard with Afghan authorities to eliminate fraud, mismanagement abuse. She said the meeting in Tokyo would include accountability measures to ensure that money sent to Afghanistan benefits the Afghan people.

"This is an issue the government and the people of Afghanistan want action on, and we want to ensure they are successful," Clinton said.

Nations that once gave more generously to Afghanistan are now seeking guarantees that their taxpayer money will not be lost to corruption and mismanagement.

In Tokyo, representatives from some 70 countries and organizations will establish accountability guidelines to ensure that Afghanistan does more to improve governance and finance management, and to safeguard the democratic process, rule of law and human rights — especially those of women.

On the major non-NATO ally designation, Clinton said Afghanistan would have access to U.S. defense supplies and training and cooperation.

Video: U.S. troops carry out last major offensive in Afghanistan

"This is the kind of relationship that we think will be especially beneficial as we plan for the transition," she said. "It will help the Afghan military expand its capacity and have a broader relationship with the United States."

Designating Afghanistan as a major non-NATO ally was part of a Strategic Partnership Agreement signed by Presidents Obama and Karzai in Kabul at the beginning of May.

On July 4, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Ryan Crocker, and the country's foreign minister announced that the two countries had completed their internal processes to ratify the agreement, which has now gone into force.

The designation allows for streamlined defense cooperation, including expedited purchasing ability of American equipment and easier export control regulations. Afghanistan's military, which is heavily dependent on American and foreign assistance, already enjoys many of these benefits. The non-NATO ally status guarantees it will continue to do so.

The "designation provides a long-term framework for our security and defense cooperation," a State Department statement said. "It reinforces the strong bilateral defense relationship between the United States and Afghanistan by helping support aligned defense planning, procurement and training. Only a limited number of countries have this special status."

State Department sources say that this is the first time the Obama administration has bestowed that label on any country. The last one was Pakistan in 2004.

The U.S. currently plans to withdraw 88,000 troops by the end of 2014. Nearly 40,000 counterparts from other nations plan to do the same.

Clinton arrived in Afghanistan from Paris, where she attended a 100-nation conference on Syria.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
30 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
formerlyluvnut says:
Politics is soooo rediculous. What does this mean..that pakistan is our BFF???
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
realtimecoffee says:
Another victory for the military industrial complex. This makes weapons sales much easier.
reply
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
George H W Bush walks into the kitchen one morning and Barbara is cooking sausage on the stove. George opens the cupboard to get some cereal but finds none. Hey Barb, he says, where's my Lucky Charms? Barb laughs and said she swapped them for the sausage she was frying. George is shocked. You traded Charms for Sausages?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
++++"We are not even imagining abandoning Afghanistan."++++Hillary Rodham Clinton said.
============
who would dare to say otherwise?
anyway, the U.S. will never leave Afghanistan
"au revoir"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Keypinitreel1 says:
GONNA NEED THEM WHEN WE HAVE TO INVADE PAKISTAN TO KEEP NUKES OUT OF THE HANDS OF THE TALIBAN OR AQ.


This is not rocket science.
reply
Keypinitreel1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Oh yeah... they might be handy to use for an Iranian invasion too.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ThomasSense says:
With the Russians bleeding so badly there, why did President Reagan help end their stay?
Sadly, now we are bleeding there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
82ndairbornediv says:
So we add another corrupt government as an ally. It's always worked out so well in the past. The only thing we learn from history is that we NEVER LEARN FROM HISTORY.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
smittyc says:
Current U.S. administrations policies and politics has united the Taliban and the Afghanistan army against NATO. Karzai and his administration will flee Afghanistan after withdrawal of NATO troops. The real situation is we have bought the good will in Pakistan and Afghanistan of a few corrupt politicians while displacing hundreds of thousands of villagers and farmers. Our mission was Al Queda, they were defeated several years ago.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nohater says:
obama and hillary aren't keeping their eye on the ball. karzai has already stated publicly that afghanistan would side with pakistan if pakistan and the USA went to war against each other. obama and hillary's declaration only makes the USA look silly as blazes. have no faith in obama's foreign policy. he spent one billion in military missions to overthrow qaddafi at a time the USA could not afford it and while millions of USA citizens were, and are, jobless, homeless, hungry. obama then gives the palestinains 147 million when USA citizens desperately are in need of help here at home.
reply
MidWestSense replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The $147million was to stop them from going to the UN.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lucifersshadow says:
This will be a great deal . . . . Afghanistan will do as much as Pakistan has done for us!
reply
Nocults replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The Afghans are constantly stabbing us in the back, sucking up more U.S. taxpayer subsidies every year, and have no respect for international law.
Sounds like our other "ally", Israel, except the Afghans haven't murdered any U.S. sailors, YET.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
forumcomments says:
The real question is whether the aphgan military will ever be self sufficient? They have so far shown no ability to maintain security on their own. As for other NATO nations, France is leaving this year. We will have a non combat force there after 2014. Presumably our troops stationed there will rely on the aphgan military for security. Sounds like a bad situation going forward. I have never heard of this new designation major non NATO ally. What does it mean in terms of money and resources?
reply
See all 30 Comments