Sgt. Bales' lawyer: U.S. "hiding evidence"

Defense attorney John Henry Browne talks to reporters in Seattle March 15, 2012, about his client, Robert Bales, the U.S. soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians. / AP Photo

Updated at 1:42 p.m. ET

(AP) SEATTLE - The attorney for the U.S. soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians said Friday that the U.S. government is "hiding evidence" from the defense team.

John Henry Browne told The Associated Press that members of the defense team in Afghanistan were told they would have access to witnesses at a hospital, but later discovered the people had been released.

He also said the U.S. government has not turned over files to the lawyers defending Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales.

Special Section: Afghanistan, Ten Years Later
Lawyer: Sgt. Bales' tours left major depression
Poll: Support for Afghan war hits all-time low

The defense team said in a statement the prosecution is withholding information "while potential witnesses scatter."

"It's outrageous," Browne said. "What they are basically doing is hiding evidence. The only reason to hide evidence is if you don't have evidence."

An Army spokesman did not immediately return a call seeking comment on Browne's allegations.

Bales has been charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder. He remained held at a U.S. military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.

The defense statement said the team in Afghanistan attempted to interview injured civilians being treated at a hospital in Kandahar, but were denied access and told to coordinate with prosecutors.

The prosecution team interviewed the civilians, but the defense team said they were unable to after the people were released and no contact information was provided for them.

Browne's team also said they have been denied access to the civilians' medical records, as well as video allegedly taken from a surveillance blimp showing Bales on the night of the killings.

Dan Conway, a military attorney who represented one of four Lewis-McChord soldiers convicted in the deliberate killings of three Afghan civilians in 2010, said the government doesn't appear to be doing anything wrong at this point in the Bales case. He said prosecutors have little obligation to turn over evidence right now and doesn't need to help coordinate interviews this early in the process.

"This is just going to be an uphill battle," Conway said.

The defense will have a right to interview witnesses that could be called at trial, so the Army could then take the defense team into the villages with security or coordinate to have them come onto the military base. But Conway said the challenges of interviewing witnesses now means the defense team may not be able to track down people to bolster their case — such as witnesses unable to identify Bales or those who believe there were two shooters.

"If they want to talk to those witnesses, they're going to have to get an investigator and probably go to the village and talk to civilians themselves," Conway said.

U.S. military officials have said Bales was drinking on a southern Afghanistan base on March 11 before creeping away to two villages at night, shooting his victims and setting many of them on fire. Nine were children.

Bales has had incidents involving alcohol and violence in the past. In 2002, He was arrested for a drunken assault of a security guard at a Tacoma casino. That charge was dismissed after Bales completed 20 hours of anger management training.

In 2008, a couple accused an intoxicated Bales of grabbing a woman's hand and thrusting it toward his crotch before kicking and punching the woman's boyfriend, according to a police report. Prosecutors declined to pursue that case.

[nancy_naive]

There are THREE ways Sgt. Bales could receive a more just trial than with the CYA US Military Justice System; 1) in an Afghani Court, 2) in a Taliban Court, 3) in a hoodie in Sanford Fla.

[Rodeo_Joe]

Sgt. Bales already confessed to the killings. Proceed with haste.

No Justice - No Peace.

[slatep]

TO: the chooch1

Sure, give the military all the time it needs to "lose" witnesses, statements and anything else they don't want the defense to know.

You and DocD-2008 should get together sometime.

[samXXkiley]

coucou,
John Henry Browne, you believe that a person whoever it is, has the right to kill 17 people defenseless? no evidence can justify this heinous act,
"au revoir"

[thechooch1]

So the people that are in the hospital should be required to stay in the hospital until the defense team gets around to interviewing them? How much "later" is later? This trial will happen in due course, no reason for the defense to get upset at this stage.