AP/ May 1, 2012, 8:18 AM

Israeli defense minister talks tough on Iran

Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak delivers a speech to the Foreign Press Association members in Jerusalem, April 30, 2012.

Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak delivers a speech to the Foreign Press Association members in Jerusalem, April 30, 2012. / AP

(AP) JERUSALEM - Israel's defense minister warned Monday that as long as Iran poses a threat to Israel with its nuclear program, all options are on the table, a reference to a possible Israeli attack.

Ehud Barak was speaking before The Foreign Press Association, which represents journalists covering Israel and the Palestinian territories.

Israel and the West suspect Iran is trying obtain nuclear weapons. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful.

Barak said, "I believe it is well understood in Washington, D.C., as well as in Jerusalem that as long as there is an existential threat to our people, all options to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons should remain on the table."

Israel army chief: Iran won't build nuke
Iran: Oil industry safe after hack attack
U.S. disputes Iran's claim about crashed drone

Israel considers Iran a threat to its existence because of its nuclear and missile development programs, frequent reference to Israel's destruction by Iranian leaders and Iran's support of violent anti-Israeli groups in Lebanon and Gaza.

Barak and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have frequently hinted at the possibility of an Israeli military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities but have not made an open threat.

"I have enough experience to know that a military option is not a simple one," Barak said of a potential strike. "It would be complicated with certain associated risks. But a radical Islamic Republic of Iran with nuclear weapons would be far more dangerous both for the region and, indeed, the world."

His remarks come as a steadily growing chorus of Israeli ex-security officials speak out against an Israeli strike on Iran. Former internal security chief Yuval Diskin recently caused an uproar when he said the government is misleading the public on the level of effectiveness of a military strike.

Other critics have warned that Israel could do no more than delay Iran's nuclear development for a few years at best, and an Israeli attack could trigger punishing retaliation from Iran and its proxies — Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza — and possibly set off a regionwide war, dragging the U.S. in.

Barak concentrated on the perceived threat to Israel, dismissing the case of the critics.

"Parts of the world, including some politically motivated Israeli figures, prefer to bury their heads in the sand," Barak said Monday.

Barak said that time is running out for a strike, as "Iran's military nuclear program will be sufficiently developed and suitably concealed, rendering the facilities immune to surgical attacks."

Iran is believed to have multiple underground nuclear sites.

Barak also addressed a year of upheavals in the Middle East that have overthrown several leaders, and Islamist political parties have gained prominence.

"Israel has found itself sitting as an island of stability in a stormy sea, a sea in which the waves of radicalism are growing in strength," Barak said.

Egypt and Israel signed a peace treaty in 1979, but relations have been cool. Some Israelis warn that the rise of Islamists to power in Egypt could endanger the treaty, but the dominant Muslim Brotherhood has said the pact will be preserved.

At the same time, many Egyptians want changes in its conditions, particularly the limits on Egyptian forces in the Sinai desert, near Israel's borders.

Sinai has become increasingly lawless over the past year. A gas pipeline between Egypt and Israel has been bombed repeatedly, Palestinian militants used Sinai to infiltrate into Israel and killed eight people and smugglers use the desert to smuggle migrants and drugs into Israel.

"We urge Egypt to contain lawlessness in the Sinai Peninsula," Barak said. "This is imperative in order to keep our two nations firmly on the path of peace, a peace that has contributed so much to so many for so long now."

Barak also addressed Syria, where a bloody 14-month uprising against President Bashar Assad is in progress. Israel and Syria are bitter enemies.

"Whatever follows Assad's bloodstained regime will be greeted with Israel's extended hand of peace," Barak said.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
9 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Logical123 says:
I am getting sick and tired of all this noise from Israel. As Ali Larijani, the speaker of the Iranian parliament, has said, Israel is like a dog that barks a lot but won't bite. Netanyahu and Barak are just full of hot air. No one should pay any attention to what they say. the media should simply ignore them.

Israel only attacks people like those in Gaza who cannot defend themselves. It doesn't have the capability or guts to attack Iran. If it makes any aggressive move against Iran, Israel will cease to exist.

As Yuval Diskin, the former head of Shin Beth has said, Bibi and Barak lie about Iran. He also said that they make decisions based on "messianic" feelings. Thus, ignoring these two madmen is the best policy at this time.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
audemus says:
To a large extent, Israel reminds me of the little brother who is very brave, even threatening to his perceived enemies, so long as he knows big brother has his back.....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
John_Merritt says:
The one pressing question and dilemma any leader needs to ask when the question of war rises is: "If we have to fight with no allies or reserves can we win against our opponent?" In other words it is much easier to raise the specter of 'what ifs' when you know a super power is in your corner. But the true test and strength of a nation is the ability of going it alone if needed.

I love Israel and everything it stands for however in this case 'is it easier to make friends of your enemies than it is turning your friends into enemies?' In this case the world wants and perhaps demands peace however war should always be the last resort in a civilized community. The days of barbaric behavior ended very long time ago, however it appears at times man wants to return to the days of neanderthal, especially when the mention of nuclear combat takes center stage.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jesus_to_ground_control says:
Is everything on the table Ehud? Even your nuclear weapons?
reply
assyrian100 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
good question
assyrian100 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
good question
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OnTheRoad01 says:
This man is really George Bush still looking for the WMD, and starting wars!!!
reply
assyrian100 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
good one
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bulldozer-Shaz says:
Can someone shut this despicable repulsive looking midget...
reply