AP/ May 7, 2012, 10:59 PM

"Austerity" is now a dirty word in Europe

Activists wear masks featuring German Chancellor Angela Merkel (2nd R) and incoming French President Francois Hollande (2nd L) as they perform a fake marriage in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, on May 7, 2012.

Activists wear masks featuring German Chancellor Angela Merkel (2nd R) and incoming French President Francois Hollande (2nd L) as they perform a fake marriage in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, on May 7, 2012. / GettyImages

(AP) PARIS - The day after Francois Hollande rode to power in France on a slogan of "change now," the conversation in Europe was already different Monday: Austerity had become a dirty word.

What replaces it, though, was anything but clear.

The newly powerful in France and Greece want to roll back the spending cuts and tax increases that have defined Europe's response to its 3-year-old debt crisis. But campaign rhetoric is likely to prove more extreme than any real-world reversal of the budget tightening.

World financial markets took Europe's latest round of political upheaval in stride, convulsing early and then recovering. The continent's uncertain future - including the possibility of Greece leaving the euro - was causing anxiety but not panic about the threat to the global economy.

But there is hardly unity in Europe.

Sunday night, Socialist president-elect Hollande celebrated his victory over Nicolas Sarkozy by vowing, "Austerity can no longer be inevitable!" (At left, watch CBS News correspondent Mark Phillips' report on whether Hollande can actually reverse existing austerity deals.)

On Monday, German Chancellor Angela Merkel gently pushed back.

She rejected Hollande's call to renegotiate a treaty signed last month on tougher action to control government deficits. "We in Germany, and I personally," she said, "believe the fiscal pact is not up for negotiation."

Still, she stressed the importance of French-German cooperation - and her willingness to meet soon with Hollande.

The EU leaders booted by the financial crisis
Just who is Francois Hollande?
IMF chief warns against steep budget cuts

Economists said that while the anti-austerity winds are bound to stir up short-term political instability, especially in Greece, they could eventually bring some financial calm.

"This is going to force some rethinking" all across Europe about how to manage the debt crisis, said Laura Gonzalez, a finance professor at Fordham University in New York. "That is good for everybody."

Greece remains the focus of Europe's financial and political unease. Political parties that made gains by rejecting belt-tightening still have to assemble a majority coalition in Parliament before they can begin governing. The conservatives got the first try Monday but failed - leaving a new left-wing, party to take its turn. If no party can assemble a coalition, the country will need to hold new elections, probably in June.

The main stock index in Greece plunged almost 7 percent. France's CAC-40 ended 1.7 percent higher.

The Dow Jones industrial average in the United States fell as much as 68 points early Monday but recouped its losses and ended the day down 30 at 13,008.

The biggest fear was that Greece's new leadership would renege on commitments made to secure the country's massive rescue loans - or even leave the euro. Merkel pressed Greek leaders on Monday to stay the course. "Of course, the most important thing is that the programs we agreed with Greece are continued," she said.

Greece wasn't the only problem. The 17 countries that use the euro - and nine other European countries - agreed in March to the fiscal compact that seeks to make countries balance their budgets. But bailout fears have intensified in recent months as Spain, Italy and other governments face rising borrowing costs on bond markets, a sign that investors are nervous about the size of their debts relative to their economic output. Austerity was intended to address these jitters by reducing their government's borrowing needs, but there has been a negative side effect: As economic output shrinks, the debt burden actually looks worse.

As Europe's economy got weaker, the public and politicians grew weary of the budget-cutting required to make the fiscal compact work. Across Europe, austerity meant layoffs and pay cuts for state workers, scaled-back expenditures on welfare and social programs, and higher taxes and fees to boost government revenue.

Hollande says he intends to renegotiate the fiscal treaty so that it places an emphasis on growth and not just deficit reduction. He says governments should actually increase spending now, while economies are so weak.

Merkel and the European Central Bank have instead stressed deeper, long term fixes such as reducing red tape for small businesses, making it easier for workers to find jobs across the eurozone and breaking down barriers that countries have created to protect their own industries. Those changes involve challenging unions and other powerful constituencies - and they can take years to have an effect.

The anti-austerity sentiment appears to be picking up strength.

In Italy on Monday, several candidates in local elections who oppose the deficit-cutting promoted by Premier Mario Monti had a strong showing. And the head of the International Monetary Fund - one of the institutions that designed the Greek bailout and the austerity measures that go with it - warned that Europe has to be careful about pushing austerity too far. Christine Lagarde said European countries should reduce their budget deficits gradually to avoid further damage to their economies.


