AP/ April 3, 2012, 3:11 AM

U.S. offers $10M bounty for Pakistani militant

In this April 11, 2011 file photo, Lashkar-e-Taiba founder Hafiz Saeed attends a ceremony in Islamabad, Pakistan.

In this April 11, 2011 file photo, Lashkar-e-Taiba founder Hafiz Saeed attends a ceremony in Islamabad, Pakistan. / AP

(AP) ISLAMABAD - The United States has offered a $10 million bounty for the founder of the Pakistani militant group blamed for the 2008 attacks in the Indian city of Mumbai that killed 166 people, a move that could complicate U.S.-Pakistan relations at a tense time.

Hafiz Saeed founded Lashkar-e-Taiba in the 1980s, allegedly with Pakistani support to pressure archenemy India over the disputed territory of Kashmir. Pakistan banned the group in 2002 under pressure from the U.S. but has done little to crack down on its activities.

Saeed operates openly in the country, giving public speeches and appearing on TV talk shows. The U.S. also offered up to $2 million for Lashkar-e-Taiba's deputy leader, Hafiz Abdul Rahman Makki.

U.S. enemies in Pakistan getting organized
Pakistan: Not evidence to hold Mumbai plotter
Pakistan sentences bin Laden kin to 45 days

The bounties were posted on the U.S. State Department Rewards for Justice website late Monday, the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad said Tuesday.

The reward for Saeed is one of the highest offered by the program and is equal to the amount for Taliban chief Mullah Omar. Only Ayman al-Zawahri, who succeeded Osama bin Laden as al Qaeda chief, fetches a higher, $25 million bounty.

U.S. Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman announced the bounty for Lashkar-e-Taiba's leader and deputy on Monday during a visit to India, according to The Times of India newspaper.

The move comes at a particularly tense time in the troubled relationship with the U.S. and Pakistan. Pakistan's parliament is currently debating a revised framework for relations with the U.S. in the wake of American air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in November at two posts along the Afghan border.

Pakistan retaliated by kicking the U.S. out of a base used by American drones and closing its border crossings to supplies meant for NATO troops in Afghanistan.

The U.S. hopes the parliamentary debate will result in Pakistan reopening the supply lines. The closure has been a headache for the U.S. because it has had to spend more money sending supplies through an alternate route that runs through Central Asia. It also needs the route to withdraw equipment as it seeks to pull most of its combat forces out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014.

But it's unclear whether the U.S. will be willing to meet Pakistan's demands, which include higher transit fees for the supplies and an unconditional apology for the air strikes, which the U.S. has said were an accident. Pakistan has also demanded an end to American drone strikes in Pakistan, but it's unclear if that will be tied to the reopening of the supply line.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
8 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ssporleder says:
Send in mercinaries and use the $10 Million dollars here in AMERICA!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jesus_to_ground_control says:
Dirty Money!

When a country like the U.S. has to go hunt for a criminal in a foreign country (in which it is not at war) it stinks high hell. There is no excuse for not using Pakistan's to arrest Saeed and then try him in the International court of Justice.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cbs_bull says:
Another good move by this administration. We should try to kill Pakistani terrorists by ourselves instead of to trust the game-playing Pakistan.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
endpcnow says:
I wouldn't ASK for Pakistan's permission about anything. If I were President, they would do it, or suffer the consequences. Sick of these fourth rate cesspool countries endangering our soldiers and making the US look like a bunch of weak ****. Puck Fackistan.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rodeo_Joe says:
Instant Karma is gonna get you.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
xJohnPx says:
Why isn't India paying the reward for a terrorist attack in India. Those politicians sure are generous with US taxpayer money. I guess they want the United States to become a target of this group as well.
reply
notparicular replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Because Indian politicians are gutless.
Lerianis4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Who says that they aren't offering a comparable reward? The fact is that the United States has more money than India to spend on things like this and catching terrorists helps us as well.