Israel: Possible Iran deal to open nuclear sites up to inspections doesn't rule out military strike

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak reviews a military honor guard during a welcoming ceremony in Athens, Greece, Jan. 10, 2012. / AFP/Getty Images
(CBS/AP) JERUSALEM - Israel's defense minister said Iran's preliminary agreement to open its nuclear facilities to U.N. inspectors doesn't rule out a possible Israeli military strike.
Ehud Barak said on Wednesday that he's skeptical about the deal, which he calls an Iranian ploy to fend off international pressure to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions.
But Barak told Army Radio that buying time is a problem for Israel.
He says that a "nuclear Iran is intolerable and no options should be taken off the table." The phrase is Israel's oblique reference to the use of force.
Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
Israel, along with the West, suspects that Iran is developing a nuclear bomb. Israel considers a nuclear-armed Iran a mortal threat, citing Iranian calls for Israel's destruction, Iran's support for Arab militant groups and Iran's development of missiles capable of striking Israel.
Iran and six world powers are to meet in Baghdad later Wednesday for another round of nuclear talks.
U.N. nuke chief touts Iran deal; Diplomats dubious
At G-8 meeting, leaders "unified" on Iran
Iran, Syria among top for G-8 and NATO
"Israel believes that a clear bar should be set for Iran that won't leave room for any window or crack for Iran to proceed toward military nuclear capability," Barak said during a discussion at the Defense Ministry, according to a statement from his office. "It's forbidden to make any concessions to Iran. World powers demands must be clear and unequivocal."
CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer reports that Western diplomats are skeptical about the deal. They feel that International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano felt a lot of pressure to reach an agreement with Iran and that he came back from Tehran with a lot less than he should have. Not reaching a binding, comprehensive deal fell short of expectations generally.
Barak held out the possibility that Iran be allowed to keep a "symbolic amount" of low-enriched uranium for medical or research purposes, but only if it is under "strict" international supervision.
Israel wants Iran to halt the enrichment of uranium a key step toward building a nuclear bomb and agree to ship most of its stockpile of enriched uranium out of the country and open its nuclear facilities to inspection.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack 74 Comments
- N. Korea sends top envoy to China as tensions mount
- Mexican volcano on verge of eruption 15 Photos
- People cling to car in "sidewalk skiing" stunt Play Video
- 12 years post-Taliban, Afghan women's rights under fire
- Costa Concordia captain ordered to stand trial
- Visitors evacuate after suicide at Paris' Notre Dame Cathedral
- Octogenarians in race to summit Mt. Everest
















"EDT You may not realize that you misunderstand the meaning of the "chosen people", probably because you learned it in English so infer an entitlement. In Hebrew, G_d expressed it as an obligation, upon Abraham and his descendents, that was not accompanied by any right or privilege. You might reconsider the reason for your indignation." by HermannSchmettlapp May 23, 2012 12:50 PM
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Sorry Hermann, Jews are not God's only chosen people. Rather the chosen regroup all the good people* in the world.
*Without taking into account a person's race, color, language, religious convictions or not, political or other conviction, national or social origin, property or origin or age or other status, sexual orientation, including physical or mental illness or invalidity.
......
and the pathetic Baptists buy in.
he is a troll.
He fraudulently and regularly misrepresents himself as multiple commenters when he is but one person.
He is not associated with the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
He's arrogant and thuggish actions represent some of the most basal hate speech the United States Constitution protects .. to a point long since past.
I believe he is either paid by an enemy of Western liberal democracies or suffering from a mental illness.
are so good at nation building we are still at work in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is not the 60's people.