Iran tests missiles, renews Hormuz closure threat as EU oil embargo kicks in
Iranian Navy boats take part in maneuvers during the "Velayat-90" navy exercises in the Strait of Hormuz in southern Iran, Jan. 3, 2012, at the end day of ten-day war games. / Getty
(CBS/AP) TEHRAN, Iran - Iran's official news agency official IRNA reports that the country's powerful Revolutionary Guards unit has launched several missiles in a military exercise.
Iran holds several military maneuvers per year, but the current one coincides with the beginning of a European Union oil embargo meant to pressure the country over its nuclear program.
The Tuesday report said the missiles, including long-range ones capable of hitting U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf, successfully hit their targets.
Iran seeks "win-win" in nuke talks
Officials: Iranians sought U.S. targets in Kenya
Video: Computer virus targets Iran's nuke program
Iran has balked at the EU oil embargo since it was first approved by the 27-nation bloc in January, with Tehran threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz - a vital shipping channel through which a fifth of the world's oil supply passes - in retaliation.
Reacting at the time, Ramin Mehmanparast, a spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry, called the economic sanctions "illogical and unfair".
He said due to the world's long-term need for energy, "It is not possible to impose sanctions on Iran," which has huge resources of oil and gas.
Iranian lawmakers appeared to renew the threat of closing Hormuz off to international tanker traffic on Monday, as a member of parliament told news media a "bill has been developed as an answer to the European Union's oil sanctions".
According to the Reuters, MP Ibrahim Agha-Mohammadi told an Iranian news agency that the bill, "stresses the blocking of oil tanker traffic carrying oil to countries that have sanctioned Iran."
When Iran started making threats to close the Strait, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told CBS "Face the Nation" that Washington would simply "not tolerate" such a move by the Iranian military. (Click player at left to see interview with Panetta and General Martin Dempsey)"That's another red line for us and that we will respond to them," he added.
General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, added that while the Iranians have the capability to block the strait for a time, the U.S. would also be able to "defeat" them if it happened.
"They've invested in capabilities that could, in fact, for a period of time block the Straits of Hormuz. We've invested in capabilities to ensure that if that happens, we can defeat that," he said. "We've described that as an intolerable act. And it's not just intolerable for us, it's intolerable to the world. But we would take action and reopen the Straits."
CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer reports that any closure of the Strait - regardless of brevity, would send global oil prices soaring.
(In the video at left, Palmer discusses Iran's apparent intentions with "CBS This Morning" co-hosts Jeff Glor and Erica Hill) "There's saber-rattling on both sides," however, notes Palmer. "The U.S. has been building up its own military presence in the Persian Gulf as a deterrent to Iran, and also to Israel which has threatened to attack Iran's nuclear facilities."The danger, says Palmer, is that with the tension building and U.S. and Iranian military vessels sailing withing close range of each other, "a mistake can so rapidly escalate into open conflict."
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Boat hijack stokes tension between N. Korea, China
- Visitors evacuate after suicide at Paris' Notre Dame Cathedral
- China probes rice tainted with cancer-causing cadmium
- Egypt troops in Sinai sweep mistakenly hit funeral
- Hezbollah suffers heavy losses fighting inside Syria
- Lebanon reportedly stopping Syria refugees at border
- Russia shows accused U.S. spy heading home
- Syria activists: 31 Hezbollah fighters killed in Qusair














Then, when Israel opens its surgical strike bombing of Iran's nuclear sites, w can do a better job of backing up our ally. BTW, the war would be over by the end of the year, but still active at the election date; and who ever wants to change presidents during a war? This could change the whole dynamic of the domestic war between our two parties.
However, we are too complacent and lazy, to seriously wean ourselves off from oil dependency to fuel our cars, toys and other of our creature comforts.
Can we raise taxes on the rich to pay for their removal???????
By 1974 U.S. Intelligence believed Israel had stockpiled a small number of fission weapons,[54] and by 1979 were perhaps in a position to test a more advanced small tactical nuclear weapon or thermonuclear weapon trigger design.[55]
Remember the USS Liberty, and you think israel is our friend.
The official publication of the shipping industry, The Maritime Executive states:
"Finnish police launched a probe on a ship bound for Shanghai, China, after they discovered 69 surface-to-air Patriot missiles, explosive materials, and propelling charges illegally aboard. " Note, what had been called by some "chemicals" are now "propelling charges." What they propel, of course, are guided missiles from nuclear submarines and plutonium and uranium components into contact to initiate nuclear explosions.
How far are we willing to go to ensure the Israelis remain the only country in the Middle East with WMD's??????????????????????
Just saying????????????