1/2

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
38 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Zann-Zel says:
American Corporations have racked up $825 BILLION dollars in RECORD profits!
And how did they do it? By pretending they were in crisis and laying off workers, cutting wages, cutting benefits AND pocketing the savings!
WHY?
Because they must punish "the masses" for DARING to elect a black man that would stand up to them! How dare he!!!

WELL punish away "Corporations Now Known as People" - We WILL elect him AGAIN!

OBAMA 2012
reply
Zann-Zel replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And you think Romney who considers corporations to be people is going to do anything?????

Republicans work FOR corporations and if we expect this country to be run by the people, for the people - we've GOT to get as many republicans as possible OUT of Washington!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
If you work for a living you would have to be nuts to vote for a republican. Their ideology feeds on fear and desperation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
Austerity only aids the wealthy to keep their buying power and influence intact. It has been proven to fail in every country it was tried in. The people figured out they couldn't pay their national debts with the never ending you need to be more globally competitive pay cuts.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
credibility2 says:
The gluttons of mindless rabid spending are so addicted to their squandering, they're incapable of reigning it in and being fiscally responsible or accountable. No country has ever been able to tax themselves out of their economic problems without severe cuts in spending and pandering to the socialist extreme left mentality.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mikeydjd83 says:
Authority ignores democracy's primary purpose by suspending the counting of presidential election ballots and appointing its preferred conservative candidate. The surprise to some is not its relation to Greek or French current affairs but rather the US election of 2000.

Others wonder whether the US Supreme Court will continue its present course in judicially active big government.

What does the ordinary citizen need to know about Obamacare and Supreme Court Review? Experience Life among the Ordinary and read the second segment in a three part series at

http://lifeamongtheordinary.blogspot.com/2012/05/obamacare-and-supreme-court-review-part.html
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nfission says:
Perhaps this is a learning lesson for the Republicans...... or not.
reply
vsmit replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Perhaps a learning lesson for the Democrats, spend more than you make (by huge amounts) and you create social unrest when the debt can no longer be sustained.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stormerF69 says:
Yea,Austerity a bad word till the money runs out and there is no more.What a bunch of fools.
reply
KnowerseekerReturns replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"Austerity" is a bad word because it means austerity for the middle class and poor only. Include the rich/wealthy in that, and people will accept "austerity".
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dreadnut says:
No more austerity. Well, I guess it's time for Europeans to turn up the "everything is free" spigot full blast. That will really get them out of this mess.

LOL ! ! !
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
marychgo says:
For those (here and in Europe) for whom "the free market" is a religion, "austerity" is a sacrament. Oddly, however, "austerity" always seems to mean that the poor and the middle class lose out, while the folks who caused the problems do just fine.

Example: A local Caterpillar strike. Caterpillar is a hugely successful, highly profitable company headquartered in Peoria; it's busily selling its equipment to builders in China, Latin America, Israel (in the US, not so much...). Caterpillar's "last, best, and final offer" to the union that represents its workers called for a six-year (six-year!) wage freeze plus higher employee contributions for benefits; aka lower net take-home pay from now through 2018. Meanwhile, Caterpillar's Chairman, CEO, COO, CFO, and other top execs earn annual compensation in the six- and seven-figure range, and are NOT facing a wage freeze for one or two or six years....

There's a REASON why "austerity" is a dirty word...on BOTH sides of the Atlantic Ocean!
reply
marychgo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Henry Ford (hardly a raving Socialist!) understood that the best way to broaden his market, grow his business, and improve his profits was to pay his workers enough that they could aspire to own a Model T (or was it A?). Why is it too much to expect that you (or Caterpillar) would understand that basic economic principle?
KnowerseekerReturns replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
schweik223, the *principle* of a thing tends to be more important to the human psyche than the practicality of it. (If humans were robots, then that would not be the case.) I'm sure that someone could come up with arguments based upon practicality alone for why we should let all our criminals go from our prisons -- in fact, early release is based on just that. Don't be shameful. Really.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
skeezix06 says:
Austerity is a failure.
reply
karek40 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The government *** will run dry, the Euro will fail, it is just a matter of time then there will be real austerity. Nothing for anyone.
stormerF69 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Failure only in the eyes of those who want something for nothing.
See all 38 Comments