CBS/AP/ April 6, 2012, 8:39 PM

Coast Guard cannon fire sinks Japanese ghost ship

Updated 10:59 PM ET

(AP) OVER THE GULF OF ALASKA - The long, lonely voyage of the Japanese ghost ship is over.

A U.S. Coast Guard cutter unleashed cannon fire on the abandoned 164-foot Ryou-Un Maru on Thursday, ending a journey that began when last year's tsunami dislodged it and set it adrift across the Pacific Ocean.

It sank into waters more than 1,000 feet deep in the Gulf of Alaska, more than 150 miles from land.

The crew pummeled the ghost ship with high explosive ammunition and, soon after, the Ryou-Un Maru burst into flames, began to take on water and list, officials said.

A huge column of smoke could be seen over the gulf.

The Coast Guard warned mariners to stay away, and aviation authorities did the same for pilots. A Coast Guard C-130 plane crew monitored the operation.

Boast swept away by tsunami sighted off Canada
Complete coverage: Japan tsunami disaster

In about four hours, the ship vanished into the water, said Chief Petty Officer Kip Wadlow in Juneau.

Officials decided to sink the ship, rather than risk the chance of it running aground or endangering other vessels in the busy shipping lanes between North America and Asia.

The ship had no lights or communications system and its tank was able to carry more than 2,000 gallons of diesel fuel. Officials, however, didn't know how much fuel, if any, was aboard.

"It's less risky than it would be running into shore or running into (maritime) traffic," Webb said.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency studied the problem and decided it is safer to sink the ship and let the fuel evaporate in the open water.

The ship was at Hokkaido, Japan, and destined for scrapping when a magnitude-9.0 earthquake that struck the country in March 2011 triggered a tsunami.

The waves dislodged the vessel and set it adrift. In total, about 5 million tons of debris were swept out to sea.

The boat did not have any cargo aboard, Webb said. He said he didn't know who owned the Ryou-Un Maru, which had been traveling about 1 mph in recent days.

As the Coast Guard was readying to fire on the vessel, a Canadian fishing vessel, the 62-foot Bernice C, claimed salvage rights over the ghost ship.

Plans to sink it were halted so the Canadian crew could have a chance to take the stricken ship. A Canadian official with knowledge of the situation told The Associated Press that the Bernice C was unable to tow it.

When the boat left the area, the Coast Guard began to fire, first with 25 mm shells, then a few hours later with ammunition twice that size.

In the year since the tsunami, the debris from Japan has washed up on shores across the Pacific.

In January, a half dozen large buoys suspected to be from Japanese oyster farms appeared at the top of Alaska's panhandle and may be among the first debris from the tsunami.

State health and environmental officials have said there's little need to be worried that debris landing on Alaska shores will be contaminated by radiation.

The earthquake triggered the world's worst nuclear crisis since the Chernobyl accident in 1986.

State officials have been working with federal counterparts to gauge the danger of debris including material affected by a damaged nuclear power plant, to see if Alaska residents, seafood or wild game could be affected.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
69 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
electronbrainjames says:
They are hiding the truth.

The ship probably has massive radiation and they didn't want to alarm people, because people would be freaked out that that same radiation is coming to the West Cost.
reply
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Don't worry Silly, all that radiation will be coming for you bit by bit in your Cup-a-Soup.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
superdynamite says:
Great! More oil, gas and garbage dumped into the ocean. They couldn't tow it to shore and scrap the metal for recycle??? Looks like 4 or 500K in metal.

Smart!
Go USA!!!
reply
realtimecoffee replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
'5 million tons of debris were swept out to sea.' and this keeps you up nights? Do you compost your own waste?
lillyhorton replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I do. This isn't a little thing. Someone should be fined.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nomealaska says:
This article is wrong. It is likely that the US Navy sank the vessel, since they own the big guns on the USCG cutters, and they have a US Navy officer onboard specifically to operate those guns for the USCG. This is according to the Coasties that gave me a tour aboard a cutter.
reply
nomealaska replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well, it could have been the USCG, since it appears that they only used their small arms on the ghosts.
nomealaska replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No, I will stick with my original assessment. Go Navy!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jhihmoac says:
"No ghosts were harmed in the sinking of this vessel..."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lillyhorton says:
No government shouldn't lecture the population on pollution. They only gave two choices of disposal. One was to let the vessel drift and the other was to sink it. Why didn't they bring it to shore, empty out the fuel then melt it down for recycle? Instead it lays at the bottom releasing oil and gas into the water along with all the barrels of nerve gas the US dumped and varrious other chemicals countries dump. Don't blame the populas for the mass destruction of sea life.
reply
Lindag10 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Did you READ the article? Someone DID try to salvage the ship and were unable to tow it anywhere. It also was more of a navagiation hazard while drifting who knows where.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lifesablast says:
Screw the USCG. I tried to join the USCG in 1967..They told me I had to be black, hispanic or female.....No white boys allowed.
reply
PatDaddy67 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Idiot!
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BS.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dgunner says:
BBC news said the owner was located and stated he did not want the ship back. Yahoo can stream evrything they want but the truth . Bad as fox news and worse than abc news.The US should bill the japanese govt. for the cost of this operation . They won't because the communist SOBS will deny who owns the ship. If the ship was full of immigrants that died from starvation the owner would be found in two days .Things like this will be a factor in Obam losing the election . Along with not lifting federal taxes on a gallon of gas to give the citizens of the US a break on gas prices.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rottenideas says:
This is a great training exercise for the Coast Guard. This "Plumb" comes floating toward Alaska. You have a bunch of Sailors on an armed-to-the -teeth American vessel. It was a great opportunity to fill it full of holes.Still waiting for the Video.?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Weazerdogg says:
4 hours! It took them 4 hours to sink a derelict fishing boat??!!?? Thats pathetic, what kind of military are we paying for, it took them 10 years to find Bin Laden, the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have been a total waste of time, life, and money and it took 4 freakin' hours to sink a derelict fishing boat! Guess what, ya'll, we taxpayers are being seriously screwed!!!!
reply
signseeker1717 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It's not the military's capability that should be questioned; it's how that capability is USED. And it's a matter of priorities; Bush didn't consider Bin Laden a priority - President Obama DID.

If sinking a derelict fishing vessel had been some sort of war-time priority, it would have been blown to smithereens in one shot by a military vessel with much stronger firepower. But it wasn't.

And if the US had sent, say, an aircraft carrier to do the job, it would have been much more expensive, considered overkill, and people would've been screaming about the cost of THAT.

There's no pleasing some people.
enlightenu replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Look, they put some holes in it and then waited for it to fill with water. They did it the cheapest way possible using tiny 25mm and 50 mm shells. You would have preferred if they used a $500k missile to blow it to pieces in an instant?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
9091092255 says:
Hey, free Americian people, help Russians to break free from the dictator Putin- vote against him, please! - http://ti.me/ymKTag
reply
PatDaddy67 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
How exactly am I to vote against Putin?
See all 69 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right