AP/ May 25, 2012, 7:18 AM

IAEA: Traces of higher enrichment at Iran site

map of Iran with nuclear symbol

map of Iran with nuclear symbol / CBS/iStockphoto

(AP) VIENNA - Inspectors have found traces of uranium enriched at an Iranian site to a level that is slightly closer to the threshold needed to arm nuclear missiles, the U.N. nuclear agency said Friday.

Iran said the find was a technical glitch, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency report. The agency said it was assessing that explanation and has asked for more details, but analysts and diplomats said Iran's version sounded plausible.

The news comes a day after Iran and six world powers meeting in Baghdad found they were still far apart over how to oversee Tehran's atomic program but scheduled more talks next month as an alternative to possible military action.

Iran is under several rounds of U.N. sanctions for its failure to disclose information on its controversial nuclear program. Tehran says it is enriching uranium to provide more nuclear energy for its growing population, while the U.S. and other nations fear that Iran doing that so it can later make nuclear weapons.

Iran nuclear talks end, next round in Moscow
Iran rejects nuclear curbs proposed by U.S., other world powers
Poll: Opposition to Iran going nuclear widespread

In its report, the nuclear agency said its experts have found particles enriched up to 27 percent at the Fordo enrichment plant in central Iran.

That is still substantially below the 90-percent level needed to make the fissile core of nuclear arms. But it is above Iran's highest-known enrichment grade, which is close to 20 percent and can be turned into weapons-grade material much more quickly than the Islamic Republic's main stockpile, which can only be used for fuel at around 3.5 percent enrichment.

Calls to Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran's chief delegate to the IAEA, were rejected and the switchboard at the Iranian mission said he was not available.

Several diplomats — who demanded anonymity because their information is privileged — said the find did not necessarily mean that Iran was covertly raising its enrichment threshold toward weapons-grade level. They said the centrifuges that produce enriched uranium could have over-enriched at the start as technicians adjusted their output — an assessment shared by nonproliferation expert David Albright.

Albright, whose Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security looks for signs of proliferation, said a new configuration at Fordo means it tends to "overshoot 20 percent" at the start.

"Nonetheless, embarrassing for Iran," he wrote in an email to the AP.

The latest attempt to persuade Iran to compromise and let U.N. experts view its nuclear program ended inconclusively Thursday at a meeting in Baghdad. At the talks, six nations — the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany — failed to persuade Tehran to freeze its 20 percent enrichment. Envoys said the group will meet again next month in Moscow.

Iran went into the Baghdad talks urging the West to scale back on recently toughened sanctions, which have targeted Iran's critical oil exports and have effectively blackballed the country from international banking networks. The 27-nation European Union is set to ban all Iranian fuel imports on July 1, shutting the door on about 18 percent of Iran's market.

Iran started enriching uranium to 20 percent last year, mostly at Fordo, saying it needed the material to fuel a research reactor and for medical purposes. Still, its long-standing refusal to stop enrichment and accept reactor fuel from abroad has sparked fears it wants to expand its domestic program to be able to turn it toward making weapons.

Those concerns have increased since it started higher enrichment at Fordo, which is carved into a mountain to make it impervious to attack from Israel or the United States. Those two nations have not ruled out using force as a last option if diplomacy fails to curb the Islamic Republic's nuclear program.

Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, offered a lukewarm assessment of the latest negotiations, in light of European and American refusal to lift tough sanctions against Iran as Tehran had hoped.

"The result of the talks was that we were able to get more familiar with the views of each other," Jalili told reporters.

European diplomats focused on the positives.

"It is clear that we both want to make progress and that there is some common ground," European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who led the Baghdad talks, told reporters. "However, significant differences remain. Nonetheless, we do agree on the need for further discussion to expand that common ground."

But in Washington, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said significant differences remain between the two sides and that it's now up to Iran "to close the gaps."

"Iran now has the choice to make: Will it meet its international obligations and give the world confidence about its intentions or not?" Clinton said.

Iran already has around 700 centrifuges churning out 20-percent enriched uranium at Fordo. The diplomats said the report notes that — while Iran has set up around 350 more centrifuges since late last year at the site — these machines are not enriching.

While the reason for that could be purely technical, it could also be a signal from Tehran that it is waiting for progress in the negotiations.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
16 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
honest_pols says:
Please take the time to view and listen to the 8:58 minute Youtube Video with Scholar Bernard Lewis. Otherwise, you are limiting yourself and resigning yourself to extreme knowledge deprivation, not to mention extreme danger.

Here's the link is:

http://www.madisdead.blogspot.com
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slownewsday_5000 says:
IAEA???

Why is it that ISRAEL won't let them in?

What is Israel hiding??
reply
fedup12 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I will guess a BUNCH of warheads worth of highly enriched uranium.... Just a guess.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pickapeck13 says:
Anonymous "diplomats" (from where?) say that the IAEA found some more highly enriched uranium in Iran. The actual IAEA has no comment. What a story!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
m3houston says:
Oh look. Enrichment to a purity 7 times higher than needed for peaceful purposes. Shocking, right?

FYI folks: Enrichment from 1-20% is exponentially more difficult than 20-80%.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fedup12 says:
Here we go. The chicken littles will be wanting to spend us into oblivion to take down a bunch of backward heathens in a country smaller than Texas.

Great...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightofwrong says:
What would happen if another Chernobyl happened in Iran?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Mikey_Mo says:
Wars are criminal, except when it's in defending your home and family, and friends and your neighbors lives.
War starters going from history, looks to be mostly loosers.
If we attack first you better have some good BS to feed the world, because you already lost by starting war in the first place.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lifesablast says:
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to release new data showing that various milk and water supply samples from across the US are testing increasingly high for radioactive elements such as Iodine-131, Cesium-134, and Cesium-137, all of which are being emitted from the ongoing Fukushima Daiichia nuclear fallout
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
honest_pols says:
NAIVE DIPLOMATIC EXPECTATIONS RE IRAN'S NUCLEAR WEAPONISATION HAVE FAILED

Our responsible world leaders are charged with removing this major, major global danger without delay.

The longer we wait, the greater the toll on all of us.

We have learned by now - with great certainty - that the Apocalyptic mindset of Iran's current regime, ensures Nuclear Destruction with regard to all aspects of life, as well as those of our life-sustaining environment.

Elimination of the Iranian Nuclear Weaponisation Program and its entire Nuclear Program must be taken out by whatever means necessary, as Iran's religiously-delusional EVIL leaders' intentions are sufficiently known.
reply
xJohnPx replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Unlike the United states which seems to attack a different country every few years, Iran Has not attacked another country in over 150 years. It would seem we are More of a major global danger then Iran. Didn't we hear this same bull with regards to Iraq.
honest_pols replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
to xJohnPx

Please take the time to view and listen to the 8:58 minute Youtube Video with Scholar Bernard Lewis. Otherwise, you are limiting yourself and resigning yourself, to extreme knowledge deprivation.
http://www.madisdead.blogspot.com
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sjc_1 says:
Please, the world is not coming to an end, get a grip. It is good that we are on this issue now rather than labeling them the "axis of evil" and trying to reignite the cold war for profit.
reply
See all 16 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right